User talk:DeltaSnowQueen/Archive 1

Your thread has been archived

Hi DeltaSnowQueen! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hello. Part two., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi DeltaSnowQueen! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Uploading a photo & copyright, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... understanding how to deal with using the same source multiple times within the same article, without clogging up the reference section with duplicates. For example, I'm trying to expand Michael J. Todd and so far the BBC Profile article is separately listed 3 times - how do I condense that? Thank you. DSQ (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DeltaSnowQueen! This section explains how to name a reference so that it can be used repeatedly in the article without creating a new reference number. If let me know which article you're working on I can show you how it works.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crikey that was quick! I'm working on Michael J. Todd and I keep referring to the same article. Repeatedly.

I've tried to find some guidance myself, but I just don't get it. I've already broken my archive today so I figured I'd best ask before breaking anything else. Thank you! --DSQ (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it's the BBC profile and the Independent article you want to reuse? If so, you just need to give the reference a name the first time you use it, then include the reference name tag for each use after that. (Clear as mud?) I'll do the BBC and Independent ones so you can see how it's done.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All done!-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're a star! I'm just looking at what you did right now. That's way easier for me to follow for future reference. Thank you so much for your help. I appreciate it! DSQ (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Grimes

Hi, I wanted to explain the modifications I made to your edit to Darren Grimes. I removed the sentence He had, however, already declared that the interview was "bloody good", clarified that he'd reviewed it before it was published and only distanced himself from Starkey's comments following the media storm. because his tweets that you cited didn't actually say those things. In this tweet, he said that meeting one of his heroes was "bloody fantastic", which is not the same as saying that it was a good interview; "watching this interview back" isn't specifically claiming that he "reviewed" which implies a level of editorial analysis that "watching" doesn't convey; and making the point that "only distanced himself...media storm" is observation on your part. If an independent source reported on his tweets in that way, it could be added with attribution, but interpreting the tweets and their timing yourself makes it original research and synthesis. I'm not disagreeing with your interpretation, we just can't add our own interpretations in a WP:BLP article.

If that doesn't make sense or if you disagree with me, I'm happy to discuss it further. Schazjmd (talk) 13:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Schazjmd. Thank you for your note and for explaining where I went wrong with that edit. It does make sense and I agree 100%. In fact, I've got no idea what I was thining now I come to look back on it! I wasn't even too sure I could cite the tweets at all and I should've gone to the talk page instead of editing it myself. Lesson leanrt and I'll be more careful in future. --DSQ (talk) 20:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding! I did leave the initial tweet (his response to the criticism). Citing a tweet can be a gray area (see WP:ABOUTSELF for the guidelines), but I agreed with you that it made sense to include in this instance. Schazjmd (talk) 21:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
11,956	Keir Starmer (talk)	Add sources
60	Labour Friends of Palestine & the Middle East (talk)	Add sources
12,254	Boris Johnson (talk)	Add sources
1,503	Blackadder (talk)	Add sources
1,505	JPEG (talk)	Add sources
2,087	Dominic Raab (talk)	Add sources
97	Premiership of Theresa May (talk)	Cleanup
5	Embassy of the United States, Luxembourg (talk)	Cleanup
432	Chicago Sun-Times (talk)	Cleanup
61	Horus Heresy (fictional event) (talk)	Expand
4	Embassy of Angola, London (talk)	Expand
15	Embassy of France, London (talk)	Expand
679	Likud (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
76	Politico-media complex (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
98	Shifta War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
28	Clannism (talk)	Merge
420	Now TV (Sky) (talk)	Merge
21	Undercover Mosque (talk)	Merge
62	Embassy of the United States, Berlin (talk)	Wikify
15	Leader of the Labour Party in the House of Lords (talk)	Wikify
20	Media Standards Trust (talk)	Wikify
3	John Deane Potter (talk)	Orphan
11	Richard Latendresse (talk)	Orphan
13	Bader bin Saud bin Mohammed Al Saud (talk)	Orphan
7	Alf Lomas (talk)	Stub
4	David Whatton (talk)	Stub
22	Hive tool (talk)	Stub
8	Barry Seal (politician) (talk)	Stub
10	Gladstone–MacDonald pact (talk)	Stub
4	Jefferson House, Colombo (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
11,956	Keir Starmer (talk)	Add sources
60	Labour Friends of Palestine & the Middle East (talk)	Add sources
12,254	Boris Johnson (talk)	Add sources
1,503	Blackadder (talk)	Add sources
1,505	JPEG (talk)	Add sources
2,087	Dominic Raab (talk)	Add sources
97	Premiership of Theresa May (talk)	Cleanup
5	Embassy of the United States, Luxembourg (talk)	Cleanup
432	Chicago Sun-Times (talk)	Cleanup
61	Horus Heresy (fictional event) (talk)	Expand
4	Embassy of Angola, London (talk)	Expand
15	Embassy of France, London (talk)	Expand
679	Likud (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
76	Politico-media complex (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
98	Shifta War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
28	Clannism (talk)	Merge
420	Now TV (Sky) (talk)	Merge
21	Undercover Mosque (talk)	Merge
62	Embassy of the United States, Berlin (talk)	Wikify
15	Leader of the Labour Party in the House of Lords (talk)	Wikify
20	Media Standards Trust (talk)	Wikify
3	John Deane Potter (talk)	Orphan
11	Richard Latendresse (talk)	Orphan
13	Bader bin Saud bin Mohammed Al Saud (talk)	Orphan
7	Alf Lomas (talk)	Stub
4	David Whatton (talk)	Stub
22	Hive tool (talk)	Stub
8	Barry Seal (politician) (talk)	Stub
10	Gladstone–MacDonald pact (talk)	Stub
4	Jefferson House, Colombo (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some help

Hi,

Recently initiated a new Draft:Sexual politics and looking for proactive help in updating and expanding the article. Please do see if contributing to Draft:Sexual politics would interest you.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bookku. Thank for you for your message. I'd love to be able to help you but, to be frank, I'm still a bit of a novice and might be more of a hindrance than a help. :) I don't have as much time as I would like either. I could possibly contribute something on Honor killing if that fits in to your article? I've watchlisted your draft anyway and I'll get back to you when I've completed the 2 articles I'm working on currently. Kind regards --DSQ (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello once again and greetings, On an average I send request messages after bit of analyzing contributions so usually I am confident enough it would not turn out to be hindrance, and I request enough no of people so it balances out. It's my way of politic! :)

All gender relation topics including that of honor killing do touch corner stone of Draft:Sexual politics some where. Following Bengal related article will help you connect dots and understand relation of honor, sexual politics and honor killing. (That may help you co-relate kind of social narrative and social politics might be at play behind scene in family and society of Banaz Mahmod)

I covered Bengal reference in Draft:Sexual politics in south Asia but I have written it too poorly and myself feeling I have not given a proper justice. So if topic interests you then you can help me out at Draft:Sexual politics in south Asia in better paraphrasing about honor killing. Of course Draft:Sexual politics would remain to be main article.

Art and drama on a 19th-century Bengal scandal reveal the gender and sexual politics of the time

You can take your time, absolutely no hurry, Wikipedia is improving on women biographies is good, but needs bit more attending of theoretical sides too and even a little support will be value wise big. Looking forward to your continued support. Thanks and warm regards.

Bookku (talk) 02:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning Bookku. I figured it might be my edits to Banaz' article that brought you here! I've nearly finished doing what I want to do to that article, then I must finish the one I have sat in my sandbox :p - that seems to be taking me forever. In the meantime I've watchlisted your other drat article too and I'll pop up on your talk page when I've got some more time. Interesting article in your link by the way. Take care and kind regards. --DSQ (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi DeltaSnowQueen! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Blunt opinion required........., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pottery Cottage murders has been accepted

The Pottery Cottage murders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this contribution. The newspaper articles from the British Newspaper Archive are mostly missing titles (I could get three for free, but that's all...). Could you fill them in? Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reviewing that for me Calliopejen1! So quick! I'll fix those titles now and thank you for tidying up the general mess I made in the references too. Kind Regards --DSQ (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Great work on your first article Pottery Cottage murders

Theroadislong (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Theroadislong! I came so close to abandoning it, I'm glad I didn't now. I was coming to drop you a line, I was just fixing those missing titles first, and you beat me to it. Thanks again. --DSQ (talk) 07:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tulay Goren has been accepted

Tulay Goren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi DeltaSnowQueen! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing the name of a submitted draft article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
42	Women in Bulgaria (talk)	Add sources
23	Kurds in Sweden (talk)	Add sources
113	Women's boxing (talk)	Add sources
82	Peel Regional Police (talk)	Add sources
36	National Domestic Violence Hotline (talk)	Add sources
194	Sororicide (talk)	Add sources
411	Rape in Pakistan (talk)	Cleanup
57	Namus (talk)	Cleanup
265	Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom (talk)	Cleanup
47	Human rights in post-invasion Iraq (talk)	Expand
164	Love marriage (talk)	Expand
101	Women's mixed martial arts (talk)	Expand
366	Uxoricide (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
39	Western Iran clashes (2016–present) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,023	Femicide (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
664	Maternal death (talk)	Merge
76	Eco-anxiety (talk)	Merge
2,525	Doxing (talk)	Merge
82	Assyrians in Iraq (talk)	Wikify
75	Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (talk)	Wikify
177	Guilt-shame-fear spectrum of cultures (talk)	Wikify
92	Murder of Claire Tiltman (talk)	Orphan
5	Rajvinder Kaur Gill (talk)	Orphan
94	Licypriya Kangujam (talk)	Orphan
110	Baba Sy (talk)	Stub
66	Surjit Athwal (talk)	Stub
16	Women in Andorra (talk)	Stub
8	Burrageara (talk)	Stub
18	Daocheng County (talk)	Stub
45	Rania Alayed (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... figuring out what I've done wrong when moving my article to mainspace, because I have no idea!

Murder of Heshu Yones

I can see it doesn't have a Wikidata item ID, but I don't know if that's relevant or even what it is. Nothing else obvious stands out to me, so can you please show me what I've done wrong and how to correct it? Thank you. DSQ (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It just means that the data hasn't migrated to WD yet, that's all. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
93	Kurdish women (talk)	Add sources
243	Shafia family murders (talk)	Add sources
6	Syed Hammad Raza (talk)	Add sources
43	Margaret Oliver (talk)	Add sources
9	Domestic violence in Uganda (talk)	Add sources
237	Anfal genocide (talk)	Add sources
185	Honor killing in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
2,124	Murder (talk)	Cleanup
209	Dowry death (talk)	Cleanup
44	Honour killing of Sadia Sheikh (talk)	Expand
22	Sexual violence by intimate partners (talk)	Expand
74	Toulouse and Montauban shootings (talk)	Expand
36	Kurds in the United Kingdom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16	Domestic violence in Iran (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
193	Curtis Culwell Center attack (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
234	January 2015 Île-de-France attacks (talk)	Merge
199	Mixed-orientation marriage (talk)	Merge
298	Amedy Coulibaly (talk)	Merge
260	Human rights in Pakistan (talk)	Wikify
124	Immigration and crime in Germany (talk)	Wikify
26	Domestic violence in Saudi Arabia (talk)	Wikify
62	Peter Cherif (talk)	Orphan
16	Rachel Hudson (talk)	Orphan
37	Kausalya Shankar (talk)	Orphan
215	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
59	2012 Kohistan video case (talk)	Stub
4	The War on Women (book) (talk)	Stub
13	Life with Billy (book) (talk)	Stub
6	Sarah Buel (talk)	Stub
28	Honour Killing (film) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For doing a large quantity of good cleanup work here, such as fixing refs and copy edits. Keep it up :) --IWI (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OMG! My first Barnstar!

I'm so pleased - genuinely. Thank you. I've developed an obsession with references ever since that first time someone had to clean up after me :) - I left it looking like a mass of tangled spaghetti. I'm tidier now. But I still can't spell........ --DSQ (talk) 19:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Your article creations and expansions have been very good also. Pottery Cottage murders was a good read. --IWI (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just twiddling with Pottery Cottage now! :) I've left it pretty much alone since I wrote it, it gave me a migraine - possibly overly ambitious for my first article, all that digging around in newspaper archives, but I didn't realize that when I started. Thanks for your positive feedback, I really do appreciate it. Banaz Mahmod is my fave - I'm pleased with that. --DSQ (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is very good too. I have translated Pottery Cottage murders into simple English here, by the way. Hope this is okay. --IWI (talk) 20:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]