User talk:Debiit
October 2016
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cheer Boys!! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cheer Boys!! was changed by Debiit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962693 on 2016-10-14T22:36:45+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
April 2017
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Satoshi Hino. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 01:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Your addition to Liberty Liberty! has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —Farix (t | c) 04:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Yui Yokoyama, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marie Konishi
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Marie Konishi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tatsuhisa Suzuki. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hi Debiit, you did not read the two revisions here and here, already the infoboxes are well corrected by these anonymities there is no need to continue reverting them because if you knew, they did not do page vandals anymore and by the way I see that you recently added the birthdate of Kōki Miyata without having any references, well I tell you something none of them were born in the 70s, 80s and 90s and since users rejected your revision in Japanese Wikipedia. Do not throw away and re-create editions like this as is the case yours for example 1, you have to avoid the war of editions with me or we reach an agreement, okay. 148.0.120.121 (talk) 05:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Noriaki Sugiyama. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jingai-san no Yome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chie Nakamura. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Debiit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Debiit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)December 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)- Dearest NinjaRobotPirate, I've notice that the IP always ends up running to you for "help" and he makes me look like the villain in the history. Before you make more bad accusations against me, let me tell you that the IP is a cross-wiki vandal who always deletes/changes the birth dates of voice actors and artists in all the Wikis because he wants it that way, as you can see in here. You accuse me of violating the biographies of living persons policy, but the one doing it is actually him, I'm just undoing his changes. Debiit (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have no idea whether the IP editor is a cross-wiki vandal or not. What I see on English Wikipedia, however, is that you're edit warring to add unsourced birth dates, such as this edit. If you want add a birth year, you have to cite a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, do not believe that it says about the birthdate of these Japanese voice actors and artists. Debiit knows very well what he did was to support the vandalism carried out by the cross-wiki vandals that were passed through IPs that insisted on adding birth dates without indicating any source and in the end, this user does not understand several messages that the actors were not born in the decades and has evidence, of course not, the truth is that this insists on adding them by taking some websites such as Anime Network, MyAnimeList, behindthevoiceactors.com, etc. and how can you see this message, he thinks that the only thing he did is vandalism in all of the entire Wikipedias, including Spanish, and we tried to correct it several times, but he continues with his reversion of pages and never reached an agreement. 148.101.40.182 (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- 148.101.40.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), since you enjoy so much going against me and making me look like a fool, let me clarify you that you are not better than me, in fact, you are worst in every possible way. In Wikipedia there is something called use common sense, and we are talking about articles that have been on this site for several years without nobody deleting the birth dates, until you came and started doing it because you can and you WANT. You are the cross-wiki vandal because you do it in every Wikipedia, not only in this. Debiit (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Debiit, I am not better than you, the articles that were created in Wikipedia in all these years was because many of the users had mistakenly added the same birth data of these voice actors, and realizing that they should not add them to the page without having consulted the artist in any personal blog in Japanese how many years he has. You do not see it, you are guessing it, the cross-wiki only added the birth date to influence you by making you believe that the invented data is real, besides what you saw in the Google search and all the websites can not be kept that way, I'm not a vandal cross-wiki as you say because at your point you insist on keeping it your way. 148.101.48.102 (talk) 20:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- 148.101.48.102 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I know you are a Spanish speaker, so your English is absolutely awful. Learn how to speak the language before starting to giving me sermons as if you were right, because you're not. And also, stop giving pathetic excuses like the one above and many others, you are not convincing anyone with "many of the users had mistakenly added the same birth data". Debiit (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Debiit, I'm just telling the truth and the truth is that you can not talk to you for a single second. See source here, here, here and here. PDTA: certainly I speak Spanish but I learn to write in English and I am not making excuses to say that you are wrong because sometimes I am very incomprehensible in English. 148.101.48.102 (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- 148.101.48.102 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I know you are a Spanish speaker, so your English is absolutely awful. Learn how to speak the language before starting to giving me sermons as if you were right, because you're not. And also, stop giving pathetic excuses like the one above and many others, you are not convincing anyone with "many of the users had mistakenly added the same birth data". Debiit (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Debiit, I am not better than you, the articles that were created in Wikipedia in all these years was because many of the users had mistakenly added the same birth data of these voice actors, and realizing that they should not add them to the page without having consulted the artist in any personal blog in Japanese how many years he has. You do not see it, you are guessing it, the cross-wiki only added the birth date to influence you by making you believe that the invented data is real, besides what you saw in the Google search and all the websites can not be kept that way, I'm not a vandal cross-wiki as you say because at your point you insist on keeping it your way. 148.101.48.102 (talk) 20:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- 148.101.40.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), since you enjoy so much going against me and making me look like a fool, let me clarify you that you are not better than me, in fact, you are worst in every possible way. In Wikipedia there is something called use common sense, and we are talking about articles that have been on this site for several years without nobody deleting the birth dates, until you came and started doing it because you can and you WANT. You are the cross-wiki vandal because you do it in every Wikipedia, not only in this. Debiit (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, do not believe that it says about the birthdate of these Japanese voice actors and artists. Debiit knows very well what he did was to support the vandalism carried out by the cross-wiki vandals that were passed through IPs that insisted on adding birth dates without indicating any source and in the end, this user does not understand several messages that the actors were not born in the decades and has evidence, of course not, the truth is that this insists on adding them by taking some websites such as Anime Network, MyAnimeList, behindthevoiceactors.com, etc. and how can you see this message, he thinks that the only thing he did is vandalism in all of the entire Wikipedias, including Spanish, and we tried to correct it several times, but he continues with his reversion of pages and never reached an agreement. 148.101.40.182 (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have no idea whether the IP editor is a cross-wiki vandal or not. What I see on English Wikipedia, however, is that you're edit warring to add unsourced birth dates, such as this edit. If you want add a birth year, you have to cite a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Source for being censored?
[edit]Thank you for creating Men with Sword. Can you add a source to verify the series was indeed censored? After referencing it, the topic could make for an interestign WP:DYK (see T:TDYK). Keep up the good work! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Lullabying. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shouta Aoi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lullabying (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted images
[edit] Hello, I'm Lullabying. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. The image Takuya Eguchi that you uploaded appears to be copyrighted content borrowed from another website. If you are the copyright holder and would like to use this image on Wikipedia, please follow the instructions given at WP:DONATEIMAGE. This will start the process to get an OTRS ticket in place on the item proving that Wikipedia has permission to use it. The image should be uploaded to Commons, not directly to Wikipedia, so you will need to open a user account on that wiki as well. This may sound complex, but hopefully if you take it step by step it will go smoothly. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! lullabying (talk) 20:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I've been noticing you've been taking screencaps of live streams of Japanese actors and uploading them to Wikimedia Commons as "own work." Please don't do that -- this is copyrighted content and should not be uploaded under that category. Please upload them as "fair use" instead. lullabying (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Rainbow Without Colours
[edit]Hello, Debiit,
Thanks for creating Rainbow Without Colours! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
The 'vietnamnews.vn' source gives the film significant coverage - the other articles are passing mentions about the awards. I think the awards probably get it over the bar in terms of notability, but an additional review in a reliable source would help confirm this.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
GirthSummit (blether) 16:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Bungo Stray Dogs
[edit]Thanks for editing the character lists. Feels nice when more people help to expand the Bungo articles. By the way, I'm planning to nominate Atsushi Nakajima (Bungo Stray Dogs) to GA but my prose is not very good. Could you give it a look? I already asked help for copyeditors but maybe having an editors who knows about the series might also help. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nice work. For some reason, I have never found anything about Atsushi's English actor. Also, do you understand why only Atsushi and Dazai got articles right? They need real world information explaining how the authors came up with them and as well as how the media received them. For some reason Asagiri only talked about these two in an early interview. There is also Chuya but I think there is not enough information to create a nice article. Same with Akutagawa and Kyoka who get a lot of attention from the media but the authors don't talk too much about them. If in the future, Asagiri has more interviews about the characters' creation, we might be able to create new articles. At least that's how I did when creating new articles for D.Gray-man's protagonists as the series has some guidebooks with interviews. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted images (September 2019)
[edit] Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did at Shouta Aoi. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. lullabying (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Platero and I
[edit]Hi - I just reviewed Platero and I, and I'm afraid that I found a significant chunk of it seemed to have been copied and pasted directly from one of the sources. I found it necessary to remove that, and to request a copyvio revdel (which basically means that an administrator will remove previous versions of it that contained the copyright violations) - I did a bit of rephrasing where I could to avoid close paraphrasing, but I'm afraid that a sizable chunk of the 'History' section is now missing. If you'd be prepared to rewrite that in your own words, it would improve the article immeasurably. Thanks for creating the article, and for your work here - I hope you don't mind the interference with your work, but we really can't allow violations of copyright law in our articles. I'm about to put a templated message on your page which will contain some more links and information about this - I hope that will be useful for future reference. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 19:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Debiit, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Platero and I have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GirthSummit (blether) 19:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Copyright violation
[edit]Your article creation at Yarichin Bitch Club shows that you have copy-pasted the plot summary word-for-word from this article. Please do not do this, as this is copyright violation. lullabying (talk) 04:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Lullabying, I didn’t copy the plot from ANN, I translate it from the Spanish Wikipedia article, which I created as well. The article in question was created in 2016, long before the ANN’s, you can check it if you want. So please restore the plot and don’t accuse me of stealing again. Debiit (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- I went back to double check. The English article was created in 2019 and the article I linked you was written in 2018. The Spanish article also is also phrased differently to the English article... people have numerous ways of translating and the fact that your article and ANN is word-for-word the same thing makes it hard to believe that this was a coincidence. lullabying (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Lullabying, I created the original Spanish article back in 2016, it was the first article about the series in all the Wikipedias. By that time the series wasn’t that well know, ANN didn’t even had an article featuring it so I completed it on my own, using my own words. The plot I used in the English article is a translation of the plot I wrote in the Spanish article, my plot. I don’t know why ANN has the same, most probably they copy it from my Spanish article since it was the only relaying source (also, I think other user changed some words afterwards, since It used to be the same in both articles). So please restore it. Debiit (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- I linked you both article histories from their creation -- no one has edited them besides you in the article history. This is how it looked around the same time you made the English article. The sentence phrasing is different from the English. I'm not going to make assumptions about how ANN acquires their sources but it doesn't change that the text is the same word-for-word and that ANN's article predates the English article by half a year. You are free to write a new summary but we cannot use the current summary as of now. lullabying (talk) 16:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Fine, it’s no use to argue about this. I'll write another plot once I can edit again, following the Spanish plot. Debiit (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Takuya Uehara
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Takuya Uehara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuya Uehara (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Debiit
Thank you for creating Akiyama-kun.
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on Akiyama-kun, but note that other editors have called for more references, preferably from reliable media sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Undoing edits
[edit]Hey there, I had to undo some of your edits/page moves for several reasons:
- In the case of Takumi-kun and Sukisho, per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH English titles and names should be used. "Gui" was the spelling used in the official English translations of the manga given the summaries provided by the publisher, while a cursory Google search shows that Sukisho was distributed in English under that title.
- For Juri (model), sources refer to him as Juri only, so we should use that as the title too.
Let me know if you have questions. Cheers. lullabying (talk) 17:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit]
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--lullabying (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
BLP sources
[edit]Hi there, I had to remove information from Ray Fujita because you edited in information (specifically allegations of his birth name) onto the article without a source provided. Please remember that sources are important for things like this, and it has to be from a public reliable source (not documents that may violate WP:BLPPRIVACY). Thanks! lullabying (talk) 04:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)