User talk:Davidwalker1981

This is Davidwalker1981's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Davidwalker1981/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davidwalker1981! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Greenfield (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

External sources need to be removed or converted to inline citations. They mostly appear to be malformed attempts at references. Also, if they were converted to references, they need to verify the statements, for example the link after "Jessica's guitarist father, Robert Greenfield, also known as Roberto Campoverde" verifies the "also known" part, but makes no mention of their relationship.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jessica Greenfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jessica Greenfield has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jessica Greenfield. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jessica Greenfield has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jessica Greenfield. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 13:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Greenfield has been accepted

Jessica Greenfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi, I'm looking at the photograph you have uploaded to Jessica Greenfield. I see you have marked it as "own work", and that makes me wonder whether you have a conflict of interest regarding the article? It's well-sourced and her notability is clear, but if you do know her, represent her or work for her, please read the conflict of interest guidance. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No conflict of interest - I'm just a fan of Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds and given the man himself has his own page as you'd expect, I thought I'd start documenting the other members. The pic was taken by myself from the audience earlier this year. Thanks for the guidance though - useful to know. Davidwalker1981 (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]