User talk:Daviddayag

Welcome!

Hello, Daviddayag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David (Deddy) Dayag

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David (Deddy) Dayag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 23:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have deleted your draft because the only place you are allowed to write about yourself is on your own user page. You will NOT be allowed to link to your Youtube channel, blog, Instagram account or any other such content or to promote your skills, services, publications, recordings, etc. Deb (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Daviddayag. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Polyamorph (talk) 11:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Daviddayag! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I keep getting "you need consensus" but when i reply i get no response back., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daviddayag (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC) i honestly dont even understand how to reply to all those messages. and the fact that my questions are being deleted because no one replied or even seen them (no activity deletion) just means that the ux is not so good since i'm not the only one missing stuff here. why can we have a normal chat-like ux? thanks. i hope someone will read this.[reply]

That is one of the coolest images I've ever seen on Commons

I assume the issue is that you'd like to have this picture at the Sun? Previous discussions I found:

Btw, a discussion like this can take awhile, none of us are on WP 24/7 and we may be in different timezones. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there probably are some of us who are on WP 24/7, but they're crazy. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A possible objection to an edit like this [1] could be "Why are you putting a picture of sunspots in the sunlight section, it says nothing about sunspots?" Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks i actually did try a different place.

but this is impossible to edit. honestly

i need to know exactly what to do Daviddayag (talk) 20:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any way to assist?

I'd love to add my timelapse video to the page of sun.

I can add the original video of course, but you can see it here on my YT: [2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZSGq7WAzE Daviddayag (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding Andromeda Galaxy

Hello there. Recently you have engaged in an edit war on the article Andromeda Galaxy with CactiStaccingCrane. While I do understand your arguments and stances, we here in Wikipedia want to promote a healthy community of editors that engage in peaceful resolutions for edit conflicts.

I have raised a discussion here at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#Lead picture for Andromeda Galaxy and hence you are invited to join the discussion and resolve this matter, as well as engage with a wider audience since I think this is an important topic to touch on, regardless. Don't take this as something personal or a means to offend you, but still take this as a waening to avoid such behavior in the future. Regards! SkyFlubbler (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andromeda Galaxy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Again, it is best not to make changes to the lead picture for Andromeda Galaxy until the current discussion (in which you are already involved in it) has reached a consensus. Hope you understand. Thank you for reading. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 16:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 11:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Daviddayag reported by User:ZaperaWiki44 (Result: ). Thank you. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 11:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daviddayag. You've been warned for edit warring at Andromeda Galaxy per the noticeboard complaint. You may be blocked the next time you revert at Andromeda Galaxy unless you have first obtained a consensus for your change on a talk page. Your edits seem to follow a pattern of self-promotion of your own images. EdJohnston (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andromeda Galaxy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Daviddayag reported by User:FlightTime (Result: ). Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really

please take your prejudice fears and go play somewhere else, I'm reverting your edits because they're wrong, I don't give a shit where you come from. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you just proved my point.

"I don't give a shit where you come from" - you do. and you just proved it.

you didnt say why im wrong, i told you every page here every nebula or planet or star is processed, abnd you just ignored it.

so at least be true and say what's the real reason Daviddayag (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Andromeda Galaxy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Andromeda Galaxy) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have been edit warring off-and-on regarding an image at Andromeda Galaxy since May and your first edit after your edit warring block expired was to continue to revert without even an edit summary, your editing gives the impression that you do not intend to cease edit warring on that article, so you have been indefinitely blocked from editing that article until you can convince an administrator that the block is no longer necessary. I would very highly suggest reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before making an unblock request. - Aoidh (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]