Jump to content

User talk:Darth Stabro/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7

PUCPR

I've reverted your edit HERE for removal of cited material. To avoid other editors' reverting your edits, in the future simply add your contribution to the article without removing other contributors cited contributions. Mercy11 (talk) 07:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Betancourt Motto

Hi, I found it on the Archdiocese website along with his Coat of Arms. It's on the invite to attend the consecration: https://archdioceseofhartford.org/an-invitation-to-the-episcopal-ordination/


Roberto221 (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Aloysius R. Callaghan

Thanks for your work on Aloysius R. Callaghan.

I just reviewed the page, and tagged it as having some issues to fix, including this note for you:

The article looks like a good start, but it needs more references. The final paragraph of the Biography section currently contains zero references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

paul2520 (talk) 13:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darth Stabro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darth Stabro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Not admin topicon

Template:Not admin topicon has been nominated for merging with Template:Not an admin topicon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Interstellarity (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Convertfile.png

Notice

The file File:Convertfile.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Contact Form.png

Notice

The file File:Contact Form.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Loras College Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loras College Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:VandalSprayCan.png

Notice

The file File:VandalSprayCan.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Archdiocese SPM SVG BW.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Archdiocese SPM SVG BW.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, I have been helping with an effort to clear up false-positives in Special:WantedTemplates and found that 10 of the entries can be traced back to User:Darth Stabro/monobook.js. For example, if you check Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:" + "db-attack, you will see that the server is reporting that User:Darth Stabro/monobook.js is transcluding that template. Clearly this is a quirk in how the backend software parses javascript pages, but it makes it harder to find the real problem pages. It would be great if you could put 

// <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript>

at the top of the script page and 

// </syntaxhighlight>

at the bottom of the script page. Since these are commented out, it won't break the javascript, but it will prevent the backend software from parsing the {{" + "db-attack as a template transclusion. Alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin, I can delete the page for you (most editors are now using vector). Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NorthHennepin.svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NorthHennepin.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Doug Mahnke

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Doug Mahnke, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 2,100 edits since November 2009, you should be made aware by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you'd like to discuss this further, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:FlagOfFrance.svg

Notice

The file File:FlagOfFrance.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to c:File:Flag of France.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RecentUpdates

Template:RecentUpdates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Not admin topicon

Template:Not admin topicon has been nominated for merging with Template:Not an admin topicon. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Natsuikomin (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Flynn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coon Rapids Dam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Corps of Engineers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Coon Rapids Dam For DYK

If you haven't planned to already, I'd like to put Coon Rapids Dam up for DYK (furthest navigable point on the Mississippi isn't something to sneeze at). I can perform the nom and requisite quid-pro-quo but you can claim the credit for what's shaped up as a solid article. Let me know if this sounds good and I'll get right to it when I have a spare 15 minutes tomorrow. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 02:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
One thing that may be important in phrasing - technically one can't navigate further north than the Upper Saint Anthony Falls Lock and Dam because the lock is permanently closed to prevent Asian carp from spreading further upstream. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Coon Rapids Dam

On 20 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coon Rapids Dam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Coon Rapids Dam on the Mississippi River is the northern terminus of the river's navigable portion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coon Rapids Dam. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Coon Rapids Dam), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Complex/Rational 00:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

MOS:ORDER

Thank you for your nice article on Coon Rapids Dam. If I may offer just one suggestion, it is to follow the MOS:SECTIONORDER guideline regarding the Coord template. It seems that certain mobile operating systems can't handle the Coord template being near the top of the article, which is why MOS:SECTIONORDER wants it placed either in the Infobox, or just above the Categories at the bottom of the page. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 20:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 18:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

DYK for 8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States)

On 23 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1938 Catholic procession featured 80,000 marchers and one blimp? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Patrick J. Hessian

Hello! Your submission of Patrick J. Hessian at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 01:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Patrick J. Hessian

On 20 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patrick J. Hessian, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Patrick J. Hessian (pictured), the 16th Chief of Chaplains of the United States Army, earned the Soldier's Medal for disarming a suicidal soldier who was holding a live grenade with the pin pulled? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patrick J. Hessian. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Patrick J. Hessian), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Nice work on this article! Congrats on the DYK! BusterD (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 18:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Francis W. Kelly

Hi! Saw your DYK for Patrick J. Hessian. Thought you’d might be interested in Draft:Francis W. Kelly. Best, Thriley (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll take a look and see if I can help expand it when I get some time. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 18:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
No pressure! I was going to put it into article space as stub but thought to ask in case you were interested. Thriley (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Did a bit of work this morning! I'm going to try to get ahold of some physical sources to expand it a bit more before pushing it to mainspace and doing a DYK nom. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Looks great!! Thriley (talk) 17:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
published and nominated for DYK. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 05:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Mucoromyceta

Mucoromyceta (the article I just made) is I agree is really short more stuff to add so soon I’m going to add more. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)


New page reviewer granted

Hi Darth Stabro, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 16:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Another new page reviewer is thing of rare beauty. Congratulations, and good for us! Ask for help; expect to make a few errors at first. We're rarely in a hurry at NPP but don't be afraid of blazing through a few reviews to establish a performance pattern. You're never alone and there's always somebody around willing to help. If you get in a spot, sing out. BusterD (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for joining NPP, @Darth Stabro! Please remember to observe WP:NPPHOUR when tagging pages for deletion, especially when it comes to ones like WP:A7, which might be resolved simply by giving the author more time. There's so much stuff in the queue, so there's no rush to hit the stuff at the very front. -- asilvering (talk) 04:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald L. Rutherford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3rd Infantry Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

 A can of Moxie for you
Thriley has given you a refreshing Moxie! Moxie is soft drink flavored with gentian root extract created around 1876 as a patent medicine called "Moxie Nerve Food." It is the origin of the word "moxie", a noun meaning energy, determination, and spunk.

Fantastic work on Francis W. Kelly. Cheers!

Thriley (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Metnet (website)

Notice

The article Metnet (website) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Creator of the article from 14 years ago here - this website is now dead and has no significance, and even when it was live it didn't really have much significance and probably shouldn't have existed in the first place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Horror mystery film AfD

Hi there. I noticed you deleted the AfD template from an article you nominated, then draftified it. I believe the correct step is to withdraw your nomination (following WP:NACD), then draftify the article, rather than draftifying an article under active discussion. I did a procedural close of the discussion since the mainspace page had already been speedied, but leaving this comment for the future. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 21:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
You are an experienced editor but I guess you don't have much familiarity with how AFDs work. Once you have started the discussion, you can't just untag the article and call it to an end and draftify the article. That is not your decision to make, if an article is draftified, it should come from a consensus of AFD participants and was highly out-of-order. As Dclemens1971 says, if you change your mind about an AFD you started, post a statement under your nomination stating you withdraw your nomination and an uninvolved editor will close the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

I did explain my removal

I definitely explained why I removed it Kt925 (talk) 19:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

You need to give some sort of evidence as to why it is irrelevant. An arrest of a celebrity is relevant information. If he was found not guilty or charges were dropped, the article should have that listed rather than just deleting the information. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 19:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
This person brought up a business he no longer owns, and then was shut down due to covid, just to needlessly bring up his arrest. It’s completely unnecessary information. Not everything about a persons life needs to be included Kt925 (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
After reviewing WP:SUSPECT, I think you are correct in this case. The crime is fairly minor and irrelevant. My apologies; go ahead and revert my reversion. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 19:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Kt925 (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Nonetheless, please take a look at WP:MINOR; your original edit was tagged as a minor edit, which is reserved for small edits that could not possibly be the subjects of disputes, like spelling, grammar, reverting vandalism, etc. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 19:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Oh okay, I will Kt925 (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

untitled

Hello, please do not revert my changes for no reason, thanks 86.24.74.141 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Your changes are fairly patently vandalism, as stated on your talk page. Continuing to vandalize the article will result in a ban. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 20:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Minor edit

Ok. I have understood the difference. I will take it into account. Pinshiulo (talk) 06:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Removing a redirect

The redirect from Bernard Patten to Bernard M. Patten should be removed - how is this done?
Bernard M. Patten should be added to Patten (surname).

Cybernetic Pilot (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Until a page actually exists for Bernard C. Patten, there is no reason for there to be a disambiguation page and the redirect should remain. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 14:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Understood! Cybernetic Pilot (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

David Stirling Birthplace

Official verified citations:

https://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/doune/stirlingmemorial/index.html

https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/david-stirling

https://douneanddeanston.com/david-stirling/

https://www.britannica.com/biography/David-Stirling

Thanks. 109.145.3.232 (talk) 22:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

howdy @109.135.3.232: please add those references as you change the information on the page, per WP:REF, and then everything will be good to go. Thanks! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 22:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Patrick J. Ryan (chaplain)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patrick J. Ryan (chaplain) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of HistoryTheorist -- HistoryTheorist (talk) 01:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Darth Stabro. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

withdrawing AfD / closing discussion on sanewashing

I am not exactly sure how to do it, but I think this gives an example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Closing_discussions#Writing_a_summary

Thanks. 72.14.126.22 (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh, nevermind. Looks like the AfD has been closed now. 72.14.126.22 (talk) 04:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Francis L. Sampson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Francis L. Sampson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 22:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Francis L. Sampson

The article Francis L. Sampson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Francis L. Sampson for comments about the article, and Talk:Francis L. Sampson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For going above and beyond in the review process for Francis L. Sampson. I couldn't find an appropriate barnstar so I thought I would award you the special barnstar. I appreciate that you took the time to email me the sources when I couldn't access them! IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Gopnik edit

Ultra MAGA says "Back off!" 2601:842:281:2F00:CD30:A0D:A35D:2B08 (talk) 00:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

His name is Longbottom, to you.

His name is Longbottom, to you. 94.1.176.253 (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello there Mr/Ms. Darth Stabro

I can see you have reverted all of my edits I understand your reasoning for this I will do better and try to cite a reliable resource next time is there anything else about my reverton that caused it thanks. Idek mann (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks Idek mann (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks mate also for the Lunchly page I know this might take time you really don’t have to do it but could you possibly look over the edits I made on my final edit of the Lunchly page I kind of want to keep some parts for what I did for it you don’t have to. I know you’re a busy admin i’m just a new amateur editor who just wants to help. Once again you don’t have to Idek mann (talk) 00:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Here it is you could (or not) look over it if you like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lunchly&oldid=1251943432 Idek mann (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Darth_Stabro/Archive_7&oldid=1258205654"