User talk:Dariakupila

Dariakupila, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dariakupila! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concord Orchestra has been accepted

Concord Orchestra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Concord Orchestra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concord Orchestra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concord Orchestra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bradv🍁 15:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dariakupila! You created a thread called What to do after deletion of the article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Concord Orchestra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Concord Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Concord_Orchestra. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hug^syrup 17:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello Dariakupila. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dariakupila. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dariakupila|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I do not have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic. I don't believe I am that good to be hired :) I would like to provide valid information about the subject I like and am interested in. Dariakupila (talk) 19:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That’s all well and good but I hope you see how one can get that impression. I suggest finding other topics to edit to show you are here to build the encyclopedia. Writing articles is hard and I strongly suggest doing normal editing before attempting. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HickoryOughtShirt?4. Yes, I understand. I will gladly do editing of other articles as you suggest. Is it okay to edit similar articles about musicians? Do you think it is possible that you could restore my article if I edit other articles as well? This is my first article and it would be nice if all my efforts were not in vain. I also would like to be able to put more information into it in the future. Thank you. Dariakupila (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The point of editing outside this topic is to show you care about editing Wikipedia besides this topic. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HickoryOughtShirt?4. Thank you. Yes, point taken. For example, I can edit and/or translate into English already existing pages in other languages?