User talk:DanyloPushkar

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

It seems you have lately edited some article which is linked/ connected to Black sea article. Please do have a look at Talk:Black Sea#Coastal cities, requesting help; and help expand Black Sea#Coastal and port cities on Black Sea coast and trade.

Also requesting to visit Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları, an article is about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times; and help expand the same if you find yourself interested in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT WARRING NOTICE

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.(KIENGIR (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You are on a trajectory which usually ends up with a swift block--Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am reverting pretty much all of your edits. Please discuss at talk pages.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: I don't think he listened to your advice. Mellk (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this person is not catching on to the whole "discuss" thing. This is supplemented by the use of such language in edit summaries as "There is nothing to discuss" and "indisputable". DanyloPushkar, "Because I say so" doesn't work here. Largoplazo (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, apparently the user is only here to revert and not to make any useful contribution. They need to be blocked indef but unfortunately I can not be the one to block them. Could somebody please open an ANI topic? --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Haydamak, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your edit summaries says your edit was in line with Wikipedia standards--while you were breaking those standards be reintroducing material that had just been contested, violating the standards regarding arguing in articles and supplying sources. Do not appeal to "Wikipedia standards" when you don't know what they are. Largoplazo (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding information without references in numerous pages. Please read our policies WP:CITE and WP:RS. If you continue doing so despite warnings, you will be blocked from editing. Lembit Staan (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#DanyloPushkar on a reverting spree at your service. Please reply there.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]