User talk:Dana Joan Reynolds

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dana Joan Reynolds. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fred W. Glover, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help with Fred W. Glover page

Hello, I have a rather extensive list of the cited accomplishments of Fred Glover. The current page is outdated. I have posted them in entirety once, and it was removed because there was some unintended unicode being pasted with my text, so I re-typed it about half-way through, and when I returned today to finish, it was removed again as a COI violation. I am indeed related to Fred, however I believe my content was unbiased, and went through a lot of editing to ensure it was impartial. I would very much like this to be re-posted, because Fred's accomplishments are genuine and speak for themselves. I welcome any edits to remove any wiffs of nepotism, but I challenge anyone to find them! Thanks for any help. Dana Joan Reynolds (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dana Joan Reynolds! Thank you for your contributions. I am SW3 5DL and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SW3 5DL (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed your edits to Fred W. Glover and saw your request for help here on your talk page. The content you are posting might not fit our guidelines. I suggest you go to this page, here and ask for some help. Moonriddengirl is an administrator here on Wikipedia and also the go to expert on copyright violation. Ask her advice about your situation and edits. Usually, as long as your edits are sourced with secondary sources, your edits should be fine. SW3 5DL (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted new attempt at Fred W. Glover page

Hello Wikipedia helpers, I have recreated the Fred W. Glover page in my sandbox and have resubmitted it for review. I am not receiving compensation for my work on this page. My connection with Fred is that I am his daughter. Nevertheless, all entries are factual and cited. I welcome discussion where improvements may be made. The 'live' entries prior to my updates are outdated and incomplete. This work is to correct outdated material and to complete the record. Thanks, Dana Reynolds

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Fred W. Glover, from its old location at User:Dana Joan Reynolds/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Glover (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fred W. Glover and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dana Joan Reynolds, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fred W. Glover

Hello, Dana Joan Reynolds. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fred W. Glover".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dana Joan Reynolds/sandbox/Dana Joan Reynolds

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Dana Joan Reynolds/sandbox/Dana Joan Reynolds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 07:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]