User talk:Daffy123

Discussion at Talk:Michael Portillo#Infobox proposal

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Michael Portillo#Infobox proposal. Smerus (talk) 11:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Newsom

I saw you added DOB to Kevin Newsom. Just fyi, there's been some pushback from the judges on this issue to the Wiki admins, so we've stopped adding it absent a public source.Bjhillis (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This is the source. I'll add that on the page. Thanks for raising the issue.--Daffy123 (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Daffy123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ryan Wesley Bounds

Hi, I saw you added some biographical information to Ryan Wesley Bounds but I didn't see a citation. Could you please add the citation where you found the information otherwise it will have to be removed.

Thanks Snickers2686 (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Just added the reference. --Daffy123 (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Happy Holidays

This user wishes you a very Happy Holiday season.

Marquardtika (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please consider including edit summaries in future when contributing. It only takes a couple seconds and is very helpful to other editors. See the page here for more information. ToastButterToast (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justin Muzinich

The article Justin Muzinich has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chopping

Hi Daffy123 I know you like History like I do I will try to explane Chopping to you but if you want to get learn more about Chopping talk to Corkythehornetfan Well lets take Rick Perry for reference click on his name and look at the picture. and then go to the Political appointments by Donald Trump page and look at the Rick Perry picture there. the Political appointments by Donald Trump Rick Perry pic look smaller then the Rick Perry pic on his page. It helps make room on the Political appointments by Donald Trump page to add more pictures. But you have to talk to Corkythehornetfan he will explane it better thanks and I look foward to working with you.96.36.68.29 (talk) 18:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Virginia's 3rd congressional district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evan Jenkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Wardlow

Thanks for the edit to lede. I wanted to completely take it out of the lede, but I feared reversion so I made a compromise edit. Thanks again. Koncurrentkat (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daffy123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daffy123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gov

I’m using that photo as at its resoltuon on Wikipedia it looks fine and it looks similar to Lt Gov Nuñez photo and has the state emblem and flag , something that is normally in a official portrait Zzannoni1956 (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Mr X 🖋 22:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ron DeSantis

Where is this talk page ? For Ron DeSantis ,I haven’t seen it Zzannoni1956 (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Talk:Ron DeSantis, scroll down until you've reached a section called 'Desantis's photo.' --Daffy123 (talk) 17:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mylife.com as a reference source

Hi Daffy123. I stumbled upon a reference you had recently added that used mylife.com as the information source. This is not an appropriate reference source, because it is editable by third parties, by the subject of the page, and is aggregated from unknown and/or unattributed sources. The company does not guarantee the accuracy of the information. Please refrain from using it as a source in the future, most especially for biographical articles, where accuracy and attribution are critical. Thank you. Risker (talk) 04:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: I note that you've done quite a bit of work on articles involving US federal judges. A solid reliable source for the year of birth of US federal judges is The Federal Judicial Center, and you could safely count on that as a source. In this day and age of identity theft, birth year is sufficient for most biographical subjects. And the "official" reference source may be useful in expanding other biographical information as well. I hope this is helpful to you. Risker (talk) 05:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giovanni Spadolini.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Giovanni Spadolini.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 01:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Thanks a lot for this. Will definitely make my best use of it. Don't think I'll be an admin now but this will definitely help. Cheers. --Daffy123 (talk) 08:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes, be sure to look over the links of when to and when not to use 'rollback'. A similar set of tools for working with anti-vandalism can be found in the Twinkle gadget that you may enable. To learn even more about anti-vandalism check out the resources at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 11:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hi Daffy 123. Thanks for stepping up at RfA. Unfortunately it does not look like you are going to pass. As an experienced editor I would suggest that you consider withdrawing. Knowing when a discussion is not going your way and accepting the community's verdict is generally regarded favorably. And it may reflect well on your judgement and maturity if you decide to take another stab at this somewhere down the road. Please also note that the vast majority of the oppose votes are based mainly on your lack of experience. So I am not seeing any impediment to a future RfA. I would encourage you to read the comments and take them on board. In a year or two if you are still interested ask around. There are admins who would likely be willing to nominate you assuming there are no other issues. If you do decide to lower the curtain on this all you need to do is post a note under your nomination statement to that effect and maybe copy it over at WP:BN so the crats know to close the RfA. Just as word of caution though, if the support level remains well below 50% it is entirely possible that a crat may shut it down based on WP:SNOW. It almost always looks better if the candidate withdraws first. Thanks again for stepping up and best regards. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daffy123, I’d encourage you to withdraw this as well. At 33%, it isn’t going to pass. Thank you for volunteering :) TonyBallioni (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do withdraw it. If you're really interested in being an admin, what you need to do has been pointed out to you by numerous editors (including myself). Please read their comments and follow their advice, and show some respect for the obvious will of the community by withdrawing your RfA. Not doing so is going to look bad for you the next time you put yourself forward. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Pings

Just to let you know, the {{ping}} template only works if you sign your post. -- Dolotta (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Sorry you experienced such a bloodbath at RfA. Can I suggest you turn on "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" in Preferences - Editing. It's a great feature and you'll never miss one again. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay with the project

You tried and you got knocked down. Thank you for trying. Please pick yourself up, and continue editing. You received a lot of helpful suggestions about what you can do in the weeks and months to come to be more successful next time. If you ever need any frank advice, just reach out. I wish you well. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Hope to see you around soon. Best of luck, GAB^gab 01:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep Wikipedia can be brutal. You will make a great admin...if you stick it out! - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to leave a similar message, so I will just add my name to those above. I opposed your candidacy, but I would be happy to support you in future once you have more experience and with a bit more attention to detail in the RfA itself. I'd also suggest finding a nominator or two the next time you want to give it a go, rather than self-nominating. When I ran, I found that my nominators provided me with good advice before the RfA process started. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind message. I don't read my talk page often and I've just seen these now. I am still editing on Wikipedia and will continue to do so in the future! --Daffy123 (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I saw your recent RFA and while I did not participate, I wanted to tell you that you remind me a lot of myself. My first RFA had a lot of similar comments to what you received at yours. I feel like you and I have a lot in common - you go along doing your best to fix up the encyclopedia, trying to avoid drama, and focusing on making this place better. You, like me during my first RFA, don't have very much experience in the Wikipedia Space - that is to say, places that focus on the background tasks of making the encyclopedia run smoothly. I made this page for myself twelve years ago and it helped me remember where everything was. When I put forth my first RFA, I didn't even know what kind of things I didn't know - there are so many nooks and crannies that there are still things out there with which I'm unfamiliar, even after all these years.

If I might proffer a suggestion, I would recommend checking out WP:AFD and watch some of the discussions there. You'll see what kinds of articles are deleted from Wikipedia, and importantly, why they are deleted (for example, lack of notability). You can participate in those discussions, voting to keep or delete an article and why (based on policy) that action should be taken.

Another place would to check out would be WP:AIV. People (and bots) report users there who should potentially be blocked due to vandalism, personal attacks, etc. Administrators look at the contributions of those users to determine if they should apply a block and how long that block should be. You, too, can look at their contributions to see what kind of actions end up resulting in a block. Being that you're not an admin (yet), you can't actually perform the block, but you'll want to know what kind of activity is a "block-able offense" for lack of a better term.

There are lots of other places - take a look at my Helps page I linked above, if you'd like - to get a feel for some of the things going on. Not every administrator is interesting in doing the same kind of work, so you can find the sort of things you'd like to work on and make yourself more familiar with them. That being said, the "block" button and the "delete" button are given to every administrator, and many RFA voters will be more comfortable if you have a good handle on those two, so that's why I recommended familiarizing yourself with those in particular. Participate in AFD and if you happen to come across someone vandalizing Wikipedia, report them at AIV (after properly warning them). And so on.

If you ever have any questions or whatever, don't hesitate to reach out to me. Useight (talk) 22:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came to give some similar advice. Well done for having the courage to stand for RfA, which can be a bruising process. You seem to have survived it in one piece. Please stay involved and stay positive! – Fayenatic London 16:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind message. I don't read my talk page often and I've just seen these now. I am still editing on Wikipedia and will continue to do so in the future! --Daffy123 (talk) 19:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Thomas Homan. Content of this nature could be regarded as personal and private and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images That need updating on Wikipedia

Hi Daffy123, I saw that you have been adding the images of the members of the house of lords and house of commons to wikipedia, which I am so grateful for you doing. I saw that some articles still have older 2017 potraits, and I am not sure how to do it myself, so I was wondering if you might be able to add these images to their respective pages or would know someone who might be able to:

Official portrait of Lord Paul crop 2, 2019.jpg to Swraj Paul, Baron Paul

Official portrait of Lord Patel crop 2, 2019.jpg to Narendra Patel, Baron Patel

Official portrait of Baroness Falkner of Margravine crop 2, 2019.jpg to Kishwer Falkner, Baroness Falkner of Margravine

Official portrait of Lord Sheikh crop 2, 2019.jpg to Mohamed Sheikh, Baron Sheikh

Official portrait of Lord Loomba crop 2, 2019.jpg to Raj Loomba, Baron Loomba

Official portrait of Lord Suri crop 2, 2019.jpg to Ranbir Singh Suri, Baron Suri

Official portrait of Lee Rowley MP crop 2.jpg to Lee Rowley

Official portrait of Baroness Butler-Sloss crop 2, 2019.jpg to Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, Baroness Butler-Sloss

Official portrait of Baroness Donaghy crop 2, 2019.jpg to Rita Donaghy, Baroness Donaghy

Official portrait of Baroness Fookes crop 2, 2019.jpg to Janet Fookes

Official portrait of Baroness Wheeler crop 2, 2019.jpg to Margaret Wheeler, Baroness Wheeler

Thank you once again for all the images you have added :) 82.132.225.212 (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daffy123 (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

updating images on article

Hey, there is an article on Wikipedia called List of ethnic minority politicians in the United Kingdom, where the overwhelming majority of images of the politicians are out of date and I was wondering if you wouldn’t mind updating them with their newer versions, from their Wikipedia article. If you don’t have the time I understand but I’d really appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.247.73 (talk) 11:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American School Foundation of Monterrey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American School Foundation of Monterrey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adone Zoli-1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adone Zoli-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]