User talk:Da Vinci Nanjing

Greetings...

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too!) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Arbiteroftruth (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:German Fashion and Beauty Blog.JPG

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:German Fashion and Beauty Blog.JPG. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:German Fashion and Beauty Blog.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:German Fashion and Beauty Blog.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Williams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

movies in the Top 20 highest grossing films at the US Box-Office (adjusted for inflation).<ref>[http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm;</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced content from Jaws

Sinc eyou have been registed on Wikipedia since 2008 you should know better than removing sourced content from an article as you did at Jaws (film) as you did in this edit. Wikipedia is a WP:Verifiable encylopedia and it is not the place of editors to make judgments ove rthe factual veracity of content. I have started a discussion at Talk:Jaws_(film)#Second-highest_grossing_.22franchise.22_film to discuss the issue, so I hope you will participate rather than simply reverting. Betty Logan (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Your recent editing history at Jaws (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stephen King, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Nolan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

. His film ''[[The Dark Knight]]'' (2008) is regarded as the best Superhero Movie of all time.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/greatest-superhero-movies/</ref> Nolan has

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Home Alone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

' in 2011. It is the highest grossing Christmas Movie of all time at the North American Box office (when adjusted for inflation. <ref> http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm </ref>''Home

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Home Alone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

' in 2011. It is the highest grossing Christmas Movie of all time at the North American Box office (when adjusted for inflation.<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/picture-galleries/11309676/The-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Your recent edit to Solar eclipse involved content copied from Apollo–Soyuz Test Project. Please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and provide either a note on the talk page or at least in an edit summary in the future. Vsmith (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop edit warring on the World Trade Center (1973-2001) article. It is correct to say the documentary shows the towers - however, the film was shot long after the towers were destroyed and should not be quoted as the actual towers within the article. You may find yourself blocked from editing if you continue to make wrong reversals on Wikipedia. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Cameron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aliens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Home Alone

On the mojo source it shows that the film is #40 on the list. For you to say that it's the highest Christmas movie, you have to determine that the 39 films ahead of it are not Christmas movies. That's the WP:OR. To insert your material, you need to find a secondary source that directly supports it. Otherwise, it's just your opinion, even if the analysis seems straightforward to you.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Bach

The reason that all 3 sources in the Thomas Bach#career section in Thomas Bach are working is that I had (for the second time) corrected them. The way you left it, the third of your references had a reference http://www.zimm-recht.com/index.php?first=About%20me&second=Dr.%20iur.%20utr. which ends in a full stop, and most (if not all) browsers will assume that the full stop comes after the reference and will therefore try to find http://www.zimm-recht.com/index.php?first=About%20me&second=Dr.%20iur.%20utr (which does not exist). As well as formatting the reference so that the full stop is regarded as part of the url, I also removed the line feeds between the references to comply with the Manual of Style. I also noted that you had provided all 3 references as bare urls; it would be preferable if you could expand them appropriately. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Barkeep. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jan Frodeno, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The onus is on the editor to provide a reliable source for any fact being added to the article, especially to biographies about living persons. No original research. Barkeep^Chat 17:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Test upload.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Test upload.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hängeseilbrücke Geierlay a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hängeseilbrücke Geierlay. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.

Replaceable fair use File:Geierlay Bridge in the Hunsrück Area of Germany.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Geierlay Bridge in the Hunsrück Area of Germany.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Geierlay Bridge in the Hunsrück Area of Germany.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Geierlay Bridge in the Hunsrück Area of Germany.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Koblenz cable car a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Koblenz cable car. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page Koblenz cable car

Your requested history-merge could not be done, because Draft:Koblenz cable car had only one edit, and that edit was a redirect. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Workplace

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Workplace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:U2‎ that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil - Peru railway history-merges

Sorry :: there is nothing to do. Draft:Brazil - Peru railway has only 2 edits, and they are both redirects. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Experience + Innocence Tour

It's not that I don't want an article for the Experience + Innocence Tour, I want the article to meet notability criteria. As of now, it doesn't. The article has been semi-protected because of this. I'm sure that it will meet notability criteria (WP:NTOUR) soon enough, but it doesn't yet. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Creativity Index has been accepted

Global Creativity Index, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blind Booking

The article Blind Booking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is only a dictionary definition and does not establish notability of the concept, and is not otherwise encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 44/876 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 44/876 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/44/876 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlies Krämer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlies Krämer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlies Krämer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.49% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for March: Women's History Month (This event is a collaboration with two other wiki organizations: our article campaign supports Art+Feiminism, while our image campaign supports Whose Knowledge?) #1day1woman Global Initiative
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: `@wikiwomeninred`

--Ipigott (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerlinde Kaltenbrunner descending the Mount Annapurna 1 on.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gerlinde Kaltenbrunner descending the Mount Annapurna 1 on.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Portrait Ms. Marlies Krämer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait Ms. Marlies Krämer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

I have reverted you again as the two sources you added are not reliable. Please discuss this on the talk page. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rhonex Kipruto

I noticed that you added Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonex Kipruto to the Articles for Deletion log, but you didn't actually nominate the article for deletion. In fact, it looks like you want the article, which you created, to be kept. I recommend that instead of trying to submit the article for deletion and hoping it gets kept, you should just wait and see if anyone else nominates it for deletion. If so, you can vote to keep it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ASTERIG

I have moved the article ASTERIG back to draft space as Draft:ASTERIG. At present it does not appear to satisfy general notability guidelines because it does not include references to independent reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Almaz Ayana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2021 IAAF World Cross Country Championships moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 IAAF World Cross Country Championships, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AmericanAir88^(talk) 13:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 IAAF World Cross Country Championships has been accepted

2021 IAAF World Cross Country Championships, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elisabeth Wehling concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elisabeth Wehling, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kipchoge page and your edits

As far as your editing, I looked at a brief sample of what you've done lately. Here's some of your edit summaries:

"Yesterday I watched JP for the first time without dubbing in 1080p. On Sep 2, 1993 on it's first day of release, I went to the movies, to watch what became one of my favorite films. I value this day as much as the Aug 11, 1999 or when I held my little sister for the first time in my arms. When the T Rex is introduced, attacking the main characters, this is the best scene in movie history. No other movie can keep up with these minutes in terms of suspense and action choreography. Thx to P. K."

"Mo Farah made a wise decision for willing to defend his 10000 m title at the 2020 Olympics. It will be a kind of Cheptegei vs. Farah. Let's see what Kipruto and Kiplimo have to say about that."

Sharon Stone article:‎ "Because of the interrogation scene she became world famous"

I would add that all of these edits by you, and a bunch of others, were instantly reverted by other editors, and rightly so. I think you need to get a handle on what an encyclopedia is. It's not a place for publishing your deep thoughts about whatever subject enters your head. So I would advise you to stop doing that. And stop doing it at this particular article. Thank you. JimKaatFan (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JimKaatFan

I agree with your pov to use the edit summarys for what they are made for. I am very proud for most of my edits an Wikipedia so far, I don't wanna diminish my accomplishments on Wikipedia. From now on my edit summarys will relate to the changes I made not storys from 30 years ago.

Regards, Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elisabeth Wehling

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elisabeth Wehling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 08:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of community-authorized general sanctions regarding COVID-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

El_C 17:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

When you make an edit like this which severely misinterprets the source, to the extent that it gives misleading information, you are likely to find your editing privileges here swiftly curtailed. You also edit warred your contested content back into the article when it was contested. Please never do that again. --RexxS (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RexxS,

what do you mean by this:

"....You also edit warred your contested content back into the article when it was contested. Please never do that again...."

Regards, Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Da Vinci Nanjing:

You made this edit "According to a statement from German Chancellor on 15 March 2020, 60-70 % of the German population will likely be infected ..."]
Two minutes later, SandyGeorgia removed it with the edit summary "Non-MEDRS, not for medical content, and send that to German article")
Five minutes later, you re-added essentially the same content that had been challenged: "According to a statement from German Chancellor on 15 March 2020, 60-70 % of the German population will likely be infected ...

I assume that you understand what "Please never do that again" means.

So, are you trying to tell me that you can't see the edit-warring? WP:EDITWAR tells you that "An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring", and Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 are in force, which means that there is likely to be zero tolerance of any deviation from best behaviour.

Please don't form the impression that because you only have received a warning so far, you can re-insert challenged material into an article that's under discretionary sanctions. You can't. --RexxS (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination for AfD

I understand that's not the most important point in the ongoing pandemic, but why would you delete an article about something people are trying to take care of? JTZegers (talk) 13:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konstanze Klosterhalfen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Athletics schedule legend Olympics 2020

Template:Athletics schedule legend Olympics 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Melat Yisak Kejeta

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melat Yisak Kejeta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Josi Neumann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Josi Neumann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 17:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Josi Neumann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Josi Neumann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JalenFolf

The article includes 3 independent reliable sources, do you doubt this? Da Vinci Nanjing (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Josi Neumann

The page Draft:Josi Neumann has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:G8, redirect to non-existent target

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josi Neumann (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has not achieved in an international competition - regional (European) only.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josi Neumann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Josi Neumann 2

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josi Neumann 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Josi Neumann

Hello, Da Vinci Nanjing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josi Neumann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jakob Ingebrigtsen

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jakob Ingebrigtsen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]