User talk:Daß Wölf

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 15 sections are present.

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

DYK nomination of Pero Pirker

Hello! Your submission of Pero Pirker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 00:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pero Pirker

On 6 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pero Pirker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mayor Pero Pirker was largely forgotten despite leading recovery and rebuilding efforts after the devastating 1964 Zagreb flood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pero Pirker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pero Pirker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1964 Zagreb flood

On 6 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1964 Zagreb flood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mayor Pero Pirker was largely forgotten despite leading recovery and rebuilding efforts after the devastating 1964 Zagreb flood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pero Pirker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1964 Zagreb flood), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 Zagreb flood

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1964 Zagreb flood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 Zagreb flood

The article 1964 Zagreb flood you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1964 Zagreb flood for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964 Zagreb flood

The article 1964 Zagreb flood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1964 Zagreb flood for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 02:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Script means your signature is covered

I'm not suggesting you need to change your signature, just an FYI.

— Qwerfjkl talk 19:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerfjkl: Thanks for letting me know. It could be because I use background-clip: text to create the colour gradient. Unfortunately, I don't know any better way to do this effect. Daß Wölf 17:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Untitled Fast & Furious sequel" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Untitled Fast & Furious sequel has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 1 § Untitled Fast & Furious sequel until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 07:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 25 § Slovenian Wikipedia categories

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 25 § Slovenian Wikipedia categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 18:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Central European floods

On 20 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Central European floods, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 04:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The In The News Barnstar
		For your fantastic work on 2024 Bosnia and Herzegovina floods and 2024 Central European floods. Cheers! GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Bosnia and Herzegovina floods

On 5 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Bosnia and Herzegovina floods, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 22:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi The Wölf. I quite literally cannot read your signature. You have a -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;. Please remedy this. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 23:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DatGuy, are you using any uncommon userscripts or an unusual browser? The colour gradient renders perfectly on every device I've seen my signature on thus far; only the typeface ends up looking strange sometimes. Daß Wölf 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems it was my old mark-blocked script that added an opacity: 0.85. I remain suspecting that styling your signature with these attributes has a high likelihood of leading to issues, but alas. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 18:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It happens, I have a lot of scripts too. Another user also left me a message about the signature several months ago. I don't mind changing it, but I never figured out a different way to give it multiple colours within the length limit (apart from changing colours vertically, i.e. per letter), and it doesn't seem to have affected others in several years of active editing. Daß Wölf 18:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]