User talk:Cyberpower678/Archive 77
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cyberpower678. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 70 | ← | Archive 75 | Archive 76 | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 |
Your administrative action
Hello Cyberpower678, please take a moment to review the Wikipedia:Blocking policy - specifically the WP:NEVERUNBLOCK section and its footnote, in relation to your action in Special:Redirect/logid/117573904. The policy was updated regarding this in November 2018. Thank you for your attention to this matter. — xaosflux Talk 16:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xaosflux, that seems rather excessive as a policy. Was this policy change discussed somewhere? I think it silly to sanction an admin that responsibly undoes a block to observe for bot misbehavior. In the bot did not misbehave after it was unblocked. Seems like this would be a good case for WP:IAR. I don’t see any discussion anywhere that disallows an admin from unblocking their own bot after they rectify the issue or observe the bot for further misbehavior. So I’m curious about what the justification was to adding it to policy. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 16:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nyttend added it, with comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Blocking_policy/Archive_23#Unblockself . I know there have been discussions about selfbot-unblocks before but none ready-to-hand. –xenotalk 17:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xeno, that doesn’t really affirm that this is a supported change by the community. I get why admins should be disallowed from unblocking themselves, but I I completely disagree that this should be extended to admin-owned bot accounts. At the very least it should be allowed with heavy sanctions for clearly inappropriate unblocks.
- No position for or against right now: just pointing out it looks like a bold (but notified) addition that was not there before. –xenotalk 18:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- I will refrain from unblocking my own bots going forward, but I strongly feel an RFC is needed here. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 17:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xeno, that doesn’t really affirm that this is a supported change by the community. I get why admins should be disallowed from unblocking themselves, but I I completely disagree that this should be extended to admin-owned bot accounts. At the very least it should be allowed with heavy sanctions for clearly inappropriate unblocks.
- Nyttend added it, with comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Blocking_policy/Archive_23#Unblockself . I know there have been discussions about selfbot-unblocks before but none ready-to-hand. –xenotalk 17:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- It may be - I think this may have come about as precautions following remedies such as in this case (not saying that the same triggered applied here!). I'm in no way calling for any sort of sanctions against you here either. If you think this is bad policy, it can certainly be re-reviewed and amended if there is support - feel free to open a discussion and link to VPP. — xaosflux Talk 17:41, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xaosflux, Personally, if what Xeno says is true and the bot part was a bold edit to the policy, then I think, per WP:BRD, it should be reverted first and then discussed. I never even knew that bit was even added to the policy, and it's not insignificant. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- BRD kinda fades with time, since it was three years ago on a very watched policy page I'd suspect it is a little firmer now. INVOLVED also is at play for unblocking your own accounts - I'd rather see an actual affirmative statement that admins should feel welcome to unblock their own bot accounts to override that get passed. — xaosflux Talk 22:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xaosflux, Personally, if what Xeno says is true and the bot part was a bold edit to the policy, then I think, per WP:BRD, it should be reverted first and then discussed. I never even knew that bit was even added to the policy, and it's not insignificant. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Cyberbot AfD warning
Hey Cyberpower. I vaguely remember mentioning this a while ago, but maybe it got lost in the mix of things. When Cyberbot leaves a warning about removing AfD templates, the section title it uses is a bit unnecessarily verbose. It seems like the bot is using its edit summary as the section title. Could you check? — The Earwig (talk) 05:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Cyberbot I/Current AfD's not updating
Hi! User:Cyberbot I hasn't updated User:Cyberbot I/Current AfD's in a week. Is this a bug or has it intentionally been disabled? — MarkH21talk 12:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, it seems to be back now after the week hiatus. I wonder what caused that. — MarkH21talk 03:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot removing deadlink template
Hi Cyberpower678, I do not have a mediawiki account so am unable to report a bug there. In this edit IABot is removing a deadlink template from this link, which when clicked does appear dead. It is doing this without making any other changes to the article. Most of the FAQ is about the bot tagging a link as dead when it is not, but this seems to be the opposite problem. Best, CMD (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Old, invalid sig
This is ancient history and probably long since fixed, but on the off chance it isn't, your sig was invalid in 2015; it has been fixed here. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Cbnotalk
Template:Cbnotalk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Ask for help
hello sorry to disturb if possible please archive one of the references in the Indonesian Wikipedia article. Thank you Iylaq (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Internet archive bot
Just a heads-up, the IAbot has added the same ref to Electroconvulsive Therapy 30 times (see ref. 93) and I'm not sure how to fix that. You might want to give it a nudge. Thanks! - Syd (talk) 21:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
IABot
The IABot Management Interface is not working. It is not completing its task. Thanks.BabbaQ (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- BabbaQ, try again. There was a hitch with the DB. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 20:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. Thank you!--BabbaQ (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Removal of protection!
I feel the protection on page Rajendra Mahato should be removed. There is no risk of vandalism. Curious boy np (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Cyberbot I
Hello. Cyberbot I stopped updating the adminstats template on commons since 4 June, can you take a look? --Minorax (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot's percent-encoding of Chinese characters
Hi Cyberpower678 and Harej (talk · contribs). In this edit, InternetArchiveBot (talk · contribs) changed:
to:
which percent-encoded the Chinese characters. Would you modify the bot not to percent-encode the Chinese characters? I am not reporting this issue on this tool as I'm not comfortable creating an account on another website. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
IABot blocked message
IABot when "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)" is tagged reports "blocked: You have been blocked from editing." although I have not been blocked according to my account details. Best, Sam Sailor 11:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Blocked
IABot Console says I'm blocked. What gives? Elizium23 (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- (Talk page enjoyer) @Elizium23: it's a known issue/bug in the console. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, workaround/fix? Wait a while and try again? Transient failures? Elizium23 (talk) 20:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Elli, it’s not a bug with the console, it’s a bug with Wikipedia. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot at bgwiki
Please stop InternetArchiveBot at bgwiki until T283963 is resolved, now it makes more bad than good. Note as well T283964 and that type of encoding which is also unwanted. Thank you. --Nk (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Nk, it’s off —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot's percent-encoding of Chinese characters
Hi Cyberpower678 and Harej (talk · contribs). In this edit, InternetArchiveBot (talk · contribs) changed:
to:
which percent-encoded the Chinese characters. Would you modify the bot not to percent-encode the Chinese characters? I am not reporting this issue on this tool as I'm not comfortable creating an account on another website. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
https://web.archive.org/web/20210601043030/https://www.hk01.com/周報/198101/佛系青年-無人生目標-棄參與集會-社會如何使人-成佛
to:
Cunard (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Cunard, percent encoding is not really an issue per say. It’ll get resolved though. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is not that percent encoding will prevent it from getting resolved. The issue is that conversion of the Chinese characters into percent encoding makes the URLs unreadable which makes it harder to catch whether the wrong URL was used or to detect from the URL a summary of what a source says. Would you modify InternetArchiveBot not to percent encode these characters? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- In Nk's comment here in the previous section on your talk page, Nk wrote, "that type of encoding which is also unwanted". This is in reference to InternetArchiveBot changing:
- https://web.archive.org/web/20111004140141/http://xfactor.novatv.bg/people/view/12/Михаела-Филева/
- to:
- https://web.archive.org/web/20111004140141/http://xfactor.novatv.bg/people/view/12/%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0-%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0/
- I think this is a broader percent encoding issue involving Bulgarian and other languages too. Percent encoding these non-English language characters makes them less readable so it would be best not to percent encode them. Cunard (talk) 20:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is not that percent encoding will prevent it from getting resolved. The issue is that conversion of the Chinese characters into percent encoding makes the URLs unreadable which makes it harder to catch whether the wrong URL was used or to detect from the URL a summary of what a source says. Would you modify InternetArchiveBot not to percent encode these characters? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Please Help Me
Hi :@Cyberpower678: Please Help Me I Recently Going To Holiday, So I Use Your Statuschanger.js But he does not Work Please Help Me.Best Regards.Serious Black@Contribute 13:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- MXX8, I’ll look tomorrow —CYBERPOWER (Around) 20:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Cyberpower678:Thanks for Answering Me and I'm waiting you. ✨️Serious Black@Contribute 03:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! The book namespace is going to be deleted and all pages moved following Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Delete all books within the book namespace which will impact User:Cyberbot I/Book Reports. I would suggest just turning it off, I'm guessing it may have troubles dealing with an empty or deleted namespace. --Trialpears (talk) 08:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Trialpears, ok. I will disable it later today. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 19:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
COVID-19 pandemic
I was reading some "COVID-19 pandemic" articles that had hatnotes which were complaining about raw link references. Can User:InternetArchiveBot archive them? .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- 0mtwb9gd5wx, you can run the bot by visiting https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=runbotsingle and running the bot on your desired articles. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 19:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Bot interface translation in be-tarask
Hello. Despite I've prepared the InternetArchiveBot's messages translation into Bełarusan, looks like the bot isn't using them. Could You please explain what else does it need? --Renessaince (talk) 04:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Renessaince, I'm honestly not sure why you created a defunct configuration page, or how you even came about the old one to begin with, but you actually want to adjust the bot's configuration by going to https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=wikiconfig&wiki=be_x_oldwiki and putting your translations there. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 13:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- The link you provided says for me "Permission error" and "This permission is obtainable with the following groups: admin, root". So just to translate strings I should have admin's rights, am I? --Renessaince (talk) 04:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Cyberbot marking users with partial blocks as blocked at RfPP
Hey Cyberpower. I'm going through some RfPP requests and noticed that Cyberbot I left a comment that "This user who requested protection has been blocked." However the user in question has a partial block, imposed a month ago, from an unrelated page. Would it be straightforward for the bot to check to see if the block occurred since the request was made, or involved the same page, or something like that? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot is again percent-encoding Chinese characters
Hi Cyberpower678. We previously discussed InternetArchiveBot's percent-encoding of Chinese characters here. InternetArchiveBot has made a series of edits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) to percent encode Chinese characters again, including in articles where I had previously reverted the bot. The bot changed:
to:
Percent encoding these non-English language characters makes them unreadable. Would you modify the bot not to percent-encode the non-English characters? I do not want to have to keep reverting the bot when it makes these edits. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Global bot approval request for InternetArchiveBot
Hello!
I apologize for sending the message in English. Please help translate to other languages..
In accordance to the policy, this message is to notify you that there is a new approval request for a global bot.
The discussion is available at m:Steward requests/Bot status#Global bot status for InternetArchiveBot on Meta.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
question: does iabot does not work with template:r
i tried to find dead links on Elizabeth Campbell Fisher Clay, however bot run shows links analyzed as zero (0). i noticed that it contains references using template:r. please kindly comment. Agyaanapan (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Agyaanapan: I can only assume it has to do with the fact that the references are all inside of a reflist template. It's an interesting issue.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Stuck RfA
Could you have a quick look at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BusterD 2? I got pinged off-wiki to transclude it as I've done lots of RfAs now, which I've done, but the bot isn't picking it up, so I've had to hand crank the pages so it shows up. Something doesn't look right? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, really sorry to do this but I noticed Cyberbot I also flooded Russo-Ukrainian War, so I've blocked it as malfunctioning. I'll go and raise an appropriate noticeboard thread now. See Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Block of Cyberbot I. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Revert of InternetArchiveBot edit
I'm curious: for what reason did you revert this edit by InternetArchiveBot? Is there something wrong happening with IAB that we should be aware of? Thanks. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 05:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pyxis Solitary, A sysop accidentally changed the behavioral settings of the bot to preemptively link all URLs to archives, not just the dead ones. This was cleanup. You are free to restore the bot edit if you want though. —CYBERPOWER (Message) 05:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. I was wondering if IAB was having a meltdown that only those bts knew about. :-) Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 05:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot is again percent-encoding Chinese characters
Hi Cyberpower678. We previously discussed InternetArchiveBot's percent-encoding of Chinese characters here. InternetArchiveBot has made a series of edits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) to percent encode Chinese characters again, including in articles where I had previously reverted the bot. The bot changed:
to:
Percent encoding these non-English language characters makes them unreadable. Would you modify the bot not to percent-encode the non-English characters? I do not want to have to keep reverting the bot when it makes these edits. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- This happened again here. Would you modify the bot not to percent-encode the non-English characters? I do not want to have to keep reverting the bot when it makes these edits. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Greetings. The bot has not edited this page or User:Cyberbot I/Current AfD's since July 3. Time to give it a swift kick? Thanks. --Finngall talk 16:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Technical Barnstar |
Hi Cyberpower678, thank you very much for rewriting Cyberbot I to match the new structure of WP:RFPP!  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
|
report false positivies error
issue1: when i try to submit https://www.ruthborchard.org.uk/collection/suzanne-perlman/ it says "These URLs are already alive or have since been whitelisted and will not be reported: ". however it does not add archive version.
issue2: due to incorrect url "https://www.http://ruthborchard.org.uk/collection/suzanne-perlman/" it has added archive url as http. see diff. just bringing to your attention. -Agyaanapan (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, cyberpower678.
I'm sorry to read that you are a bit stressed. I hope things improve soon.
Your wonderful page/tool, User:Cyberbot I/Current AfD's, seems to have stopped being updated by User:Cyberbot_I, the last editing being:10:17, 3 July 2021 Cyberbot I talk contribs 143,864 bytes −2,859 Updating list of current AfD's. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
I am hoping you can fix it?
--SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- SmokeyJoe, it's currently disabled. Will get to it ASAP. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 07:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Cyberbot I malfunction
Hey. So, {{rfpp|ar}} is the only valid rfpp closure which Cyberbot I is now accepting — at this point, all the closed requests needs to have it manually added for the bot to want. Thanks! Regards, El_C 07:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- El C, please don't. I'm about to push a fix for that. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 07:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, it said you were offline when I posted that. Thanks for the fix! El_C 07:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Some error
There are some unnecessary sections in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection page, please check.. ITSSKV08 (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)
I am wondering why I might not want to use this option. So far I have done so rarely. BUT... I have encountered so many dead links that I have begun to expect that they all one day will die. Why then wouldn't I use this option? —¿philoserf? (talk) 01:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
iabot "requires the analyzepage permission" error
hello Cyberpower678 when i try to run on single page it shows "Permission error : The action you are trying to perform requires the analyzepage permission." 28july21 (talk) 06:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- 28july21, you're still a new user. You will need to be at least 10 days old to acquire the right to use the tool. You can have a look at https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=metainfo for information regarding interface permissions. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 06:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- hello Cyberpower678 as soon as i saw 10 edit count, i tried to use it!!! atleast 10 days is mandatory... -28july21 (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
2020 Summer Olympics medal table pending review
Hi! I saw that the page for the 2020 Summer Olympics medal table was locked so that autoconfirmed users had permission to edit without review. Despite me being an autoconfirmed user, it has put my edits of the page under 'pending review'. Is this a misunderstanding on my part or is there an error? Regards Lucky102 (talk) 12:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lucky102, if a user edited before you that has to be reviewed, then those changes made after that edit will also face review, regardless of who it is. I reviewer will need to come by and review the changes. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyberpower678 I understand, thanks for explaining! Lucky102 (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lucky102, you look like you would qualify for the reviewer group. You appear to have a trustworthy track record. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyberpower678 how would I apply for this group? I would most definitely be interested. Lucky102 (talk) 12:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lucky102, WP:PERM. There you can request for the permission. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyberpower678, applied, thank you! Lucky102 (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lucky102, WP:PERM. There you can request for the permission. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyberpower678 how would I apply for this group? I would most definitely be interested. Lucky102 (talk) 12:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Lucky102, you look like you would qualify for the reviewer group. You appear to have a trustworthy track record. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Cyberpower678 I understand, thanks for explaining! Lucky102 (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Thanks for the review
Thanks Cyberpower678 for reviewing!155.246.151.38 (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Linus Van Pelt
Hello, and thank you again for your work protecting pages from persistent vandalism. Where can I find a chart detailing the various tiers of protection that can be applied to a page? I'm asking in case the vandalism of the Linus Van Pelt article persists well into the protection period (expires 29 August 2021). It's a lot of the same thing (the IP users have been asked to desist), and I was wondering what the next step would be if things don't settle down after a reasonable time. At least the page is now being actively patrolled; thank you. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
RFPP|ar substitutes to "archive now", which doesn't yet trigger archival, at WP:RFPP
=== [[Kalaripayattu]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Kalaripayattu}}
'''Reason:''' Large amounts of vandalism and unsourced edits made by anonymous accounts. Requesting an increase in page protection level.[[User:Kalariwarrior|Kalariwarrior]] ([[User talk:Kalariwarrior|talk]]) 15:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
:Stale report. Let's assume this was "done" for a bot test. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 17:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection|Semi-protected]]''' for a period of '''42 seconds''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#semi --> [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 17:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' {{yo|Kalariwarrior}} One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 17:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:{{archive now}}<!-- Template:RFPP#arch --> [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 19:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' {{yo|ToBeFree}} One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 21:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|ar}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 21:40, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think this is related to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase, that for some reason is redirecting users to request protections there. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Tbhotch, yeah, that was the result of the 2019 discussion at WT:RFPP, which is finally being implemented – but the substitution of RFPP|ar is currently not interpreted by the bot. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Bad template links
I just made this change to fix links to Template:Admin_dashboard/Button_edit and many others. Unfortunately, relative links don't work when the page is transcluded elsewhere. I don't know if this will have any impact on your bot. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oh. Sorry, Plastikspork, my fault. I wasn't aware of this issue and hadn't thought about possible effects of the recursive transclusion. We'll need to wait for Cyberpower678 to restore your change, as the bot overwrites it automatically with a revision I had incorrectly declared "ready to be enforced". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- ~ ToBeFree, no problem, but hopefully this will be fixed soon? Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Typo on WP:RPP and gap in archive
The last section linking to the archive index ends with double curly apostrophes instead of double quotation marks. An attempt to correct this was automatically reverted by Cyberbot I (talk · contribs).
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.’’
Also, the archive for October 2013 is missing. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Interestingly, this seems to have been fixed. Can you confirm, LaundryPizza03? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, the archive page is still missing, though. I'll mark this section as "don't archive yet". The missing archive page may be a factual representation of an empty log for whatever reason; I'll need to look this up. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- The typo is indeed fixed now. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- LaundryPizza03, I’m more of a silent operator these days. I silently fix problems reported to me. :-) —CYBERPOWER (Around) 15:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- The typo is indeed fixed now. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
RPP clerking bug report
The bot removed an RPP request, but failed to move it to the appropriate subpage, here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Similar issue here: [1][2]. It looks like the bot should be shut off for this task for the time being. Regards, HaeB (talk) 11:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi LaundryPizza03 and HaeB, I guess the ideal solution would be fixing https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/twinkle/issues/1429 , for which a patch already exists. I have no idea how to push this to happen faster, however. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Thanks for this context about Twinkle, but I don't think it can be blamed here. Rather, the core issue seems to be a malfunctioning of Cyberbot I (a bot should never accidentally delete editor comments), admittedly triggered by the rollout of the RPP changes before phase 3 of your technical roadmap was completed. The bot should be shut off for this task until that issue is remedied. Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- The rollout of the page changes was part of the roadmap, phase 2. Updating the tools to use the new pages had to be done after creating the pages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Thanks for this context about Twinkle, but I don't think it can be blamed here. Rather, the core issue seems to be a malfunctioning of Cyberbot I (a bot should never accidentally delete editor comments), admittedly triggered by the rollout of the RPP changes before phase 3 of your technical roadmap was completed. The bot should be shut off for this task until that issue is remedied. Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi LaundryPizza03 and HaeB, I guess the ideal solution would be fixing https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/twinkle/issues/1429 , for which a patch already exists. I have no idea how to push this to happen faster, however. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
incorrect archive url
diff added incorrect website archive url for National Trust Collections. -28july21 (talk) 06:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Race condition, overzealous archiving?
User:Cyberbot_I archived my request for protection immediately after I made it:
This seems like a bug?
Intralexical (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- Intralexical, MediaWiki is not immune to race conditions. It would seem the user and the bot edited at the exact same time. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 07:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Cyberpower678: Ah, I see. My other thought was that I might have touched a corner case in the archiving code, hence I felt I should report it.
- So the system MediaWiki uses for detecting edit conflicts requires a certain window of time in between conflicting edits in order to work? Intralexical (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- I would assume so, but not a lot. I would venture to say that you and the bot happened to submit an edit at the exact same time and the bot's edit just was queued in after yours.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Cleaning up old sections
There are a lot of pages, such as Talk:Texas Tech University, where your bot has added lots of "External links modified" sections. On that page, they're from 2017, for example. Could you perhaps make a bot task to remove stale sections that are many years old? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Citation generation tools: Reftag link broken
I am not sure whom to contact .The link to Reftag is down.http://reftag.appspot.com/ link is not working and google books citation generator is not working. Who handles this Apoc2400 appears to be away.Thanks.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Undoing edit on RPP
Hello! Could you please undo my edit at WP:RPP? I didn't realize there was already a request to protect a page that I requested to be protected. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Greetings. May I inquire if a fix is in the works to get this report back online? Last report was July 3 and a lot of "bad" AfDs I could have caught and fixed early are now showing up at User:DumbBOT/TimeSortedAfD after languishing for an extended period of time. Thank you for your time and hard work. --Finngall talk 20:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- I believe Cyberbot is having issues with AfD's in general; I actually came here to note User:Cyberbot I/Current AfD's is also down. BilledMammal (talk) 04:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Citation generation tools: Reftag link broken
I am not sure whom to contact .The link to Reftag is down.http://reftag.appspot.com/ link is not working and google books citation generator is not working. Who handles this Apoc2400 appears to be away.Thanks.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Pharaoh of the Wizards, I don't even know what it is sorry. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 17:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
iabot failed to detect 404 on Michelle Hamer
iabot failed to detect 404 on Michelle Hamer. the problemtic URL. -28july21 (talk) 01:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Hawaii national soccer team
What is wrong? CSYZ 73 (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
InternetArchiveBot in the dewiki
Hello, I am Tenwhhile6, a German Wikipedian. (active in the German Wikipedia).
I saw that you are on the internet archivebot.
Unfortunately, the bot has not been active since mid-August.
Could you tell me why? Or fix the error?
Best regards
… TenWhile6 (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Reference issues (Indian websites/newspapers)
Hello,
There is a series of continuous minor errors/issues in several Indian language source citations. I have started logging Bangla for now at: User:Titodutta/Bangla. The issues include:
- incorrect marking of reference language (website is in Bengali, but marked as En-GB, or EN)
- adding unnecessary additional text after page title (not counted yet, but The Times of India does it often, where "Times of India" is added after a page title, which is a duplication of "publisher")
- clear formatting errors.
I am checking patterns now (for now only Bangla, then I can check other Indian languages). The issues which are 100% positive, could your bot fix those issues? I'll be very happy to explain all the tasks in details and to prepare list/check trials. --Titodutta (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedia admin! 🎉🎉🎉 111.65.71.215 (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
cyberbot I wrongly labeling me as blocked repeatedly
Hello. cyberbot I has been labeling me repeatedly as "blocked on Wikipedia" at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase after I asked for protection of a page. I am not blocked on Wikipedia, only on one page. Of course if it also labels people partially blocked I have no problem. But certainly it's malfunctioning since it's sending out the same messages. So I hope you can look at it. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 13:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Thank You!
To the operator of this bot, for coding it to reset the sandbox. Aequilaterum (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)