User talk:Curious boy np
June 2021
[edit]
Curious boy np (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(1)Fellow admins, I would like to bring it to your kind notice that I am new to Wikipedia still I have contributed lot for Wiki in various languages. If my action has created a problem I apologize for the same and request for an unblock! (2) I know I should not threaten or harass other editors. Actually,the message I sent in Talk of User:Teraiboy99 was not a harassment or threat by me. I had written it with the prospective that he should not make disruptive edits on one of the most popular pages of the country as it may create mis-understanding in Mass-public. Actually I was unknown with WP:TWINKLE and other policies of Wikipedia. I had requested protection for Nepali Congress. In mean time my request would be acceptable, the user made other disruptive edits on same article. This took me to a situation of what to do. I moved the article to draft so that it wouldn't create confusion in public. Later, I understood and reverted my step myself. I added a sock poppet investigation on that user and he was proved sock poppet. (3) I am non native English speaker. The warning I had sent in his talk was not a Legal threats. I didn't mean it! I ment I would complain the "authority" which as per me is admin's team and sock poppet investigation team of Wikipedia. I didn't mean any other thing and giving problem to that user. Yes, I thought Wikipedia is strict on providing only true and referenced information to public so it would block such sock poppet with all disruptive edits within a day! I may be wrong, so I won't repeat above things if I get unblocked. I expect you understood what I am saying. 4)Lastly, I would like to assure you that I am sorry for what I did lastly. Please keep in your notice that I would like to contribute more to Wiki in a healthier way in upcoming days. From next time, if unblocked now I will work in co-ordination with a senior editor or read policies of Wikipedia before any big step to be taken. Thank-you! Hope, I could convince youwith the truth still no pressure on you!
Accept reason:
User has promised not to engage in pointy page moves and to avoid being excessively hostile to other users(even vandals). They also recognize it is not acceptable to pretent they know a logged in users IP. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Curious boy np (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Curious boy np (talk) 06:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
To be clear the part of this that I considered harassment was you telling a logged in user that you had their IP. "I have catched your IP and its traced." The rest was not much of a concern once I realized by "authorities" you meant admins.
I did notice that you reversed your disruptive move prior to being blocked. It was still disruptive but does mitigate my concerns.
Any administrator can proceed with this unblock request using their best judgement without the need to consult me. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 06:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- The request is not perfect, but I don't think we should demand perfect PAG-based promises from editors who haven't had the time to learn them. As HighInBC says, the disruptive move was reverted by Curious himself before anyone had noticed it, suggesting he had realised that was a bad idea all his own. He let himself get baited by a sockmaster that created multiple socks to EW with him across articles, including with usernames apparently targeted to racially taunt him (User:Teraiboy99). Curious has acknowledged his mistakes in conversation with me above, and was even willing to agree to a topic ban in an area that he feels strongly about. More importantly, he's welcomed advice and guidance, and I intend to watch over his contributions for a period and provide him feedback, as well as advising him on best courses of action in handling disputes and adhering to content policies. It's worth taking a chance. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Okay I am going to accept the apology and the promise to behave better at face value. As Usedtobecool points out Unblocks are cheap and so are re-blocks. I will keep this page on my watch list and hope not to be made feel foolish for this unblock. Happy editing. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Also note that now that you are unblocked you are allowed to archive or blank the various templates related to your block. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello usedtobecool, which country do you belong to? I think Nepal or India.110.44.120.29 (talk) 16:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC) it's me curious boy np from IP.
- Hello, Curious boy np,
- Please log in to do any editing. You should log in to do all of your editing, whether or not you are blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- It seems they may have lost access to this account.
- Curious boy np since you are currently in good standing, if you are unable to regain access to this account it is allowed to make a new one. However if you edit in any of the areas you are previously involved you should post on your new user page that you are the same person as this account. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 01:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Now that you're editing again
[edit]I would like to be able to provide feedback and advice based on your editing, and answer questions if you have any. We can do it on this talk page, but dropping advice on talk pages often looks like dropping warnings. So, it may be preferable to set up a more private page for a more frank and more frequent conversation. I used to have one, or I should say, I still have it, if I need it, at User:Barkeep49/NPPSchool/Usedtobecool. I could set up one for you in my userspace if you'd be interested, or in yours. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)