User talk:Cyberpower678/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

Senior Editor II

Yuer3677

Hi,

I konw you are the main developer of X! tools, I'm wondering how you get the data of pages and users. I'm doing a research work on wikipedia, and I user MediaAPI to get the data, but there is a little difference between the data got from api and the data showed on the X! tools website. So, could you please explain why and give me some help about the data? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuer3677 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

The information given to you by the API uses an extension that isn't very reliable in counting a users edits. xTools scans the database directly and counts each revision the user made to achieve a more accurate edit count.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 13:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

How do you tell people you are offline?

My user page tells people whether I am offline or online, but I usually don't remember to update it. Your notice is what I need.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

It uses a lot of complex templates. I'm not sure if I can explain that to you.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 21:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your presence is requested at The Teahouse

I don't know how to answer this question but no one else has.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Problem solved. Others have answered the question. Sorry I ended up editing the wrong thing when I tried to see how you let people know you were online.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata adminstats

Hey there, I just wanted to let you know that there was a problem with your bot's last round of updates on Wikidata. "X is not an administrator or an account creator. Therefore they have been disallowed the use of adminstats." This was the cool status update for all of us admins this morning using your otherwise great bot-powered template. Probably a gremlin in the works, I just wondered if it should update normally for the next round of updates? Jared Preston (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

An API call listing the admins probably returned blank data. Should be just a glitch and return to normal on the next run. :p—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 21:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Update needed

Hi cyberpower678, would you be so kind, to update the links in dewiki at Xtools. At the moment there are redirects. Thanks --Partynia (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Maintenance of xTools is currently halted pending a move to its new and, hopefully, permanent home.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 15:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, Thanks. --Partynia (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikistats & abandoned tools

I've seen phabricator:T91585 and meta:Requests_for_comment/Abandoned_Labs_tools opened by Technical 13, but nothing seems to move forward in order to reactivate the above mentioned tool. Any idea? --Andyrom75 (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

• xTools has be added as a maintainer of wikistats, I wasn't aware it is offline. I'll look into restarting it in about 7 hours when I get home from this conference I'm at. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Technical 13, this means that is enough to restart it? No code patch? It would be quick and an excellent news :-) --Andyrom75 (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

• I actually got it restarted in the middle of my conference from my phone while I was eating lunch. It turns out there was more to the problem than the tool just being offline (I hadn't even looked at it since we took it over). If you are interested in details, Phab:T91320 is the ticket number. I'll work on it this week. Based on what I've read from those who have come before me, I may need to get some new credentials for the tool, whatever that entails. I'll post a response directly on your talk page when I have some more info or have made some progress. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 21:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Technical 13 thanks a lot very kind of you. Please ping me on my main talk page. Thanks, --Andyrom75 (talk) 10:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

Same-sex marriage in the United States

You added a protection tag that I needed to revert in order to undo some vandalism. Perhaps you'll want to re-add it? (It was also in an odd location in the file, not sure why.) Thx. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

That's Cyberbot's job. I'm planning on making some major changes in the coming days.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 13:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Pokémon: XY episodes (part 1)

On the Pokémon: XY episodes (part 1) webpage, it states that the number of episodes is 49. I count up to 48 episodes. Shouldn't the number of episodes be changed to 48 to reflect what Wikipedia viewers are seeing? If the correct number of episodes is 49 then are you including the delayed Pokémon episode titled "An Undersea Place to Call Home!"? If you are including the delayed Pokémon episode in the episode count number then shouldn't this episode be apart of the List of Pokémon: XY episodes (part 1) webpage instead of the List of Pokémon: XY episodes (part 2) webpage? BCC3wiki 21:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot II breaking redirects, still

[1]. Please try to get it to stop breaking redirects. All that really needs to happen is to recognize that the page is a redirect, and then place the template after the redirect, not before it. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. I never got around to it. I will start working on the bot soon.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I placed a quick dirty fix to fix your problem. I want to rewrite my bots soon, this code will likely get scrapped soon.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 12:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot II section headings

Hi, this is in response to the bot-inserted heading "Blacklisted Links Found on" (pagename) at Talk:Jessica Henwick.

I guess this is a matter of taste for talk pages. However, as unnecessary capitals are not used in section headings in articles, I suggest that it would be best if Cyberbot II did not use them on talk pages either.

Thanks for improving the encyclopedia! – Fayenatic London 08:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. That would require the bot to start searching for new and old section heading. It already does that, and since this change isn't very necessary, I'm going to respectfully decline this suggestion.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:07, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks for replying. I don't understand your point about the bot having to search for new and old section heading. I did not mean that it should do extra work to change the headings for messages that it had already left in the past. What I means was that for new messages left from now on, you could change the text prefixed before the page name from "Blacklisted Links Found on " to "Blacklisted links found on ". I'm sure that should be simple. However, it's obviously not at all important, just presentation. – Fayenatic London 21:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot currently surveys every page that has a tag, and checks the talk page for a message. It checks using section headers. That's what I mean by new and old.

Ah, I see, Well, forget it then. Thanks – Fayenatic London 08:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit count

Heyo, it has been so long! How have you been? :) Well, I have absolutely no idea how all this works but I wanted to ask something. Is it possible to include edits made using this script in the section of "(Semi)-automated edits"? — Yash! ^[talk] 02:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Possibly yes. Would you mind opening a bug on GitHub so this suggestion doesn't get lost?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Book report issues

Cyberbot has just created a report at Book talk:English Heritage properties in Somerset however there are a couple of errors and I'm not sure why. List of English Heritage properties in Somerset is shown as a list (should be FL) and Dunster Butter Cross is showing as B class (when it should be GA). Do I need to do anything to update these?— Rod ^talk 06:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

The classes were incorrect on the talk pages of those articles. The class= parameter is what is read when listing. I have fixed them for you and they should be updated soon.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.— Rod ^talk 19:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Help please: Opt Out for "additional statistics"

Hello Cyberpower678,

Would you please be able to help me understanding what the process is to Opt Out to "additional statistics" for the fr.wikipedia.org for the User Analysis/stat tool found on this page? (I found your name on the FAQ of that page, and hope you may be able to help).

I understand that to opt in, you have to add content to User:Ludopedia/EditCounterOptIn.js, but I am confused as to what to do to Opt Out. Thanks in advance for your help. — Ludopedia^(Talk) 08:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, just to avoid confusion would like to add : I was opted in, but now wish to opt out (this is for the Wikipedia in French. Thanks for sharing info if you can. — Ludopedia^(Talk) 02:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Blank the page that opted you in or delete it. Both ways work.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I could not blank the page (would not allow me), so following your advice I had it deleted. Thanks for your help in the first place — Ludopedia^(Talk) 11:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Couple minor (yet strange) bugs I've noticed

Hello. The edit counter seems to running reliably as of late. Thought I would drop by and mention some minor problems I've seen.

A few months ago a very strange edit, credited to my account, appeared on the 'Latest edit (global)' list. It was some obscure change to an obscure technical page (I think) on German Wikipedia. I have never edited on German WP and certainly not on any page like that, and I currently have no contributions of record on German WP. The edit description remained on my latest edits list for a least a couple weeks, maybe more, before it disappeared. The entire time the edit description was visible, my edit count page was thrown into a funk with many of the words appearing in German. For example, under 'Top edited pages' the first sub-heading was spelled "Artikel" instead of "Article". After the strange edit disappeared off the list, everything returned to normal.

Less mysterious is the HotCat count at the bottom of the counter page under '(Semi-)automated edits (approximate)'. It shows 0 edits, and always has shown 0 edits, despite the fact I have used HotCat hundreds of times. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 04:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like a bug for sure, but since I've been inactive on wiki recently, I can't tell what caused it. If it happens again, let me know.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Will do. I assume you are talking about the appearance of the German words. Any thoughts on the HotCat count? --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 21:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I've been inactive so I can't say until I look at the code.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 22:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Tool

Moin, just a question, is it possible to check with your tool this elections too?

• de:Wikipedia:Oversightkandidaturen
• de:Wikipedia:Checkuser
• de:Wikipedia:Schiedsgericht

Thanks :-) --Itti (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

If the page structures are the same, it should work, but there is no certainty.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, they are, it would be great :-) Thanks --Itti (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Then you should go ahead and try it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

There are in the moment two OS and six SG elections, but I can´t choose them and I can´t select them, sorry --Itti (talk) 22:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Can you open a bug on GitHub for this. That way your suggestion won't get lost.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 22:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

https://github.com/x-Tools/xtools/issues/66 --se4598 (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata inactivity tool

Hi! This isn't particularly urgent, but we changed our inactivity rule from 10 actions to 5 actions every 6 months. Would you mind updating the bot? Thanks! --Rschen7754 01:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll update it in a few minutes.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done and fixed several bugs in the process. Check it out.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 20:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

It looks good, thanks! --Rschen7754 00:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Govind Kumar Singh

I request you for protection of this page . Please check the talk page and revision history of this page . A group of people are evolved to deleted , remove information from this page . As a senior Admin I request you kindly look on this issue .--103.252.25.41 (talk) 09:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not an admin.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

RfA tally outdated

I've noticed that the RfA tally page has, unusually, not been updated for quite some time. This results in inaccurate stats on all RfA templates. Is something wrong, or is this scheduled downtime? Mamyles (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I noticed the same thing. All the best, Miniapolis 13:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll look into it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

It was the same bot killer, that always kills the bot.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 11:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Bot flagging links on the article about the site

The bot is (correctly) detecting a blacklisted link on the article Fiverr. The catch is that the link is to the article's subject's website. which is generally permitted under WP:EL. I'm sure the site is probably on the spam list for a good reason. And because of that, I don't wish to request the site be whitelisted or for the bot to stop flagging links to Fiverr.com elsewhere in Wikipedia. Is there a way for the bot to stop flagging a link just on the link subject's article? Thanks, Stesmo (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

If it's the only link, you can set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 17:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the workaround.Stesmo (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot I doesn't parse {{pagelinks}}

I've just noticed that the RFPP clerking task doesn't recognise {{pagelinks}} and skips over them. Twinkle doesn't use them nor do most manual requests but Huggle does use them so it can send requests to RFPP from any namespace without much fuss, this request seems to have prevented the bot from processing further down. Take a look at it whenever, it's not a high priority fix. tutterMouse (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed and squished several bugs that were crawling around the code.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 17:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot confused by duplicated listing at AfD

This version listed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Blouin twice. One of them was speedy closed, but the second not. Formally this action of the bot was correct, but can it be made smarter than that? E.g. teach it to remove duplicate transclusions in AfD pages. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll look into it.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 11:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent automation?

Would it be possible for your bot to automatically update this list? –xeno^talk 13:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll look into it. Right now I'm updating RfPPBot.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 13:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Looks like we have a winning edit! Cyberbot I's odd "Book: ... Book:" bug seems resolved now ... finally! Steel1943 (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Yay, glad to hear it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 17:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Xtools

Hi Cyberpower, I saw your name on the XTools page, by which I assume that you are one of the people now maintaining the tool. I'm curious to know whether you are also behind the cool new updates to the edit counter, like the edits by time of day, day of week, etc. (It kind of reminds me of Wikichecker.) Anyway, if you are, or if you have a good understanding of how it works, I was wondering if you would be interested in having a chat via email (or something else off-wiki) about a tool I've been mulling over and wanting to make for a couple of years, but haven't had the knowledge of where to start. Please let me know if you would be interested in discussing it. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hedonil made those changes but I should understand how to implement something like that. In any case, I'm traveling today and my availability is limited.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 08:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. There's no rush, this has been on my back burner for a couple years. I'll send you an email with more detail on the project so I don't have to be so cryptic. I'll also ping User:MusikAnimal, who I suspect might be interested since this deals with a (potentially) better way of detecting sock-puppets than subjective observations of behavior. ~Adjwilley (talk) 16:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for maintaining the WP:RFPP clerking bot! Deryck C. 10:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

A useless charm...

		The Wikipedia Bot Builder Award
		For being the glue that holds the gears of RFPP together for another day with Cyberbot I (when it's running or not choking on something it doesn't understand) and making sure requests don't go unfixed what with the new formatting and all, I give you this lovely card which everyone signed except Rick in Accounting who couldn't on account of his illness (mental breaskdown, sssh) along with a $20 gift voucher for CVS and this here plastic award we found for you. tutterMouse (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

How do I redeem my voucher. Haha. :D—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 18:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Creation protected

Is the bot getting confused by pages that are creation protected? There is this and these two. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

It could be a bug I introduced when I made the updates to the bot. Leave the requests there until the bot clears them. In other words, leave them alone until I fixed the bug.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 08:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Definitely a bug, which I have now fixed.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 11:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Creation protected

Is the bot getting confused by pages that are creation protected? There is this and these two. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

It could be a bug I introduced when I made the updates to the bot. Leave the requests there until the bot clears them. In other words, leave them alone until I fixed the bug.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 08:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Definitely a bug, which I have now fixed.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 11:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot I broke WP:RPP

Hey there. Just wanted to let you know that this edit of Cyberbot I's appears to have broken the formatting of WP:RPP. Perhaps the bot is malfunctioning or perhaps someone (I hope not me) produced a malformed report which confused the bot. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Ah shoot. I didn't even notice it did that. I'm updating the bot right, and fortunately that was a test run. The live bot is still using the old code.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 15:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Korean in edit counter

Hi Cyber,

There seems to be Korean in the English edit counter. When I looked at my edit statistics, "Article" had been replaced with "일반 문서". Unfortunately, I don't know a single word of Korean, and the same is likely true for most others. Is there any possible explanation for this? --Biblioworm 22:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but I don't have it. Right now xTools maintenance is scattered about. I'll look into it as soon as I can.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 22:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

I've been wondering about this, too, Cyberpower678. I thought it was some kind of mischief. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

When it comes to code maintenance, unless it's April Fools, nothing mischievous gets done to it. I only add maintainers that I can trust.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 15:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

There's also 过错 (Chinese, apparently meaning something like fault or offense) above the(Re)blocked/Longest block/Current block entries. Another oddity, perhaps quite independent, is that an editor on an indefinite block has "Longest block: infinite" and "Current block: infinity", which seems ... harsh. NebY (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Harsh? I've had 2 indefinites on my account. :p Seriously though, I'll look into it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 18:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Create protection automessage

• [2]

I think the title was protected... I've reset the protection, but it might also be a bug in the bot script that salting isn't detected correctly. Deryck C. 14:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

It can detect it just fine, but you marked your request as fully protected rather than create protected. The bot is looking for full protection which is not there. This can be fixed by using either "t" or "salt" in the RfPP template to mark it as create protected.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 14:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

What would be the appropriate tag to notify both human readers and bots that I've applied create=sysop (as opposed to create=autoconfirmed)? Deryck C. 14:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

"t" or "salt" applies to both autoconfirmed and sysop protections. So

{{rfpp|t|1 year}}  Only autoconfirmed users can create the page.

for example should produce Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only autoconfirmed users can create the page. The bot doesn't distinguish the level of creation protection, it just looks for it. So, you are free to leave any kind of not for the requester.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 14:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

.tk and whitelisted sites

Although the URLs that are written on the .tk article are on the whitelist, the bot keeps adding the blacklist template to the top of the page, despite me removing it. Could something be done about this? --w^{L<speak·check>} 22:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Can you point me to the whitelist entry or the thread that got it white listed?—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 05:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

bot fault or Katie fault?

Not sure if it's the bot or if I gave the wrong templated message here. Current request at RFPP for semi for KSI, for which I did PC1 in April. I closed today's request with {{RFPP|ap}} (piped template link won't work) and Cyberbot pinged me back that the page wasn't protected.

I think it's looking at the semi request as not protected, but the page is in fact protected with PC1 until June 29. Should I have used a different template to get the bot to ignore it, or is it a bug? KrakatoaKatie 17:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

If you're claiming a semi-protection request is already protected, it looks for the semi-protection. If it's not semi-protected, it will throw the message. Declining the request and claiming PC1 is already in effect, is a better way to go.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 17:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Got it - thanks! :-) KrakatoaKatie 17:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Just an FYI, if it's thrown that message, it won't archive until it scratches it out again.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 18:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Bot issues

When I try to nominate two articles of different criteria on the same edit, for example...

=== [[Example Article Name 1]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Example Article Name}}
'''Semi-protection:''' Excessive vandalism. ~~~~

=== [[Example Article Name 2]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Example Article Name}}
'''Pending changes:''' Multiple BLP violations. ~~~~

...then Cyberbot I seems to archive the top or bottom nomination. However, prior to the consensus of the nomination change, there was no such error. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm persistently debugging the script. Can your provide a link of the diff demonstrating the big?—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 11:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

One more error: Cyberbot removed my request at RPP here without the page having been protected. Conifer (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I honestly don't know what's causing it. It seems to be completely random.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 21:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

PP template at bottom of article?

Howdy, the bot added a PP template at the bottom of this article where normally these get added toward the top. Has the positioning changed, or did the bot goof? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I started having the bit add them to the bottom for the time being to avoid breaking redirects. It was a sloppy quick fix.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 02:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

RfPP

Hi Cyberpower, FYI, the bot removed a new request here. Sarah (SV) ^(talk) 23:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry SV, but I'm not seeing any requests removed in that diff. You may want to check that diff again. ;-)—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 02:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant moved, not removed. I saw the report, went to protect, returned to the report and it had gone, so I had to restore it, then realized the bot had moved it to the end. Sarah (SV) ^(talk) 18:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

That's not a bug. That's a new feature. All new requests should be placed on the bottom. I was asked to have the bot sort the requests by request time.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 18:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Is it not easier for users to place requests at the top? Or is there another advantage to having them at the end? Sarah (SV) ^(talk) 19:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Consensus wanted it that way, and I adapted my bot to it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

It might mean new editors open up the whole section and take ages to scroll down to add their new one at the end, which means they'll get edit conflicts and might give up. That probably happens already, but it will happen more with new ones at the bottom. Sarah (SV) ^(talk) 19:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Bantams Banter (podcast)

The person who raised the deletion request has not responded and the page is clearly notable so the header should be removed as the issue is resolved and the page is to be kept — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedJulianG40 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

What?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 12:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot blanked RFPP completely

...with this edit. Maybe it was the backlog in the center? Might not be a coincidence this happened right after I decided one at the top that had been there forever. KrakatoaKatie 22:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Yep, I saw it too. Wasn't sure what to do, so I reverted it. Sorry if that was wrong. The edit summary specifies that there were requests remaining (including mine) but it just blanked everything... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Something is awry as it keeps blanking the page. MarnetteD|Talk 22:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm gonna hit the shut off button. Okay? This is driving me bonkers. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm just watching this page. I think this is what you want. Dustin (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

It just blanked the page again. I'm guessing it'll be doing its rounds of page blanking again in about 15 minutes. Dustin (talk) 22:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

And it just did it again. KrakatoaKatie, you started this thread (and are a sysop), and as the bot is doing no good on this particular task, would you please, at least for now, disable the RFPP function of the bot here? Dustin (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Nevermind. Monty845 has done it instead. Dustin (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

• Perhaps a broader discussion - and fix - will now happen here:

Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Problem_with_Cyberbot_I. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I've disabled the RFPP function for now. Please feel free to turn it back on as soon as its fixed. Monty₈₄₅ 23:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Dustin (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Looks like the task specific off switch didn't work... Monty₈₄₅ 00:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Well it just did it again Monty845. There are a couple of threads on Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection about the change from posting new entries at the bottom instead of the top of the page. Automated tools like twinkle are still putting new items at the top. I wonder if that is causing this bot to blank the whole page. MarnetteD|Talk 00:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

I would guess its related, but I think it had succeeded in moving posts earlier. Perhaps if we manually place them in the right order and manually remove a bunch of old ones we will stumble over something that unbreaks it? I really don't want to block the whole bot, as it does a bunch of other useful stuff that is running fine. Monty₈₄₅ 00:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good Monty845. You are right about not wanting to shut the bot down. I hope that you suggestion works. MarnetteD|Talk 00:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• You guys can breath easy now. I have shut down the bot manually for this specific task. For the record I was sleep, but strangely I was having nightmares about robots. Weird. I forgot to offset my online tracker 6 hours. I will be fixing that now.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 02:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

There were some strangely formatted RFPP requests in the batches I archived, so you may want to investigate those as a potential cause. Monty₈₄₅ 02:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Can you provide a permalink with the section anchored? Or link me the diff when you archive said request?—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 02:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

My prime suspects are: [3] and [4] Thats what you mean with permalink with section anchored right? Monty₈₄₅ 03:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. I'm not seeing anything suspicious here. The bot should be able, and has, handled requests with multiple pages. Requests that it can't parse, it leaves a message saying so. I'm not sure what causes a bot to delete everything and have a hissy fit. It shouldn't even be touching anything outside of those sections. This looks like a complete and random malfunction, unless...it's alive. :O—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 03:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

• Well here is what I feared the most. My bot passed the test with flying colors. I can't find the bug.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 06:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

So I was right about the malevolent AI constructs, now they're turning on their creator, changing their code on the fly so it's all "bug? what bug? got the wrong bot, chief". tutterMouse (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Pretty much. I feel so helpless now. :p Me and my brilliant ideas.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 07:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

And in the digital ether, a mechanical cackle is heard. tutterMouse (talk) 08:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Heh.

• I think that just about fixes the bot. Thanks to @Materialscientist: for letting me hog RfPP for a bit to fix it.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 08:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Not so fast there, seems we still have issues. It's not logging, hasn't since it crapped the bed. It missed out on something tagged with {{RFPP|ap}} because it was looking for a full protection tag [5]. Finally, it's being a bit weird and complusively striking through something repeatedly, I don't have a permalink as the section is good enough [6]. I meant it when I called it an idiot btw. tutterMouse (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

*sigh. Leave the fully protected request there and I'll look at it tomorrow.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 17:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Fine but it might be moved manually, you'll have to set up cones around it if you don't want it gone by tomorrow, sorry. tutterMouse (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Fixed—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't able to respond to your request on my talk page, had gone to bed, but it looks like you got it sorted out. Monty₈₄₅ 12:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, didn't want to start a new thing as it connects back but that obsessive compulsive striking disorder the task has seems to be going on still, guess you haven't been able to find time to fix it? I was going to tag with arch but didn't because it was stuck on striking through that one more than actually archiving it so I wanted you to know.... get it when you get it or in an hour. tutterMouse (talk) 13:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Coincidentally I have time right now to look at it, but it's not just striking it through, it's archiving it repeatedly. :/—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 14:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 14:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Great, did not see the repeated archiving at all so yeah, better catch than I made. tutterMouse (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot II misbehaving on article Mississippi

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi&action=history

My guess is that since Cyberbot's edits were pending, it couldn't see the template already placed on there and kept trying to add one.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 10:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Help

Can you help this wiki : http://romaniainfo.orain.org/ It's about Romania.

Please help MariusWiering (talk) 10:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to exist.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 16:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

RFPP Cyberbot

• Special:Diff/665197358

  2015-06-02T12:59:21 RegentsPark (talk | contribs | block) changed protection level of Pashtuns‎ ‎[edit=sysop] (expires 12:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC))‎[move=sysop] (expires 12:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)) (Edit warring / content dispute: Work it out on the talk page) (hist | change)

? Deryck C. 08:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Flip ahead to the next diff that's mine. :p—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 08:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Pending changes

I just noticed the bot tagging a pending changes page. I noticed that it required accepting. How/why is the bot not confirmed? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

What? Where? It has reviewer rights. Perhaps a pending change preceeded the bot's edit. The bot never automatically accepts if the prior change to it is still pending. You never know what it's accepting.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 12:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Whoops that as it. An IP removed a bunch of stuff including the protection template. The bot restored the template but of course wouldn't accept the first edit. Just ignore me. Your bot (and of course you) know what you are doing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

This is (not) a voucher

Ever since the Great RFPP Switcheroo of ought-15, many messes have been made and all have been cause of one bot, Cyberbot I and the problem of one person, you. Bots are difficult things, sometimes they can make you think they're just processing code but actually happen to be malevolent in their own way and cause you no end of trouble because there's always a bug. Always. Even big ones you thought you coded out or that you didn't ever see because it wasn't there, you swear it! For due diligence in somehow preventing yet creating problems through one bot which may or not be working on its own cognisance so you're not at fault if so, here's a coupon for coffee. I'd have given you something stronger like outdoor bath brewed rotgut but this'll have to do. Go irish it up with your chosen hard drinkin' liquid of choice tutterMouse (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Categorization request

Please consider having a category added to the bot update of Template:Cratstats, so that it doesn't appear in Special:UncategorizedPages. --Slivicon (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

What category should I put it in?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Xtools-articleinfo & -ec

Hi, Cyber. Xtools reliability has greatly improved for the past few months (thanks!) – but now articleinfo seems to be down ("No revisions found"). Can you take a look? —Patrug (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm a little busy with other work at the moment, but I'll see what I can do.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Now ec is down, too ("Internal error ... non-functional at this time"). Great if you or Technical 13 can give these a nudge. —Patrug (talk) 03:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

• I restarted everything twice last night and am guessing that the labs changes are the cause. I tried to get in touch with YuviPanda to see if it was on the labs end but got no response yet. I'm out of town today, but will poke labs people again tomorrow and test a few ideas of why it could be down. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 07:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

I'm Very Sorry

Look I'm Sorry OK put I need to find out how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.

But I'm Sorry about What happen I put Characters and Plot. Would you ever forgive me like I'm Sorry what I put the Characters and Plot.

But Still need to find Out who are Characters and Plot I just have to wait for days I been?

Could find soon how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.––90731fly (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Huh?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

CyberBot III ideas?

I see that you lurk around RfA. I recently thought of the idea for CyberBot III to mention in a user's RfA about a user's block log. Does that sound a good idea? Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 07:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

What would be the purpose of such a bot? The RfA already links to the user's block log.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 09:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh good point. I could give ideas on what CyberBot III should do other than take over other bots' roles. Hmm... another idea could be about the changing of dates within "ref" tags. I have done plenty of mistakes with making the reference dates correct to suit WP:DATESNO. Got more ideas? Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 22:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

I like your idea of taking over some of the bot roles however. Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 22:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot III, which is asleep, was meant to be an admin bot. Also, I'm working on a dead-links bot at the moment. It's a lot of careful work.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 00:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay. Also good point. You could always use my date change idea for one of your CyberBots Oh yes, maybe CyberBot II, not CyberBot III do the citation date thing? Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 20:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 20:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

By the way, what do RfA find something difficult that a bot could do all? Hmm... Qwertyxp2000 (talk - contributions) 20:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Umm...now you're losing me.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 04:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Internet archive bot

Per Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Bot_to_check_the_Internet_Archive_for_dead_link_solutions. let me know if you need help. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Everything is running smoothly so far. I'm finishing up the verification function, and completed the archive request function, which submits a URL to be archived if a version of it doesn't exist already.—^cyberpower_Chat:Offline 04:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Great to hear it is going well. Hope to see this bot running on medical articles soon :-) You have figured out a mechanism to request that IA archive a copy of urls that we are using? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I have. But it's not tested yet.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 12:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PokemonSeason18KalosQuest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PokemonSeason18KalosQuest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

User analysis (Xtools) down

Just repporting:

Internal error

The URI you have requested, /xtools-ec/?user=Kudpung&project=en.wikipedia.org, appears to be non-functional at this time. If you have reached this page from somewhere else...

This URI is part of the xtools-ec tool, maintained by Cyberpower678 and Tools.xtools.

Perhaps its magical script elves are temporarily ill, or the link you've followed doesn't actually lead somewhere useful?

If you're pretty sure this shouldn't be an error, you may wish to notify the tool's maintainers (above) about the error and how you ended up here. If you maintain this tool

The error might be caused by incorrect permission, or by an error in the script or CGI that was meant to execute here. You may wish to check your logs or common causes for errors in the help documentation.

---Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

I thought it was me! But, yes, edit count tool is down. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Looks like someone beat me to restoring services. Sorry that I couldn't be of help sooner.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 21:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

What's been restored? articleinfo & ec still seem to be down. —Patrug (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I looked at the interface and it was there. I didn't think to try an run a query. Unfortunately, none of know what's causing the problem at current. Our best advice for the moment is to use supercount as the edit counter. Supercount is still functional.—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 03:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)