User talk:Cuprum17/Archive2021
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
USCGC Tampa (1912)
[edit]Hello Cuprum17,
could you please explain me what "1930" means in this sentence?
"At 1930 that evening, as she transited the Bristol Channel, the warship was spotted by UB-91."
As it can’t be the year (as the ship was engulfed on September 26th, 1918), I thought it was the time of day, hence I added an h, which you removed: "19h30". I’m a little bit confused.
Best regards from Berlin, Herwarth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herwarth (talk • contribs) 22:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Herwarth: 1930 in this sentence is the 24-hour clock time for 7:30 PM. The American military time convention uses no colon between the hour and the minute, as in the first edit you made (i.e. 19:30) nor does it use an "h" (i.e. 19h30). The 24-hour clock is used militarily to avoid confusing 7:30 PM with 7:30 AM and in many military history narratives where certain events are told in sequence the convention is carried over in the narrative. Occasionally some authors in describing a military event or series of events will use a variation in the 24-hour military clock style that uses the style "1930 hours". I hope this helps and greetings from the state of Kansas in the United States! Cuprum17 (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Service main image discussion - Coast Guard in particular
[edit]Hey, I was wondering if you'd be interested in providing any input at Talk:United States Space Force#Lead image, specifically about the Coast Guard lead image since it looks like the discussion may expand to that (and I know it's one of your primary topics). Thanks!Garuda28 (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USCGC Richard Dixon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yola.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
[edit]Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Operation Stable Door
[edit]Hi I've just created Operation Stable Door, if you're inclined to review it that would be very useful. best regards Mztourist (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Mztourist: I looked at the article and everything looks good for a B-class article except that there are a couple of paragraphs missing citations. Fix that and I'll be happy to assess it as a B-class article. Thanks for your contribution to the understanding of the Vietnam War operations. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Cuprum, I've added one ref but details are lacking for the replacement of a couple of teams, the available reports just refer to the MIUWS 23 at Qui Nhon and then later reports refer to IUWU-3 and the same for MIUWS 22 at Nha Trang then refer to IUWU-4. Mztourist (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Mztourist: The Cutler reference I put in the article kind of covers the replacement problem by flat stating that there were five IUWU units in country in early 1968. Hope that helps...however, now that I have contributed to the article I don't feel that I should change the class of the article to "B", even though the referencing question is solved. Suggestions? Cuprum17 (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I don't have a copy of Cutler, so that's good to have. I also just created a page for the Strike Assault Boat about which there's very little information, does Cutler say anything about them? Regarding the page assessment, can just wait for a bot or reviewer to assess it. regards Mztourist (talk) 02:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Cutler does not mention the Strike Assault Boat or STABRON 20. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks anyway, seems there's very little written about them and I've probably exhausted the sources. regards Mztourist (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Cutler does not mention the Strike Assault Boat or STABRON 20. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I don't have a copy of Cutler, so that's good to have. I also just created a page for the Strike Assault Boat about which there's very little information, does Cutler say anything about them? Regarding the page assessment, can just wait for a bot or reviewer to assess it. regards Mztourist (talk) 02:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Mztourist: The Cutler reference I put in the article kind of covers the replacement problem by flat stating that there were five IUWU units in country in early 1968. Hope that helps...however, now that I have contributed to the article I don't feel that I should change the class of the article to "B", even though the referencing question is solved. Suggestions? Cuprum17 (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Cuprum, I've added one ref but details are lacking for the replacement of a couple of teams, the available reports just refer to the MIUWS 23 at Qui Nhon and then later reports refer to IUWU-3 and the same for MIUWS 22 at Nha Trang then refer to IUWU-4. Mztourist (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Cuprum, I've just created Light SEAL Support Craft and was wondering if Cutler mentions it? regards Mztourist (talk) 05:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- I checked the Cutler source and he doesn't mention the Light SEAL Support Craft. I am checking a couple of other sources but I don't think they will be of much help. Stay tuned... Cuprum17 (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated, they really seem to be little known vessels. To complicate things further it seems that in 1967 the SEALs used a boat called the Seal Team Assault Boat, which abbreviated to STAB - the same acronym used for the 1970 Strike Assault Boat. There was also a Medium SEAL Support Craft, but again there's very little available information. Mztourist (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mztourist:No joy on my other sources. Sorry. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cuprum, thanks anyway, that's the problem with trying to write about little-known vessels I guess. best regards Mztourist (talk) 04:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mztourist:No joy on my other sources. Sorry. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated, they really seem to be little known vessels. To complicate things further it seems that in 1967 the SEALs used a boat called the Seal Team Assault Boat, which abbreviated to STAB - the same acronym used for the 1970 Strike Assault Boat. There was also a Medium SEAL Support Craft, but again there's very little available information. Mztourist (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Greetings!
[edit]@Cuprum17: I hope this finds you and your family well. I've been mamaging to beat the odds every day and so far so good. Best wishes!
Pendright (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Pendright: Hey! Good to hear from you. I hadn't seen much activity on your talk page (one of the few that I follow) and figured you must be staying out of trouble; at least as far as Wikipedia is concerned. I have started and stopped writing several small articles in the last few months. Somehow I just can't quite get them massaged into a final form. My edits have mostly been corrections of other peoples mistakes. I have a tendency to be able to see others mistakes in material but not my own! My machine shop hobby has taken up quite a bit of my time lately, probably too much if the truth be known. I miss being in my job shop when I was in business, but thankful I don't have to put in the hours to pay the bills. I'm getting out more now that I have received my two COVID shots and the threat of passing something along to friends and family are reduced. I hope you are staying healthy, my Wiki-friend and thanks for the shout-out! Cuprum17 (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Cuprum17: Great to hear from you! I’m all vaccinated-up and staying well, thankfully! I have a few articles I think might be worthy of FAC, and I plan to nominate them by the end of the summer. Although I have not ben too active on Wikipedia, I have been reviewing AC article nominations for the past two years. Not all of them have been success stories, but some have been well received. In any event, it has been a positive experience for me, and I have seen improvement in my own writing and have a better appreciation and understanding of the rules of grammar. Give it a try; my guess is you would be good at it. I like the interaction with others, and I think you might too. Thanks for keeping in touch, and enjoy the summer.
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
"Bernie Webber" reverted
[edit]You have reverted my one-word edit to "The Finest Hours". In the "Plot" section it starts "Bernard 'Bernie" Webber", but after that it's all "Bernie", "Bernie", "Bernie". Then suddenly only FOUR WORDS after the last reference to "Bernie", it's "Webber and his crew". Not everyone reading WP has an IQ as high as yours. For people who have the short-term memory of a goldfish, (there are such people and it's not a convenient life), is it too much to ask that this last reference to "Bernie" should be as "Bernie Webber"? 202.142.52.94 (talk) 11:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I object to the tone of your post on MY TALK PAGE. I find it insulting. Do not post here again, please. Cuprum17 (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- You are being over-sensitive. There is no "MY TALK PAGE". User talk pages, like all other WP pages, are for the development of the encyclopedia. That is what I was doing. Yes, my tone was rather sharp, but I believe I also have reason to be offended by your simple reversion of what I consider to be a reasonable change. Would you prefer it if I had put my "offensive tone" in public on the article Talk page? I am discussing it here in private. WP editors are supposed to resolve matters by reasonable discussion. I believe my original post made a reasonable point and asked a reasonable question (if you disregard the tone. I have said why I did that, let it be quits at that). Do you consider it unreasonable that after so many references to "Bernie", the last reference should be to "Bernie Webber" rather than just "Webber"? 202.142.52.94 (talk) 12:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I asked you not to post here nicely once, and I will ask again. Please do not post on MY TALK PAGE again; it is MY TALK PAGE because I control what is posted here. I can delete this whole conversation on a whim, if I wish. You do what you want on the "The Finest Hours" article. I am done. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- You are being over-sensitive. There is no "MY TALK PAGE". User talk pages, like all other WP pages, are for the development of the encyclopedia. That is what I was doing. Yes, my tone was rather sharp, but I believe I also have reason to be offended by your simple reversion of what I consider to be a reasonable change. Would you prefer it if I had put my "offensive tone" in public on the article Talk page? I am discussing it here in private. WP editors are supposed to resolve matters by reasonable discussion. I believe my original post made a reasonable point and asked a reasonable question (if you disregard the tone. I have said why I did that, let it be quits at that). Do you consider it unreasonable that after so many references to "Bernie", the last reference should be to "Bernie Webber" rather than just "Webber"? 202.142.52.94 (talk) 12:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
J. William Kime Article
[edit]I noticed the "thank you" note from you regarding my recent edit to the article I previously created on former U.S. Coast Guard Commandant J. William Kime. I went ahead and removed the stub tag from the article and submitted a request for WikiProject Maryland to reassess the article's current Stub assessment from them, although I am not sure what kind of response I will receive because WikiProject Maryland is currently listed as semi-active. Any further assistance you can provide with regard to that article would be most appreciated.--TommyBoy (talk) 23:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia
[edit]I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research. If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)