Right Between the Eyes

I've declined your speedy as it's not covered by A7. It's an album, and the band does have an article, so that's another CSD cat out of the window. However... It does say 'copyright Atlantic Records' at the end, so it's probably a copyvio, and may not be notable in itself anyway. I'd advise prod for notability, with a rider of suspected copyvio - and see if you can find the thing in the meantime... Peridon (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indophobia

Please could you block the ip 14 he has reverted 3 times now...Ruffruder0 (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator. Cst17 (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:AIV. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I give up this vandal definitely has some experience I added two more sources which pinpoint anti Indian sentiment yet he still comes out with some crappy excuses Ruffruder0 (talk) 08:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to South Western

	Edits to South Western
	I work in this School District. There was currently a bond issue, witch was a plan to rebuild all elementary schools and Franklin Heights High School. I assure you that I know what i'm doing. The bond issue passed so schools will be rebuilt. PrestonLong (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot

I can see why you have such a shit sheet. One million Australians laugh at you. Get your facts right before you vandalise pages and revert edits.

Talkback

Hello, Cst17. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added 10:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

re: your erroneous claim Theopolisme _TALK 10:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...

Why did you restore copyvio content with this edit? Singularity42 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the request for deletion, otherwise the page cannot be deleted (and the page is deleted now).Cst17 (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not that it matters now, but the only substantial editor blanked the page, removing the copyrighted content. A bot then automatically tagged the article for deletion under G7, which is a pefectly valid reason for deletion after all of the copyvio content was removed (which was the entirety of the article). Once tagged for G7, there was no reason to restore to the earlier version that contained the G12 deletion tag - and therefore, the copyvio material...

Anyway, it's not a big deal, but it just seemed odd. Singularity42 (talk) 14:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archive?

Have you ever though about archiving your talk page? Dan653 (talk) 00:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought about it, will do it this week. Cst17 (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And done. :-) Cst17 (talk) 06:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions, Cst17. SwisterTwister talk 02:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Rina Lorilla

Hello Cst17. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rina Lorilla, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

196.44.146.4

196.44.146.4 (talk · contribs) is either a very confused newbie or a tr@ll. :-( - 220 of ^Borg 13:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what he/she is doing, but my main guess would be a newbie. But he/she is ignoring all the warnings, that also could guide him/her. Cst17 (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh! They would seem to understand English. Just have to keep reverting, or get them blocked (temporarily), I suppose! :-/ - 220 of ^Borg 13:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a report to wp:AIV. Maybe a 24 hour block(?) will get them talking. I AGF but I've been chasing them around for over 1 ½ hours! - 220 of ^Borg 13:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that would be the best. We can't keep following him. Cst17 (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Truman Doctrine

Do you monitor this article? What's going on with the "Truman islandsn" that appears throughout? Thanks for checking.Pkeets (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't monitor the article, I just patrol recent changes for vandalism. Cst17 (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might be vandalism. It doesn't make sense. Pkeets (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the rule being applied hard & fast?

Hi Cst17, 'http://www.frenchriverland.com/byron_mccoy.htm' is an informative history of Francis Turbines (with excellent illustrations) and doesn't advertise 'frenchriverland.com'. Is the rule being applied hard & fast? How can one get around it? Thanks, TBond (talk) 07:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your last two edits were adding the same link in different articles, which made it look like spamming. Otherwise propose the link on the talk page of the article.Cst17 (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can't get around the rules. Sorry. AndrewN ^talk 08:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advice. TBond (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Mcgee

You reverted an article blanking on Robin Mcgee but the blanking editor was also the creator. As it was already a BLP of concern and a PROD I believe it should be allowed to die so I have speedied it with a G7. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the blanking so that the G7 came back.Cst17 (talk) 19:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bagittoday

This is a fraud company please delete its page on wikipedia after verification. Akardeepak (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tiwest Joint Venture

Cst17 Please delete this page. There is no more Tiwest Joint Venture. This page was intentionally edited. To look at the Merger please refer to

Tronox

Thanks JCockrum Tronox — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCockrum (talk • contribs) 14:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oor die foro...

Nou het ek jou verstaan. Ag, nie man.. A friend of mine made a comment that there are no images on Wikipedia illustrating contemporary architecture in Pretoria, so I decided to make some of modern images in Pretoria East. The image is intended to serve the same function as this photo (it is not mentioned in the text, but is included in four articles. Jammer vir die misverstand. Regards --PretoriaTravel (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for all your great work in reverting vandalism. Edwardx (talk) 13:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Aztlan.

The lines edited in Aztlan, which were deleted were unproven opinions, and the "sources" were all opinions, based on the sources agenda, none of it was based on facts. The matter needs to be removed from the dicussion of Aztlan, because it is not fact. The fact is, the land being referred to in the popular usage of the word "Aztlan" (by activists, here in the USA, primarily), has nothing to do with the Aztec, and the maps used to illustrate "Aztlan" are not maps of any place called "Aztlan", nor are they maps of any Aztec tribe. The Aztec did not even call themselves "Aztec", the Spanish called them that. The Aztec tribe did not draw maps, the Aztec tribe did not populate any vast area in what is now the USA. The Aztec empire existed down in what is now southeast Mexico, and had nothing at all to do with the tribes which are indigenous to the Southwest and western USA. Hundreds of Native American tribes populated the Southwest and West (USA) and none of them were Aztec. The Ute were not "Aztec", if they had been they would not call themselves "Ute" today, and Utah would be called "Mexicah", it is not, because the Ute are not Aztec/Mexica. These fairy tales being posted as "fact" based on someones opinion need to be removed. Just because someone once thought the Mexica/Aztec originated somewhere does not make it worthy of being posted as a fact, when it is just opinion. Also it needs to be pointed out that the tribes that lived in what is now the US southwest were not "Aztec", and their homelands were not "Aztec" land. Also that the maps used to promote this nonsense are Spanish maps not "Aztec" maps, illustrating Spanish land claims (not necessarily explorations), and the Spanish were certainly not claiming the lands for a tribe way down in Mexico that they tried to wipe off the face of the earth. Using Spanish maps of the land they stole from the Native American tribes, to illustrate a made up fiction, intending to lay claim to that land under the name of a tribe that did not live here, is ludicrous, and it needs to be made clear. There is no map of "Aztlan", because nobody even knows where it was supposed to be. I removed fiction and opinion, they have no place masquerading as "fact" here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CheyenneZ (talk • contribs) 16:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gunter Guillame

is dead dead dead, and therefore the biographies of living persons policy does not apply to him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.19.66 (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

=Thank You

Thanks for telling me about the sandbox and i am sorry for vandalisingTankman98 (talk) 10:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Sampras

Sampras's first name isn't Peter. Do some research, it's Petros. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.205.90 (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sankaralingam Jagannathan

Sankaralingam Jagannathan was a veteran Gandhian activist who passed away recently. The article on his name redirect the users to the wiki page of Krishnammal Jagannathan, his wife. I deleted the article wih Sankaralingam's name to make space for new article by his name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by எஸ்ஸார் (talk • contribs) 15:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You blanked the page. Cst17 (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashmirbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kashmirbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Mudasirahanger (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

we are the kashmir first ecommerce portal selling huge kashmiri products

First of all you shouldn't remove a speedy deletion nomination from a page you created. Let other judge that. Secondly the word "we" means that you are promoting your own portal. Cst17 (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]