User talk:TBond

Welcome!

Hello, TBond, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Francis turbine with this edit does not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2017Jl30: Are Gaussian units obsolete or deprecated?

An edit using the word 'obsolete' in Lorenz gauge condition's Description was undone by YohanN7

(see en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lorenz_gauge_condition&action=history)

TBond believes that it's important to explain to the reader why there are side-by-side two almost identical equations. Do we want the reader to think that Physics is nonsense? Would using the word 'deprecated' be acceptable?

2017Au24: Addition to Deus vult reverted by Chris_troutman

Hi Chris,

(This is my first entry in someone's User_talk page :-) )

Believe your reversion yesterday of the following addition to Deus vult was a bit strict/restrictive:

Deus le volt is the version used by Frankish Crusaders in Russell Hoban's novel Pilgermann.

My reasons for the addition:

-Hoban is a scholarly & important author and the novel includes a bibliography. I trust that his spelling is historicly accurate.

-Yet another version/spelling of 'Deus vult' reflects the evolution of western european languages (eg: french & german) occuring during the medieval period.

-Pilgermann is an excellent novel that revolves around the religious arrogance (and the resulting hatred/bloodshed) that the phrase 'Deus vult' expresses. Maybe readers of this article would be intrigued to read it.

Hoping you change your mind.

Thanks TBond (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunfight at the O.K. Corral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frontier Marshal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The DPL bot seems to have corrected the error. TBond (talk) 00:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]