User talk:Mudasirahanger

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashmirbox

Hello Mudasirahanger,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kashmirbox for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 09:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 10:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Kashmirbox. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using this account to evade a block on another account, and for using Wikipeida only for promotion or advertising. Either of these would have alone been sufficient reason for the block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kashmirbox screen.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kashmirbox screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mudasirahanger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

deleted page Kashmirbox (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: A7: Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) why are you then allowing others like flipkart and others we are the first kashmir based company you can check our ref also Mudasirahanger (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No coherent reason given to unblock. You are required to address the block reasons, which are block evasion and advertising. Other editors' behaviour cannot form any part of any future unblock requests.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Italic textMudasirahanger (talk) 14:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC) unblock me user:jamesBWatson[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mudasirahanger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have created article kashmirbox which you people believe is promotion but not we are the first kashmir india eCommerce company operating from srinagar why are blocking me if you people think it is an promotion you can check the ref of that article or here on more link we have been award as hottest eCommerce in india --‎Kashmir Box being awarded as the hottest startup in India(people's choice) by Vice President flipkart.com, Mr Saran Chatterji. ---[| yourstory.in] kindly unblock my article also

Decline reason:

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that you are not willing to follow the conflict of interest guidelines, and that, if unblocked, you would go back to using Wikipedia to write about your own organization. You also state that you are not able to recognize the promotional tone of what you have already written. This request seems to make a clear statement of the reasons that this account should remain blocked - there is no reason for unblocking in this request. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You wrote "unblock me user:jamesBWatson", but in fact I will not assess your unblock request, as I am the administrator who blocked you, so I will leave it for another administrator to asses, so that you get an independent opinion. However, it may perhaps help you if I point out a couple of aspects of your unblock request which make it very unlikely that it will be accepted. You can write a whole page full of such marketing-speak as "We are a social business platform that is committed to bring a vibrant economic activity to the community and unlock the potential of all stakeholders" and claim it is not promotion? If you sincerely do not think that is promotion, then you are very unlikely to be able to be able to write in the neutral, objective way that is required for a Wikipedia article. Also, you have not addressed the issue of block evasion. Finally, it is very unlikely that you will be unblocked in order to write about your own company. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral, independent, point of view, and Wikipedia does not exist as a free service for businesses to post their own preferred accounts of themselves. If, however, you wish to contribute content to the encyclopaedia on subjects other than your business, so that you have no conflict of interest, then address the issue of block evasion, indicate what type of contributions you would like to offer, and make an unblock request. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, i prefer not to make a determination where I have previously commented, but to (hopefully) guide you I will point out that any future unblock request must address the reasons for your block. Arguing about your article, which is blatantly promotional, is not the way to get unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If your organization is indeed notable, then it is inevitable that someone outside the organization will write about it. It would be possible to unblock this account if you were going to be making the encyclopedia better, and not writing about your own business. Are you interested in volunteering to help write an encyclopedia? It can be an interesting and rewarding hobby. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]