User talk:Crimson ClawYT

Welcome!

Hello, Crimson ClawYT, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Giant Snowman 15:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Proposed deletion of Susan MacDonald

The article Susan MacDonald has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 00:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Susan MacDonald moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Susan MacDonald, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 00:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Olivier Giroud, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hakim Ziyech, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Crimson ClawYT

Thank you for creating Tytos Lannister.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

You had zero RS added to the article. Please add them swiftly because poorly sourced content may be contested or removed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 03:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retalitory edits

Please do not make retalitory edits like this one when you don't like another editor's handling of your contributions. I've explained clearly why I reverted some of your recent changes, it is more constructive for you to open talk page discussions to discuss and defend your edits.

Also, please only tag edits as "minor" when they meet the criteria; you seem to be tagging every one of your edits as minor and this may be construed as being intentionally misleading. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 14:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GameClip Hub

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GameClip Hub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not attacking anybody nor have I created a page that has attacked, threatened or disparaged anyone. The subject of this page is a YouTuber/Youtube Channel. The page is made as a source of information and has not been created to threaten or attack or disparage. Could you please explain what you mean by this accusation you have thrown at me. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You threatened myself, actually. This is your comment from the talk page (which was marked as an attack page - the article was marked for the subject not being notable): It’s a fairly new channel so there’s not much to write about but it is as important to me as your life is to whoever is wanting to delete this.. I value my life plenty, for the record. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 16:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Speeder bike, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". This is only one of many recent instances where you have mistakenly checked a significant edit as minor. I asked you to stop doing this over a month ago and am disappointed that you're continuing this practice. Please stop. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 16:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Susan MacDonald concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Susan MacDonald, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Susan MacDonald

Hello, Crimson ClawYT. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susan MacDonald".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Callum Hudson-Odoi

If no charges were filed, that's it. Don't restore the material - it's dubious to include until there's a conviction, much less as an accusation. Wikipedia isn't a permanent place for shaming people, please see the biographies of living persons policy, particularly the part concerning those accused of crimes. It's also inappropriate to report on whether somebody's been sick, unless the person or illness are unusually noteworthy. The mere existence of sources does not mean that everything ought to be included. Don't restore that again. Acroterion (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020–21 Burnley F.C. season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2020–21 Burnley F.C. season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sakiv (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had not finished editing. I was having trouble saving it so i decided to save it half finished. I hope it is ok now and there is no need for it to be deleted. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 20:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to rush to create these articles. It will be created by more experienced editors in due course.--Sakiv (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So is it being deleted? Crimson ClawYT (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–2021 Sheffield United F.C. season, you may be blocked from editing. Sakiv (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you being so hostile. I’m trying to create pages for the next season of the football. It’s not gonna have all the information of the new season and I’m sure people will edit them with the information once more is revealed. I don’t understand what your problem is. Banning me from editing for what. Can you please explain what I’m doing that is making you so aggressive towards me. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should speak in a more friendly tone. I sent you this warning because you are creating already existing articles!--Sakiv (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched for these articles and I have found no trace of them hence the reason why I’m making articles and linking them to the football clubs article pages. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The articles you create have a lot of problems so you should not create more until you have enough experience. As I can see you have less than 200 edits and only began editing in November.--Sakiv (talk) 21:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all respect, how am I supposed to get experience and edit and make pages when your telling me to stop. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 21:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be useful for you.--Sakiv (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Southampton F.C. season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020–21 Southampton F.C. season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 12:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

King's Lynn Town F.C.

Hello. You seem to be repeatedly reinstating several formatting errors to this article during edit conflicts. I have made corrections to all these, but you are reinstating them as I presume you are just copying the previous version back in every time we have an edit conflict. Could you edit the current version, rather than reinstate them again? Thanks, Number 5 7 23:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, sorry I was editing at the same time as you, didn’t notice. I see that you were able to link some of the footballers to their pages. I was wondering how you do that for future reference as I have not been able to find out. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 23:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to their article and copy the title – that will be the link (if you open the code of the table now, you'll see). Cheers, Number 5 7 11:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, really helped 👍 Crimson ClawYT (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019–20 Hashtag United F.C. season

The article 2019–20 Hashtag United F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The relevant notability guideline WP:NSEASONS allows for season articles for "top professional clubs", whereas this club's season was played at county league level. No evidence of enough independent reliably sourced coverage of the club's season to come anywhere near general notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Struway2 (talk) 09:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was also going to message you about this as I just saw you removed the prod. Season articles for clubs at this level are not deemed noteworthy. It was doubly disappointing to see you had removed the prod as I provided a link to the AfD on the club's previous season. It would be great if you could save us all the hassle of another AfD by accepting the article needs to be deleted. Cheers, Number 5 7 17:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David McGoldrick

Please don't update this article while the current match is in progress. There is no rush! Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He’s scored. It’s happened. How is it gonna undo itself. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No rush? Your just stopping me from doing it so you can do it yourself Crimson ClawYT (talk) 17:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will happily allow you the "glory" of updating this when the match is finished as I will be in the pub!. All sorts of things can happen before a match is over, so just wait. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The goal can’t be taken away and has been counted so he has scored. If he scores another goal then it can be updated but he has scored. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 17:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019–20 Hashtag United F.C. season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Hashtag United F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Hashtag United F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Struway2 (talk) 09:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Inbetweeners characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Reznov is non-notable

Viktor Reznov is non-notable. Please stop trying to recreate it under a new page title. -- ferret (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Reznov is a fan favourite character who is in three Call Of Duty games as a supporting character. How is that Non notable??? You just want to delete my work that took me ages to do. Crimson ClawYT (talk) 17:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, drop the hyperbole. I don't sit around gleefully rubbing my hands at the thought of deleting hard work. Being a fan favorite has nothing to do with WP:GNG, which is shown by sustained indepth coverage of Viktor Reznov specifically, and it just doesn't exist, any of the multiple times the article has been un-redirected. -- ferret (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jesse Lingard, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop making editorialized edits and marking them as minor. That is an abuse of process that may result in a loss of editing privileges. Your non-neutral edits were reverted. If you would like to help improve an article, contribute the to discussion on the talk page and seek consensus for changes. Minnemeeples (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hi Crimson ClawYT! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2021 storming of the United States Capitol that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olaf Koszela

The article Olaf Koszela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olaf Koszela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olaf Koszela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olaf Koszela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ferris Bueller

Hi. I see you have a habit of creating non-notable fictional character articles. Please do not restore redirects to such articles without discussion and WP:CONSENSUS on the main article's talk page. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 01:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at 2021–22 West Ham United F.C. season

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at 2021–22 West Ham United F.C. season. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 07:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Callum Connolly, you may be blocked from editing. You have been asked before to ensure that statistics are updated correctly. the date must be updated to reflect these changes. Telfordbuck (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonny Hilton. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Giant Snowman 14:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The stats table you added after this warning on the Sonny Hilton article was malformed, undated, incorrectly sourced, and strewn with errors. Please be more careful. Giant Snowman 15:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr Gilbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr Gilbert, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Gilbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]