Jump to content

User talk:Courcelles/Archive 112

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 105Archive 110Archive 111Archive 112Archive 113Archive 114Archive 115

Wikidata weekly summary #184

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #183

WikiCup 2015: The results

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to United States Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your work in relisting AfD discussions, which helps to keep matters in order. North America1000 07:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Graciano Rocchigiani / declined RfPP

Greetings. I recently tried to get the article for Graciano Rocchigiani protected, since an old "friend" of mine (under yet another IP) has made a beeline for it by reverting my cleanup edits. In fact, you recently had to PP two articles to ward them off: 1, 2. My RfPP for Rocchigiani was declined on the basis that the IP had not been given a warning. However, this is what tends to happen whenever anyone interacts with them: 3, 4, 5, etc. etc. It's always the same old diatribe—falsely labelling my edits as vandalism (when they themselves are not averse to a bit of actual vandalism: 6), not adhering to basic MOS, insisting on one format without consensus, etc. A generic message on their talk page is highly unlikely to achieve anything, so I'd like to take you up on that offer you made about the "liberal use" of SPP. Would be much appreciated. Or, since their edit pattern is so predictable, would it not be advisable for me to open up an SPI each time? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

It got PP'ed in the end, but it won't be the last time. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #182

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

5 Million: We celebrate your contribution

We couldn't have done it without you
Well, maybe. But the encyclopedia would not be as good.

Celebrate

Smallbones(smalltalk) 13:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Two options for this Sunday: Soviet Jewry Edit-a-thon & Women In Science Edit-a-thon

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for one of two edit-a-thons this Sunday, just bring your laptop and an interest in participating!

No special knowledge of the subject or Wikipedia knowledge is required, and there will be Wikipedia training workshops for new folks.


Soviet Jewry Edit-a-thon @ Center for Jewish History

  • 15 West 16th Street, New York, NY
  • 11:00 am - 4:00 pm, Sun Nov 22

Join at the Center for Jewish History (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to the American Soviet Jewry movement.


Women In Science Edit-a-thon @ NY Academy of Sciences

  • 7 World Trade Center - 40th Floor
  • 1:00 pm - 5:00 pm, Sun Nov 22

Join at the NY Academy of Sciences, during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to the lives and works of women scientists. Note that seating is limited for the Women in Science event, as well as signing up on-wiki, please RSVP by email.


Bonus event:

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Parole II

Inspired by the topic: I am so far pleased with the progress of my parole, suggesting infoboxes on the article talk. Most were taken by no objection, some after discussions. The only exception is Joseph (opera), infamous by having "ruined" my friend's RfA (but - as I was consoled - if that discussion had not existed people would have found another reason). Do you see a consensus? In other words, how important is the peace of an editor? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

In case you get to it, compare Il ritorno d'Ulisse in patria, TFA, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Forget that, we have bigger problems now. I was reminded by your simple accept statement to the request that I have "mess" on my user page (2012, well before the infobox revert case) and "amnesty" on my talk. The thought crossed my mind that a general amnesty for all victims of the GGTF case might solve a few problems, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Interesting idea, the GGTF case was just a utter mess all around, but I think mass-reverting the entire thing would be a bigger mess than we have right now. (And in all candor, I'm not sure there are any elegant solutions now, and if there are, my 2 AM brain isn't going to be finding them...) Courcelles (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
What would be difficult in unbanning the banned and lift the (utterly absurd in my eyes) restrictions? - I had a dream (and will write a template): fight/close/fill the gender gap by writing articles on women. One is pictured on the Main page now, hook idea by me;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Template for the dream --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Next radical dream: I noticed with a feeling of almost horror, that a candidate for featured article was deleted, reasoning that it was created by an alleged sock who was blocked. It's restored, and the block is on AN, because appeals to arbcom ("not a sock") were not answered. I met the author in question as an excellent content contributor, and am concerned about the deletion of valuable content (only one article was restored, to my knowledge) and the block of someone who could create more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
I see (in the navbox, - what an elegant way!) that a few more articles have been restored, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirect of Space exploration technologies toSpaceX and protection of redirect

Hi Courcelles, I'm overawed by what you have done for Wikipedia however I think this redirect is wrong :) I agreed there is a need to protect the redirect (as you have done) due to the persistent edit changes by an editor who wishes to overemphasis skyhook technology. Nevertheless, I'm troubled that the subject Space exploration technologies redirects to one company, albeit I very important company in this field and at the cutting edge of this field. I believe the term Space exploration technologies does warrant a stand alone article but not being an experienced editor and not having time to write (sorry about that) I feel it could be more appropriately redirected to Outline of space technology instead. Thanks for your time. Johnscotaus (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

I see why it was done, the SpaceX article begins "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX)", which makes the redirect at least justifiable. If you'd like to send it to WP:RFD, I'd happily tag the page. Courcelles (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

VampireProject23

Hi, just thought I would give you the heads up that the user VampireProject23 has copied your user page and thus falsely claiming to be an admin etc. I'm sure there is a policy for such false representation, but I cant find it and have to go to work now so thought I'd just let you know. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #186

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #185

Wikidata weekly summary #114

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #187

Wednesday December 9, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

This month, we will also host a Newcomer's Wiki Workshop for those getting started on the encyclopedia project!

We will also include a look at our annual plan and budget ideas, and welcome input from community members on the sorts of projects the chapter should support through both volunteer and budgetary efforts.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One talk this month will be on use of Wikipedia press passes for photographers.) Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


Bonus events, RSVP now for our upcoming editathons:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Some questions if you have time...

Since once again people seem to be ignoring (what I would consider) the more problematic issues with checkuser pronouncements, could you answer a few questions (within your ability - without disclosing any private data) about the recent ColonelHenry/JacktheVicar issue? I am not interested in if he is a sock or not - except to the extent of how that may be confirmed. Mike V heavily indicated the Checkuser came back as a match based on technical data, however the WMF's privacy and data rentention policies indicate that the information which the Checkuser tool uses to determine that should have been deleted/anonymised given the length of time since ColonelHenry was active. Can you confirm what the type of information was used to give a positive result? Was it a match based on private/non-public data (such as useragent strings which should have been purged), semi-public (and always retained) like IP addresses edited from (although the WMF's policy indicates ColonelHenry's IP as a registered user should not have been kept that long either) or behavioural? Someone has also mentioned there was the prospect of previous checkuser results run aginst unrecorded (in the SPI archives) IP/Socks that may have been run against in the past (overlapping with CH/JTV's editing windows - however again previous checkuser's run against CH should have been purged by now).
The reason I am looking at this is because this is the second (overt) incidence in recent times (the first being where WMUK staff members abused their checkuser access) that indicates either private/non-public data on editors is being kept far longer than the WMF's policies allow for, or that Checkusers are (and unfortunately I have no way of softening this) over-stating the results of their investigations. -edit- Just noticed the limited time banner at the top, if you dont have time to respond in detail could you point me at a third party unrelated to the current issues? I did actually explicitly ask for what information was available in the WMUK case for them to run a check against given the 3 years since the original editor's activity, however I never got a straight answer as either they didnt understand what I was getting at, or were being deliberately evasive. Thank you for your time. Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
If you can wait until the 13th, I can try to give you a detailed response, but I only get three hours of Internet here in San Juan, and may not find more for a few days. I'm not involved in the colonelhenry stuff, so any CU should be able to help you. Courcelles (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
No I don't mind waiting, would rather the incidental arguments die down anyway. This is a busy week and Fallout 4 is the hitting on the 10th, so by the 13th is fine Only in death does duty end (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Home, though digging out of a two mountains, one of laundry, one of email. Courcelles (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
My father, while living in Darwin, used to holiday in Kuta. He'd arrive at the airport with a small carry-on consisting of 1) a pair of shorts 2) a paperback 3) an extra pair of flip flops and 4) his passport. Though it raised some eyebrows at security when he had no baggage to check he'd tell them "if you need more than this, you're doing it wrong". --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Fourteen days, multiple formal dinners, four countries, two continents, stormy weather, and nearly 10,000 kilometers require more than a single carry-on, much to my annoyance at schlepping it around. The only saving grace was not coming home with more than I started with. Actually, given a door destroyed a shirt, I had less coming home! Courcelles (talk) 03:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
When I was in Australia formal dining meant putting on a shirt.... I need to set up a dedicated sandbox page so no hurry. The latest brouhaha at ANI is dying down now but it appears I still have to match wits with the unarmed for a bit. Only in death does duty end (talk) 06:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
I have updated with some follow-on questions. No hurry at all, I understand you may not have the information or be able to get it, just something I am looking into. If it helps, the results/conclusions will not be posted anywhere other than on-here or meta. (I have already had one email from someone who shall remain anonymouse asking what I was doing) Unfortunately you drew the short straw because I am pretty certain you are neither involved with any issues nor even suspected of misdoings by anyone :) Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Another update. Regards. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Juelz Ventura

Could you please restore the Juelz Ventura wiki page? She meets the requirements for notable pornographic actresses as per pornographic actors guidelines.|}} More specifically point 2. as she has won multiple AVN awards (http://cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2012/01/23/the-2012-avn-award-winners-a-review-of-the-best-in-adult-entertainment#.Vl3Szr9fA3g). As per point 3, she has also made mainstream appearances such as in the music video for "Killing You" by "Asking Alexandria" and on "The Morning After Podcast (http://themorningafterpodcast.com/)

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #188

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
  • Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Nomination of Courtship disorder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtship disorder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtship disorder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — James Cantor (talk) 17:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

James Cantor, other than a vandalism revert five years ago, I don't appear to be connected with this article at all? Courcelles (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #189

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Thank you

For banning me from participating in the Kevin Gorman arbitration case. I hope, however, that you did not intend this as a punishment but as a reprieve. The real sanction is on the participating members of the case, whom I send my best wishes with a metaphorical release of peaceful white doves in their honor. Here's wishing you all the best for 2016. Viriditas (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

absolutely no punishment intended. If you have something you decide you do want to submit, both arbcom-l and my personal email are open. Courcelles (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite, but I was totally serious! I'm thankful to not be involved in this anymore. Viriditas (talk) 08:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
A totally understandable feeling for anyone getting involved in the arbitration process! Courcelles (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

#wikipedia-en-admins IRC channel access

Hi, Courcelles. I posted a request for access to the admins' IRC channel (now that I've decided to come to terms with IRC, after almost three years with the mop :-)), but don't know how closely it's watched. Can you wave a wand or something so I can access the channel? I'm on #wikipedia-en, #wikipedia-en-clerks (for ArbCom) and #wikipedia-en-help. Thanks for any help and all the best, Miniapolis 00:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

My wife has the relevant permissions, so I've pinged her to look and help my clueless self. Courcelles (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much; I should've signed up (although I didn't know what I was doing :-)) when I passed RfA. All the best, Miniapolis 01:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
... and it's all good now; I'm just waiting for the cloak. Thanks again and all the best, Miniapolis 14:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to send one final follow-up on a message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 09:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to other languages.Help

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 08:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to other languages.Help

Wikidata weekly summary #190

Wikidata weekly summary #186

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 21:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to other languages.Help

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

Even though you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GVarnum-WMF (talkcontribs) 20:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 20:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to other languages.Help

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 06:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Please help translate to other languages.Help

Saturday January 16: Wikipedia Day NYC 2016

You are invited to join us at New York University for Wikipedia Day NYC 2016, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference as part of Wikipedia 15, the project's global 15th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory unconference, with plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

10:00am - 7:00 pm at NYU ITP Tisch School of the Arts, 721 Broadway (between Waverly and Washington Place)

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 17:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC) {{clear}}

Hi! Hope you're well. Over the past few days, I've been trying to track down the remaining sources for our potential FLC in the hope that we might finally get it finished. I've struggled a bit with the Vancouver Critics and the Venice Film Festival, but we're nearly there. We just need a lead and since I hate writing leads, I was wondering if you could give it a go when you have a bit of spare time? - JuneGloom07 Talk 02:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Confusion over page protection

I realize BLPs are a bit special and that administrators have more than the usual leeway in setting page protections, but I am confused about why this page has pending-changes-2 protection. It was my understanding that except for some grandfathered pages and OFFICE actions, pc-2 was not to be used. If this has changed, then the relevant documentation including WP:Page protection and WP:Pending changes needs to be updated. If this is a one-off case of WP:Ignore all rules that's fine as well, but I would ask that next time, specifically cite WP:IAR in the protection log when using pending-changes-2 if that's the reason you are using it (IMHO using PC2 instead of full protection in a case like this, where there is a specific request on the talk page to clean up the article, is a good use of WP:IAR, but others may disagree). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Yeah, it was a bit of an IAR call, but also the least-powerful tool available to stop the stream of autoconfirmed sockpuppets (I can find the SPI if needed), and let non-admins (specifically but not limited to Timtrent) continue to develop the article should they choose to do so. Courcelles (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's music

May our mouth be full of laughter, a comment from a psalm, with music 290 years old today, - Did you know that Handel has an infobox for a year now, today? But they still argue over Sibelius? Hallelujah ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #191

Talk:Experiment (ship)

Hi Courcelles, Happy New Year. I created the page Experiment (ship), which still exists, but had no hand in the talk page for the article. Do we know if Maj Turmoil's editing on that page was problematic? If not, can we restore the talk page? Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 23:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The talk page was deleted per WP:G5. You can recreate a talk page as you see fit, but I'm not going to restore a fairly useless page created by a banned user. Courcelles (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year Courcelles!

.

A kitten for you! Talk:Huntley Fitzpatrick

hi Courcelless, I have created the above talkpage, which you deleted, i hope this is okay.

Coolabahapple (talk) 07:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

great, thanks.Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

2016 year of the reader and peace

2016
peace bell

Thanks for your support in 2015, - ring the peace bell often! - Look for hidden music by Bach, Sibelius and Verdi! Love the latter especially, great to begin the new year with Verdi's wisdom ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Courcelles!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Kingdom of Hawaii attorney brought up in an odd post.

User:Aliejames left an odd post on my talk page here where they seem to declare themselves as proxy representative of Hawaiian Kingdom attorneys and request a deletion review. I have replied on my talk page and on theirs but, this may need admin attention. The editor previously created an article that was nominated for deletion (one proposed deletion and one deletion discussion) about nearly the same subject Edmund Keli’i Silva Jr.. Since the editor clearly made a declaration of representing the subject Nou Ke Akua Ke Aupuni O Hawaii, I googled them and verified that the name Aliejames is a person making public claims of a close connection to the organization.--Mark Miller (talk) 23:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

TY for the update on the PD. I for one always appreciate it when you folks take the time to talk to us and tell us what's going on. I hope all things personal get resolved for the best for you. Best, — Ched :  ?  19:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Slightly erroneous edit at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case?

Did you intend on changing the decline count from 3 to 0 with this edit? --Hammersoft (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

[46] Thanks :) --Hammersoft (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I was fiddling around between a straight decline and asking a question... that was my mistake. Courcelles (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

On a related note I have added a diff to my statement for you. There are more easily findable but I'm not really interested in making that sort of evidence unless it's actally going to be considered. I would also recommend IJBalls statement re adminacct. Only in death does duty end (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, we have three votes to accept, and I think it is always necessary for some context of someone's history as an admin. Courcelles (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

Typo

There is a typo at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kevin Gorman/Proposed decision#Kevin_Gorman; 2014 Admonishment with "On 26 February 2914, " --Jnorton7558 (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Saturday February 6 in NYC: Black Life Matters Editathon

Saturday February 6 in NYC: Black Life Matters Editathon

You are invited to join us and the AfroCROWD initiative at New York Public Library's Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture for our upcoming editathon, a part of the Black WikiHistory Month campaign.

12:00pm - 5:00 pm at NYPL Schomburg Center, 515 Malcolm X Boulevard (Lenox Avenue), by W 135th St

The Wikipedia training and editathon will take place in the Aaron Douglas Reading Room of the Jean Blackwell Hutson Research and Reference Division, with a reception following in the Langston Hughes lobby on the first floor of the building at 5:00pm.

We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

(Bonus upcoming event: WikiWednesday Salon @ Babycastles - Wednesday, February 17)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Wikidata weekly summary #194

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #193

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Ping

I've sent an urgent-ish Commons-related email your way. Could you take a look when you have a chance? Sorry to add to the zillions of emails you get in a day...--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

17:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #192

Merry Christmas and happy new year

Merry Christmas and happy new year. (:

--Pine

Season's Greetings

Wishing you a Charlie Brown
Charlie Russell Christmas! 🎄
Best wishes for your Christmas
Is all you get from me
'Cause I ain't no Santa Claus
Don't own no Christmas tree.
But if wishes was health and money
I'd fill your buck-skin poke
Your doctor would go hungry
An' you never would be broke."
—C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1914.
Montanabw(talk)