User talk:Costurk

Welcome!

Hello, Costurk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 20:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AKSA Power Generation (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKSA Power Generation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Anne Delong (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AKSA Power Generation (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKSA Power Generation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 20:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Costurk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

You may wish to take note of a comment that I have just left at the article. I did not want to review it formally a second time, so I have left you some additional advice there just now, after your edits. Fiddle Faddle 12:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for your patience and help.I have learned a lot with this experience.I did add some more proper WPRS hope this time it will work out . Best regards ==costurk==

How does good ref list work?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

can you help this comments qte Comment: I'm not going to review the article. I try not to review articles twice. But please consider how a reader will look at:

CNN NEWS 3 SPOKANE JOURNAL4 NW WIND POWER5 SABAH EKONOMI 6 CITY AM NEWS 7 AVRUPA POSTASI8 Hurriyet Daily News9 PR NEWS WIRE 10 This one has to go"" IRAQ Business News 11 EIN NEWS 12 Turkish News 13 CIHAN NEWS 14 maktoob news [15] Bloomberg news 16 FIFA news 17 FORBES 18 E-MANISA NEWS POERTAL19 business.reachlocal[20] turkish manufacturers[21] The list is impenetrable. Please turn it, IF the references are any good, into something readable. Look directly above it. It should look like that. And 100% of the references must be significant independent coverage about AKSA Power Generation from WP:RS

I think you could probably do with some help to do this. Try deploying Help me on your own talk page, link to this article and ask for help in turning the list into good references. Someone will come along and help you surprisingly fast. Costurk (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Costurk, the reviewers are saying two things. One is: you need references that are actually talking about AKSA Power Generation, and that are not press releases. That is what the latest review means by "This one has to go". The other is: instead of naming the publication or website and then adding a URL inside square brackets, each reference needs to give the title that appears on the page; the author if there is any; and the date, as well as the publication or website. And preferably the URL should be a link on the title. This can be done using citation templates, or you can just type it out, but either way, the last reviewer points out that references 1-6 have been done; the others should look similar. Use the code in edit mode to make the others look like that, but you will need to add the information that you have left out - date, etc. Is that clearer now? Yngvadottir (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Yngvadottir , I rearrange the all ref list as per your recommendations Costurk (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC) costurk[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AKSA Power Generation (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKSA Power Generation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

== thanks , I did some improvements as per your recommendations Arthur_goes_shopping === Costurk (talk) 11:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AKSA Power Generation (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKSA Power Generation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

== thanks One15969 I did add some more inline cites, regardsCosturk (talk) 06:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:AKSA Power Generation (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKSA Power Generation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 10:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC AKSA Power Generation was accepted

AKSA Power Generation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 11:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried my best to re-write your article and think the company is important enough to appear on Wikipedia. However, AKSA Energy seems to be a different company from AKSA Power Generation, so I have removed news articles that are about AKSA Energy. In future, please be clear which company you are writing about. Sionk (talk) 11:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]