Jump to content

User talk:CosmLearner/Archives/2024/October

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CosmLearner/Archives/2024 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think my edits are highlighted for adding conflicting reference and perhaps LLM-generated text. It wasn't my intention. I'm sincerely sorry for this. In future I'll add verifiable and reliable sources. I'll avoid using AI-generated text if it contains inaccurate information. I request to unblock the account. I'm interested to contribute in Wikipedia. Thank you for considering my request. 😬CsmLrner 16:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please give an example(as part of a new request) of a properly sourced edit. I'd also like to see a commitment to not use an AI or LLM to create edits. Using LLMs is problematic for reasons beyond that they can generate inaccurate information. 331dot (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@331dot I've added a new unblock request with an example of properly sourced paragraph and commitment to not use an AI or LLM to create edits. Please review. 😬CsmLrner 17:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CosmLearner/Archives/2024 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

An example of a properly sourced edit - In human body, there are two kidneys located at the back of the abdominal cavity, on either side of the spine, just below the rib cage, adjacent to the back. The colour of kidneys is reddish.[1][2] The outer side of the kidney is convex, and the inner side is concave. The fold in the concave part is called the hilum. From the hilum, the ureter and renal vein exit, and the renal artery enters the kidney. Two ureters emerge from the two kidneys and enter the bladder.[3] The funnel-shaped wide part of the ureter is called the renal pelvis. kidneys are completely surrounded by a type of fibrous covering; it is called renal capsule. The part adjacent to the capsule is called cortex, and the inner part is called the medulla.[4] Both regions are composed of connective tissue and blood vessels. Typically, there are 8-12 renal pyramids in medulla. Expanding the tips of these pyramids forms the renal papilla. These papillae open directly into the pelvis. Each kidney has a special type of tubule called the uriniferous tubule. Each uriniferous tubule is divided into two parts: the nephron and the collecting tubule. Nephron produces urine, and collecting tubule carries the urine to the renal pelvis.[5]

References

  1. ^ "Kidneys: Anatomy, Function, Health & Conditions". Cleveland Clinic.
  2. ^ "HowStuffWorks How Your Kidney Works".
  3. ^ Silva's Diagnostic Renal Pathology. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87702-2.
  4. ^ Medical Physiology: A Cellular And Molecular Approach. ISBN 978-1-4160-2328-9.
  5. ^ The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations: Urinary System. ISBN 978-1437722383.

I also am aware of using AI tool's like LLM's. ⁤⁤I commit that in my future edits won't be used AI-generated text. Thank you for considering of my request.

😬CsmLrner 20:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I think that what you have written above shows that a basic understanding of the issues involved, so I shall unblock you to give you another chance. 👍 I hope that from now on you will be able to have a successful ime as an editor, without being blocked again.🤞 JBW (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request; no problem with whatever action they might take(though I am not the blocking admin). 331dot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

@331dot Thank you for your response. A lot of time has passed, and no other admin has reviewed it. So that is why I request you to review this block. 😬CsmLrner 08:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
It hasn't actually been that much time. Others have been waiting weeks and even months. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
@331dot Since I have understood the reason for being blocked, I believe I should now be unblocked. 😬CsmLrner 20:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
@331dot Since I have understood the reason for being blocked should unblock. 😬CsmLrner 20:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
My last review puts an end to my involvement here. Do not ping me again, please 331dot (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Generally, cites to books need to include page numbers, so the specific section of the book can be compared with the claim it is attached to. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 20:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Jmcgnh I know. The paragraph I have written here is not a real Wikipedia article or taken from any Wikipedia article. If it were a real Wikipedia article, the page numbers of the books could have been mentioned. I haven't mentioned p number here because the sentences in the paragraph are generally known to everyone. If it were expanded, the page numbers of the books from which the sentences were taken could have been cited. But it is just a paragraph and it's not possible to directly reference p number from books because the paragraph has been condensed without describing anything in detail.
When editing a real article, I will definitely follow the rules and add proper references. 😬CsmLrner 15:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

DISPLAYTITLE

I had to remove the WP:DISPLAYTITLE on your user page because it attempted a disallowed modification. A few hints:

  • whitespace is a modification, use padding instead
  • animation will not work
  • display will break the style it is used in, that's a software/configuration thing
  • the webkit fallback has been obsolete for years, just use background:<some image/gradient> text; color:transparent

The following should work

  • {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="text-transform:uppercase"><span style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; background:linear-gradient(to right,#00c6ff,#0072ff) text; font-weight:300; letter-spacing:4px; font-size:1.4em; padding: 10px 20px; border: 2px solid transparent; border-image: linear-gradient(45deg, #00c6ff, #0072ff) 1; color:transparent"><span style="font-weight: 800">U</span>SER:</span><span style="color:transparent; filter: drop-shadow(0 0 .3em red); color: transparent"><span style="background: linear-gradient(90deg, #0FF, #F0F, #FF0) text; padding:0 .5ch">C</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(90deg, #F0F, #FF0, #0FF) text">osm</span></span><span style="color:transparent; filter: drop-shadow(0 0 .3em red)"><span style="background:linear-gradient(90deg, #FF0, #0FF, #F0F) text; padding:0 .5ch">L</span><span style="background: linear-gradient(90deg, #0FF, #F0F, #FF0) text; color:transparent">earner</span></span></span>}}
  • USER:CosmLearner

You may want to tweak a parameter or two. ;) Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. CosmLearner (talk) contribs 19:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-41

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence, you may be blocked from editing. It has been already discussed that teacher resignation incident is not anti-Hindu, there is no reliable source that describes the incident as a communal one. And Indian mainstream media is also involved in the disinformation campaign as stated in the sources. There is a consensus that Al Jazeera is a reliable source. Do not remove the sourced contents. Za-ari-masen (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@Za-ari-masen Sorry for the delay in responding. The discussion is ongoing. You have expressed your personal opinion. How did you determine which incident is anti-Hindu violence and which is not? In that discussion, an editor who has not contributed to the article made such a comment.
Do not use Twinkle on other people's talk pages to express your personal opinion. Try it in the sandbox. CosmLearner (talk) contribs 15:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Why are you removing cited contents as you did here? Do Al Jazeera English and Prothom Alo seem unreliable to you? Za-ari-masen (talk) 10:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
@Za-ari-masen According Prothom Alo, Indian Republic TV have shared some fake news. Let me clear. An example- Fox news in USA has right wing bias. If fox news spread any misinformation doesn't mean whole American media is spreading misinformation.
Al Jazeera is not independent and funded by Qatar state Govt. It is an Islamist media. Go to the Talk:2024_Bangladesh_anti-Hindu_violence#Using_Indian_citation. There others have shared link why Al Jazeera is unreliable. BBC report and other links.
Personally, to me, Prothom Alo is reliable and share true news. Even for sharing true news there was cyber-attack on their website.
and Al Jazeera is totally an Islamic media and supports attacks on Hindus by Muslims in Bangladesh and unreliable. 
  • Why have I removed? 
You have added your personal opinion citing the news links. The sentences don't support the reference. 
and request to you that discuss to the article's talk page and don't keep repeatedly reverting.  CosmLearner (talk) contribs 11:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CosmLearner! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion for Draft:Sadiya Ayman

I have declined your speedy deletion request for Draft:Sadiya Ayman. Drafts duplicating an exiting article is not one of the speedy deletion criteria. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining. CosmLearner (talk) contribs 19:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Uncommented undos

Please see WP:RV: "In the edit summary or on the talk page, succinctly explain why the change you are reverting was a bad idea or why reverting it is a better idea." 109.255.211.6 (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Matia Chowdhury

On 21 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Matia Chowdhury, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion for Prof Rajaratnam Sivachandran

I have declined your WP:G4 speedy deletion request for Prof Rajaratnam Sivachandran because the article was not previously deleted via discussion (WP:AFD). Please read and understand the speedy deletion criteria before tagging any more articles for speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you. CsmLearner 💬🔬 16:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)