User talk:Coredesat/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Coredesat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Go raibh maith agat!
Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.
Sláinte!
hoopydinkConas tá tú? 04:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Stop!
Stop appearing on my watchlist while you're supposed to be asleep! Heh. Your thoughts welcome at Talk:1927 Nova Scotia Hurricane over the grading of the article - it's the one we discussed yesterday on IRC. – Chacor 13:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Four Square
It was not a test... You really need to be more responsible in your reverts. 64.131.30.48 06:38, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
-Well sure it is uncited, but so are the other variants in that section. The rules are not writen down anywhere but merely understood. 64.131.30.48 06:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Re:RfC
Then where do I state my case on the RfC??? — Alastor Moody (T + C + U) 22:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Coredesat
Hey Coredesat. Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 21:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Fire
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A765047
Fire is plasma.
Deal with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.103.51.85 (talk • contribs) .
- No, I disagree. BBC has it wrong. Ordinary fire is not hot enough to be a plasma. Here is a better explanation: [1]. Here's another: [2]. Examples of plasma on earth are lightning, and welding arcs. Fire can be plasma, but only when it is extremely hot, in very special circumstances. Antandrus (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Fire, continued
Greetings again: after my first response to the anon above, I posted the question to the Reference Desk. It looks like it is more complicated than a simple yes/no answer (like many things in life). The plasma (physics) article also has some information: fire is a special case of a very low temperature, partial plasma, but everyday "flame" does not fit the typical definition of a "plasma". See also the response received so far on the Reference Desk. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks
|
Hi, Coredesat, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
fffff
THanks. Delete this page, please. Machocarioca 07:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)machocarioca
I thought it was really funny that you reverted this minor vandalism, but missed out on this whopper ;) — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 08:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hear, hear! Poor guy seems really intent on getting that into the article – edited as an IP address first, then created an account and put it back in. I know Mighty Ducks was bad, but not that bad. — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 08:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: My review
Glad I could help with the review :) I believe you have a lot of potential for adminship, so just continue this way and we will surely have an extra administrator soon! -- ReyBrujo 03:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
3RR
When you make the report, here are the relevant difs: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] quite a few. Also a note about the pro-choice issue and note the repeated warnings and attempted discussions on his talk page. JoshuaZ 03:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Also, note that he just did it again. (I have been busy reverting all day on that page and so you should probably do the restore since I'm most likely technically over 3RR on that page already). JoshuaZ 04:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Article Deleted: Famous_Kapus
Hello,
Why was this article Deleted Please restore this Article..I was the one who created this Article. The names of People mentioned in this Article show the History of the Hindu caste!!!and forms a supporting article for the Kapu_caste Article... This caste is almost 2000 years old.. Some of the personalities mentioned in the Page belong to the 4th Century A.D. and are also eminent Poets and Linguists who composed great Literature works to build up the Indian Langauge Telugu spoken by 15 milliion Indians and is second most widely spoken language in the country..
Most of them were Politicians who broght Freedom to India and also were crucial in forming the state of Andhra Pradesh... Most of them might not be known internationally but are very well known Nationally and Regionally within India.
I saw your nomination for deletion of this article in Deletion Log. How do i get it restored ??? There are other similar pages from other communities but only this has been tagged for deletion... and has been deleted i can point them out...
I dont know how old the Hawian word Kapu is but the Hindu Caste Kapu is dated back to 2000+ years... So i guess there should be no confusion about that.
I cannot argue with you. Iam not conversant with Wikipedia policies iam just a normal user who was trying to put up some useful information..
There is one issue over here there was lot of Data that was collected on that page which was contributed by a lot of members... and at a very short notice this page was taken out.Either let us back up this Data that was collected in the page in some fashion so that we host is in some other place... I guess you should be able to help us with this...
To maintain consistency with Wikipedia deletion plicies please either restore this article or Make sure that other Communites donot run similar articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Famous_Kammas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Famous_Reddys http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prominent_Andhra_Kshatriyas
Famous Kapu
I understand that you are not the Administrator here are you saying you are ging to make sure that the rest of the articles mentioned here also wuld be deleted??? So whom do i approach this is becoming a very complicated matter and i dont know what to do maybe it would be great if you can help me !!!! Jaranda says i have to go to some Dispute resolution Forum ... I dont know whom to approach or where to post...
Commercial Links
You have removed a link to Nelsons Boats from the Copeland Islands page. However, Nelsons Boats runs the only licensed passenger boat service to the islands. The only other way of getting for the public there is by private boat. This means you hgave a page describing the islands, the wildlife etc but no indication of how anyone can travel there or gain access.
I understand the care required regarding commercial links but any links to any form of commercial transport would be banned as the only type it is sensible to mention are those that are licensed and therefore commercial.
somerset college
okok im sorry right but eriously i dont think you know the school, they treat the students as if they are dogs, and the headmaster doesn't know any of the pupils and is so wrapped up in himself that he parks right in the middle of the quad in front of the admin so he doesnt have to walk from the carpark to his office, this is when he actually bothers to turn up to the school hes SUPPOSED to be running. im vvery sorry 4 any inconvenience caused, but please understand my frustration.
re:fire
Thank you.
I am still new to using wiki, so I would like to apologize for my aproach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.103.51.85 (talk • contribs)
I'm a bit confused!
I'm sorry, I got a comment about how something I'd written had been changed, but I've never written anything on any wikipedia page ... I'm not that computer savy :) Sorry there must have been some mistake ...
Sailor Moon B class
I added more info for the manga versions of the Sailor Moon, adding ISBN numbers for the artbooks, which should help with referencing. Is there anything more that needs to be done that we glazed over or missed? I formatted the section like the anime section and added some extra info. Does it need more referencing? --Hitsuji Kinno 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
...
uhhhh...what should i do then?--Chikinpotato11 22:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
anyway, i modified it. Are you happy now?--Chikinpotato11 22:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC) i have no idea what you just said--Chikinpotato11 23:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
how can i talk to that guy if he doesn't have a userpage or a usertalkpage?--Chikinpotato11 23:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Your article
I moved your article to the main space: I'm just stopping by to say that I was thorougly impressed with the article. Great job! —Mets501 (talk) 14:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
DYK
- Posting from my talk page. – Chacor 10:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
|
On 10 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhoon Xangsane (2006), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Peta 10:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
VandalSniper
Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper! You have been approved. If have not already done so, you may find instructions to install VS on the project page.
As some of the libraries VandalSniper runs on are currently in transition, there have been a few issues reported with setup. At the moment, Linux is the most compatible platform for VS. If you have questions or problems, you may find help on the project page or its talk page. Please also feel free to contact me for help and I will do my best to assist you.
Thanks for becoming a part of one of Wikipedia's best new software tools! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Gary Kirk's RfA
|
Dear Coredesat/Archive_3 Thank you very much for voting in my request for adminship. In the end, not many people let their opinion be known, and I didn't get the mop just yet. I have already begun acting on the issues brought up by the community, and will continue to do so. If you have any more suggestions for me, feel free to let me know.
|
Re:
Wait, where'd you come from? I was talking to Nilfanion. He was the one who made the edits. I'm pretty sure he's capable of speaking for himself. He would understand the situation better. If you must know, I made an honest mistake and didn't notice that some were missing. I think that's forgivable. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 00:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- But you guys react so fast that you don't see me trying to correct this mistake. Re-reverting all those pages is irritating. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 00:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Congrats
Congratulations
After an impressive showing of community support, you're now an admin. Have fun with the new tools and use them conservatively, especially at first, an re-read the policies before acting. Dig in to help clear the backlogs as you get the hang of it. Keep up the good work, have fun, and again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 14:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Congrats and good luck :) - SpLoT 15:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Congrats on your promotion. Feel free to decimate and slaughter malicious & unrelenting vandals! Just kidding. Just kill 'em ;-) JungleCat talk/contrib 16:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, you stinkin' n00b!
Congratulations on surviving RfA! I'm too nervous to even go for it, though I'd like the tools. Anyway, can I make you work for a minute? ;) I'm really asking for more of a third opinion than anything else, but given that it involves WP:NPA, I'd rather an admin make the call. If you have a few moments, please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Pike (second nomination), which I put up for nomination. The subject is nn, imho, and the article is horrid fancruft, basically two lines from an old press release followed by a bunch of random WP:NPOV-violating salivations put in by random male fans, plus a Maxim-esque cleavage-enhancing promo photo of her, which User:Carnildo just nuked separately by happenstance (turns out someone uploaded it with a {{logo}} tag, which it obviously wasn't). Anyway, that's the backstory; look at the AfD itself, and you'll see where one editor voted "keep" with the comment that "Disagreeing with the political position of a radio show is not grounds for deletion and protection from recreation of an article." Since nobody anywhere in the AfD had said anything about politics up to that point, nor is it the reason I put the article up on AfD (as you'll see in the discussion, there's three other articles I would have had to AfD at the same time if this was a political move), I believe there's only one way to interpret that statement: as a personal attack on the nominator, i.e. myself, in an attempt to make later commenters think it's a bad faith nomination and vote accordingly. (I happen to have a pro-GOP userbox on my user page, which is likely where it comes from.) So I did what, sadly, WP:PAIN requires me to do in order to protect myself from potential further attacks: I put an {{npa3}} tag on his user talk page. The editor then responded both on the AfD and his user talk page, engaging in (IMHO) some serious Wikilawyering (which I consider rather unpersuasive) to attempt to say that not only was his statement not an NPA violation, but that it was actually me who was engaging in WP:NPA both by making the AfD in the first place and by accusing him of WP:NPA violations at all. (You'll see he got some help in this from another editor named Sparkhead, who likes to go around interfering in just about everything I and several other editors do because he's into 9/11 conspiracy stuff and we go around trying to get that stuff deleted, mostly successfully.) So, after this long ramble, my request: Would you look at it and, using your admin-powered brain, just make a determination as to who's in the right here? I don't even care if you post anything to the AfD or either of the editors, unless you feel there's been a violation of good faith strong enough to require it. I just want to know if I did the right thing or not. Thanks, --Aaron 16:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I respect it as it is; no need for me to seek out another admin. I'd probably go back and blank my comments based on your opinion, but in the interim, admin Arthur Rubin, who ought to know better, went in and blatantly called me a bad faith nominator, so I'm just going to leave the whole thing as-is; my only option at this point is to let other editors make their own decisions as to who's being honest and who's trying to defame others. --Aaron 18:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations!
My pleasure, and congratulations! Jayjg (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
congrats
well done. I am sure you will do great with your new tools and be of great assistance to the project. Wikipediarules2221 21:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Congratulations, Coredesat! If you have any admin-related questions, feel free to contact me. Nishkid64 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Congratulations! And thanks for the tip-off, although I haven't changed my vote. Rama's arrow 02:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. PT (s-s-s-s) 00:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
210.48.96.194
Thanks for taking care of that. Cheers! --Valermos 20:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Elonka's RfA
Hi. Could you check out [14] for me, and my second edit as well? I was repairing damage caused by [15], which he says was an accident. I just want somebody to cast a second pair of eyes over it and check I did right. Many thanks. --Guinnog 06:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I saw on WP:AIV that you indefblocked this IP for vandalism. However, a whois goes to a cable internet company, which may use dynamic IPs. It might not be a good idea to indefblock this IP right off the bat. --Coredesat 20:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- It is a softblock, so logged-in editors should be able to work. I can reduce the block if you think that this would be wiser in this instance. (aeropagitica) 20:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I didn't notice that it was a softblock, but shortening it is probably a good idea. I'd recommend reducing it to maybe a week or two at most, then go on and give a longer block if the IP starts vandalizing again. --Coredesat 20:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I will reduce it to two weeks and keep an eye on their activities once it expires. Regards, (aeropagitica) 20:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Knowing that you're backlog clearing type, I suggest you keep this somewhere handy:
Cheers, Netsnipe ► 20:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Weird things....
Hi. I can see that you blocked User talk:62.75.221.178. I remember to have reverted several examples of vandalism from this IP. However, now it seems that the edits of this anon user have vanished....with the consequence that my reverts either seem as changing nothing, or what is rather unpleasant [16], that I made the vandalism. This seems all very spooky to me - hope you will help me sort out what happened! Bertilvidet 23:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, maybe it makes sense anyway. I remember when I reverted the vandalism my internet connection was working really slow. So while my computer slowly was reverting, someone else reverted the vandalism with the result that my revert actually reverted the reversion of the vandalism - it seems that this also happened at Sahaba, where the mistake luckily caught my attention. Please note that both my failed revert-attempts at Sahaba and House of Saud are registered for the very same minute as the actual rvv. Bertilvidet 23:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Muchas gracias
Hey Coredesat, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi 04:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Elephant (Wikipedia article) (Wikipedia articles for deletion debate)
You did realize that the majority of the keep votes, like my own "merge to Elephant (Wikipedia article) (Wikipedia article)" vote, were jokes correct? --tjstrf Now on editor review! 06:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Obviously you didn't intend any harm. Themed votes or joke voting (especially on BJAODN-type pages) isn't particularly uncommon, and any admin who bothered to read the page would count, for example, User:Aaron's Super strøng nude høuse of wacky peøple keep. as a humourously masked delete vote anyway. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 06:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
My RFA!
|
Coredesat, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and kind words on my RFA! --plange 23:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC) | 
|
Seems you have a fan club :/
User:Bullshimoot3. I don't know how to go about deleting that, but I think it would fall in the case that you could delete if you want. Don't worry, I warned him as well. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Cool, and nice work. :) Hurricanehink (talk) 01:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Congrats!
Just wanted to extend congratulations on your successful RfA. I didn't realize you were up for it or I would have joined the almost unanimous support that you received. I've seen you around AfD quite a bit and think you do an awesome job. Cheers! --NMChico24 07:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Good work, I'm sure you'll do very well with the tools. riana_dzasta 09:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations, Coredesat! I was happy to support you. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your promotion, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian ※ Talk 21:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Congrats on your successful RfA! I really ought to pay closer attention to RfA - seen you around a lot, after reading the signpost I had the cliche thought "what, he wasn't already an admin?!". Anyhow, congrats again! --AbsolutDan (talk) 12:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Coredesat, could you copyedit my sandbox article (User:SpLoT/Cryoseism) when you're free? And also move it into mainspace when it's ready. Thanks so much. - SpLoT / (talk) 09:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry, I copied the message from Chacor's :S Thanks! I will start with the references now. - SpLoT / (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. I appreciate that you took the time to comment, and I did pay close attention to your thoughts, as I do find it a valuable thing to understand how I am perceived by others in the Wikipedia community. If there is anything that I can do in the future to help further address your concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. --Elonka 08:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I was in the middle of satisfying WP:CORP when you deleted the article, so it's been recreated. I don't think it qualifies as speedy delete now. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
WPTC Member of the month
You were selected by the WikiProject as the November 2006 Member of the month. To see the full award read the November 2006 newsletter. Congratulations!--Nilfanion (talk) 00:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Joseph Blanchette
I couldn't help but notice that you deleted Joseph Blanchette based on the AfD discussion from early 2005; however, that decision was overturned in later discussions. I would link you to the relevant pages, but I'd need access to the talk page code from Joseph Blanchette and Legendary Frog (the latter having been deleted as an empty redirect the next day). CaptHayfever 03:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is what happens when I have a busy week; I miss something like that. Wonderful. CaptHayfever 17:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly - Episode 3
This is an automated message to alert you that Wikipedia Weekly Episode 3 is now accessable for download.
The full download list of options is at wikipediaweekly.com - you can also get Wikipedia Weekly via a podcast client or iTunes (we're in the itunes store)
Enjoy :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tawkerbot (talk • contribs) .
Ahh, forgot to sign/ timestamp -- Tawker 03:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
In Strict Confidence
Hello. You recently speedy-deleted In Strict Confidence. While it was just a stub, I was surprised Wikipedia had nothing on them. You suggested it was A7 ("unremarkable/vanity"). Fair enough, they aren't properly mainstream but they still whack up a hefty 1.1m google hits, and have released 9 albums. They are perhaps better known in their native germany (German wikipedia has a page on them here de:In Strict Confidence), but I still think they are well-known enough elsewhere to gain their own entry. (Plus, if you give me the article back, I'll improve it so it's not quite so lame :-) --h2g2bob 03:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ta, many thanks :D --h2g2bob 03:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
About my Vandalism?
I don't understand, what did I vandalize? I tried to ask Splot, but he just said he won't speak to me further on the matter. I really would like to know. I mean, how can I correct my mistakes if I don't even know what I did. Furthermore, I am not some stupid 12 year old on a kick. I am a full time college student much like you, though I am going to school for Aerospace Engineering and am only a Junior, but I am an older junior at 24. Anyway, if you could let me know what I did wrong I'd appreciate it. Thanks. (SlimJimmy 10:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC))
Is it possible to get an explanation as to what would make the word Defunkitated acceptable to Wikipedia? Even if it is in Encyclopedia form it gets deleted. Does it not have any significance because it is relatively new? (SlimJimmy 10:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)) Thanks in advance
About the Deletion of "Samaritan Befrienders Hong Kong"
I quite agree with deleting pages with violation to copyright. But this time, I'm sorry to say that it is not the case here. The editors of the page "Samaritan Befrienders Hong Kong" during the past few days are students who are fulfilling the task assigned by the teacher. So after the deletion of that page, history of the contributions have all gone, leaving us empty-handed with no work to be handed in to the teacher. The students are new users of the wikipedia, and might not be so acquainted with the regulations of wiki, and may have violated the copyright this way or another. But after all, their performance will be judged by the teacher, so the deletion of this article will become all unnecessary.
I would appreciate it very much if you can restore that article. And after the due date of the assignment, which is Nov.15, the deletion of the page "Samaritan Befrienders Hong Kong" will be at your will. And if it cannot be restored, please be kind enough to send us a copy of this page to "hkusamaritan[at]hotmail[dot]com"
- Seems the page was restored anyway. I guess class projects are the new thing at WP. Montco 14:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Mirage Source AfD
Hi. I notice you closed the Mirage Source AfD and deleted Mirage Source, but didn't delete Mirage Online and Secrets of Mirage which were nominated in the same AfD? Was this deliberate? Cheers --Pak21 09:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
A quick question
You're an admin, so I guess I'll ask you. Please see my user page header (here). On it, I have some lyrics to a song by My Chemical Romance. Chacor thought it would be a good idea to ask an admin if it would be okay to keep the lyrics, and if there were any copyright laws or anything. So, am I breaking any rules by putting the lyrics there, or can I keep them? →Cyclone1→ 00:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I will. Thanks. →Cyclone1→ 01:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Tropical Cyclones Portal
Hey, can you fix the featured picture in the TC Portal? Thanks Good kitty 15:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Vernian Process Deletion
I have already sent this to the wiki contact e-mail, but since you approved the deletion of this article. I will send it to you as well:
I would like to address the deletion of the article "Vernian Process". It was voted that this music project did not meet the notability guidelines of your "encyclopedia". However I have a number of issues with this decision.
1. So according to your guidelines, a completely pointless and generic band can have an article as long as it is signed, or has gone on a national tour. Yet a music project that strives to create something completely unique isn't notable because it isn't on the cover of SPIN?
2. Giving ones art away for free, instead of using the services of a record label, prevents one from achieving notability?
3. I can go through wikipedia right now and find at least 20 bands that have valid articles, that don't meet any of these guidelines, yet they are all still very much active?!
4. Obviously somebody found this project notable, as they linked it in various other articles relating to the genre "Steampunk". (this was not done by myself).
So if you can give me a real valid reason why this article was deleted, I will leave it at that.--FACT50 09:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok I feel super dorky doing this, but members from Abney Park have mentioned Vernian Process being an inspiration to their project. Posted by Robert the founder of Abney Park. I don't understand how their blogs are less reliable than media however? --FACT50 20:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't understand how you can say that Abney Park never mentioned VP as an influence, when there is a valid post from the creator of the band right in front of you. Think about the context you are looking at this with. What you are basically asking (no telling) me to do is to ask Robert politely if he can add a reference on his wikipedia article mentioning my project? That is beyond ridiculous. How is anything on wikipedia more valid than anything on LJ or MySpace? Please answer this for me? --FACT50 21:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)--FACT50 20:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, well Robert has said that he will be contacting you very soon to confirm this himself. He was just as taken aback as I by the deletion of this article. --FACT50 01:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't understand how you can say that Abney Park never mentioned VP as an influence, when there is a valid post from the creator of the band right in front of you. Think about the context you are looking at this with. What you are basically asking (no telling) me to do is to ask Robert politely if he can add a reference on his wikipedia article mentioning my project? That is beyond ridiculous. How is anything on wikipedia more valid than anything on LJ or MySpace? Please answer this for me? --FACT50 21:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)--FACT50 20:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ok I feel super dorky doing this, but members from Abney Park have mentioned Vernian Process being an inspiration to their project. Posted by Robert the founder of Abney Park. I don't understand how their blogs are less reliable than media however? --FACT50 20:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Chess game
I'm inviting you to a match over at the Coffee Lounge (I'll be playing as white). If you have time, let me know on my talk page. After I have typed this message, the next edit of mine will be my first move. Good luck! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 17:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Ambar - deleted and then restored
Not sure if this has been pointed out, but it looks like AfD screwed up. Just to start the ball rolling and institute a culture change, I'm trying to get all admins closing things at AfD to remember to check the page history of an article before deleting, so that drastic changes in the nature of a page are spotted, and also urging those voting at AfD to do the same. See the following for details:
Copied to closing admin, restoring admin, deletion nominator, all who voted in the AfD discussion, and the AfD talk page. Carcharoth 23:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|