User talk:Junglecat

; Archives
	Sept 2005 – Aug 2006; Sept 2006 – Dec 2006; Jan 2007 – Aug 2007; Sept 2007 – ?;

Please click here to leave me a new message. Thanks!

Good work, friend...

		The Original Barnstar
		For doing a darned fine job on removing vandalism. :-) Take care, pal. Scarian ^Talk 23:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I try and help out when I can with my busy schedule. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 23:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Awsome Revert - 2 times

yea, thats pretty cool. Keep up the good work! Tiptoety 00:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need your advice

Hey there Junglecat, if you have time could you visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Houston, Texas? I'm not asking for your vote, just a sanity check! Am I wrong here? Thanks again for your help! Postoak 22:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

SJP has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks, this is very nice. Cheers! JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 01:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My (KWSN's) RFA

Thank you for commenting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. I'll try to make some changes based on your comments. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support

Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GlassCobra's RfA

		My RFA
		Hey Junglecat! Thanks for your outspoken support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! GlassCobra 02:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the revert on the Food science article. I greatly apprecaite it. Chris 19:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. All in a days work... ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 20:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my rfa

If you voted in my RFA...

...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations.

Thank you again and, best regards. VanTucky ^Talk

This RFA thanks was inspired by Lara❤Love's

Thanks for your vote

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a vote of (53/0/1).

As a token of my appreciation, please accept this bowl of tzatziki.

I feel honored to be trusted by so many of you. Wikipedia is such a large community, that my acceptance in the face of such large numbers truly is humbling. I will use my new tools to continue the tasks for which you entrusted them to me.

Gratefully, EncycloPetey (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imagery

There was a better version a few edits back which I moved it back to. Is that ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberdalek (talk • contribs)

That's OK with me - Go for it. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like ED vandalism

But he's blocked now...[1]--MONGO 00:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two IP's at least. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like 3 now...you're almost famous! If you get adminned, maybe you'll get enshrined like I did...see all the perks you might get!--MONGO 00:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He he he.... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

I wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 06:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OhanaUnited's RFA

.:

Thank you!

:.

Thank you for participating in my 2nd RfA and supporting me! My RfA passed unanimously at 79 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral. I would like to take this opportunity to thank AndonicO and Rudget for nominating me. I also want to thank LaraLove for persuading me to keep going after I failed my first RfA.

To be really honest, I am surprised that my RfA passed without any oppose or neutral. Being an administrator means more responsibilities, especially when I'm now an administrator on both English Wikipedia as well as WikiSpecies. I promise everyone that I will use the tools effectively to serve the community. If you need help on anything, don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Last but not least, remember the motto for Ohana: "When it comes to family, nobody gets left behind."

Once again, thanks for placing your trust in me to help the community. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

User Page Vandalism

Your user page was recently vandalized, and reverted by me. See your history for further review. Advise an Admin of your situation. --InvisibleDiplomat666 (talk) 06:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Mills

It was worth it, and it wasn't an experiment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs) 23:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How did you know I was adding trash to Wikipedia so fast? Are you there? Or is there a detector that takes away your edit every time you post a swear word? Just respond! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.195.15 (talk) 03:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting better at RCP... ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Vandalism

Got one on yours. :-) --ScaldingHotSoup (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! I owe you one - Take care... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 19:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suzanne Engo

I'm just letting you know that another user has all but blanked this article and is now attempting to have it deleted. John celona (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thanks for commenting in my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I know you have concerns about me as an administrator, and I certainly invite you to keep an eye on my work and bring any problems you see to my attention. Thanks again for taking the time to comment!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

that wasn't me...i swear it. either someone hacked onto my account, or my little brother did it. I'm sorry. I checked the history and saw what happened. If it offended you, I'm sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwiki (talk • contribs) 18:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fizzle (nuclear test)

On 10 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fizzle (nuclear test), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 15:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank-spam

Junglecat, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 01:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--MONGO 01:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)==My RfA==[reply]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust it me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Effects of Hurricane Ike in Texas

Thanks for adding some images to the above linked article. Its always great when those with firsthand experiences can add their work to article space. Best wishes.--MONGO 01:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was an interesting experience with Ike, but not as bad as Rita was. I have other cool photos I need to sort through and upload at commons. When I get time I'll post them. I've been really busy in real life lately and just don't have the free time to edit... :-( JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that busy part...me too. Anyway, good to see you still around!--MONGO 02:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded there! Good to see both of you around, by the way; and Junglecat, thanks for those photos: that's exactly the kind of thing Wikipedia needs. (Watch us get an earthquake here for me saying that, LOL) Antandrus (talk) 02:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And best wishes to both you two! Indeed it is good to see the dedication of some of Wikipedia's best contributors continue to endeavor here. Take care... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 02:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Time Cover Glenn McCarthy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time Cover Glenn McCarthy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to accept this - if not, you can count on my support. - Mafia Expert (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images for deletion

Thanks for the tip, I added some of your stuff. You better give a fair use rationale like I did here, otherwise they start complaining again. Good luck, and we better keep on eye on this guy. - Mafia Expert (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did, I used the template you had added. Did you see INTGAFW's comment here? Apparently, this fellow Damiens.rf has a history of slapping IfD templates rather than doing the checking on the correct rationale if warranted. His deletion reasoning has me concerned for other images of magazine covers. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 01:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Hope 2009 is a great year for you!--MONGO 15:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I hope things will go well for you too! I have my eye on some redlinks and some stuff that needs to be written, so I hope to see you around soon. Real life can slow you down on some things you would like to do. But hey, I'm not complaining, I'll fill you in later... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 05:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MFD notice

User:Junglecat/marriage has been nominated for deletion at MfD. //roux 18:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling meth lab article

Hi. I de-orphaned your Rolling meth lab article. Are you going to create a DYK entry for it? -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 05:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you nominate it for me? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 18:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I was reading the instructions at DYK, and timing is stressed as critical to get feedback from others. I went ahead and nominated the article here. Thanks for adding the other categories to the page. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 22:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rolling meth lab

On February 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rolling meth lab, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on that! It's a funny coincidence: I was just looking for information on these things a couple days ago and couldn't find what I was looking for on Wikipedia (they're a nasty and growing problem, including near where I live, and I just saw something on TV about it) -- and then here it is, a new article by you, just what I was looking for. All the best, Antandrus (talk) 00:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Antandrus! It’s always good to hear from you. On this one, we both agree. I have been hearing about these too for a while. I want to look into some possible sources I have to hopefully expand this article. This subject is a growing problem that the general public needs to know about for sure. I now wonder, how many times I have come across a trash bag on the side of the road (walking, biking, or riding with someone on a country road), and the bag was the remnants of a lab? Ugh! or Yikes!... You take care! JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 01:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to look here

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/18/cuban-spies-shortwave-radios-defy-detection/?page=2

Someone is "borrowing" your picture without attribution... Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad… actually that’s kinda cool! I released that one into the public domain quite a while back, so photo-wise they do not have to acknowledge my acct unless they want to. They did give credit to Wikipedia.org however which is OK. Another thing that is to me kinda ironic, that exact same make and model shortwave radio was in my possession many years back during the Reagan years (this one I acquired a few years ago, the original my cousin has now). I used to be able to hear Numbers stations on the thing and I never thought back then that it was a communication between governments and spies. How ironic that this same type of analog shortwave receiver photo was selected for the article. He he… Like I said, not bad. ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Paul CW Chu.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paul CW Chu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jackl 07:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice pic

I like the pic you have on your userpage...nice...hard to imagine it has already been 8 years now. Hope you're doing well these days!--MONGO 04:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! It is good to hear from you. The photo is an awesome one that helps me think of our loss that day which will not be forgotten. Wow, 8 years seems like yesterday. Someone slow that clock down please! And my thought on the matter - Our enemies will not prosper; I am a man of faith. I think I will leave my page as-is for the time being. Changing subjects - I want to get more into my photography contributions to the project. I have a bunch of photos on my PC I need to review and consider submitting over at Commons. Right now I am really busy (I know, said that before), but maybe I will get an opportunity to post some more there real soon. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Send me a link via my userpage or email and let me see them when you ahve time...good to see you still around.--MONGO 03:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will do, later... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TexasHistComm.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TexasHistComm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this

I was reading about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vsevolod_of_Kiev and at the tops it said I had a new message (I don't even have a username for wiki)

And then this showed.

Latest revision as of 19:00, 23 March 2008 [edit] March 2008

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your test is here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 19:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure how this is a 'new' message. I guess it got lost in cyberspace. I did not live in this house in 2008, so not sure whats up with all this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.225.87.110 (talk) 09:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You must have been given a IP address that someone else was using. Forrest Gump would say “It happens”. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 20:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo location

Hi there. You uploaded File:Norfolk Southern Engine.jpg to Commons back in 2007. Do you recall where it was taken? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Duff Goldman of Charm City Cakes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Duff Goldman of Charm City Cakes.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Johnsons Bayou

I would like to talk to "Jungle Cat" about Johnsons Bayou. Lived there as a child, I'm now 81 years old. Please e-mail me at mrd1932@cableone.net.

  (72.24.251.142 (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Junglecat/marriage

User:Junglecat/marriage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Junglecat/marriage (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Junglecat/marriage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malicious compliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malicious compliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malicious compliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Junglecat/marriage

User:Junglecat/marriage, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman 4th nomination and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Junglecat/marriage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Go Brandon

Great work! Why do you even need to go through AfC? I'd advise you to be BOLD and post this to the mainspace straight away (maybe after the RfD is done so as not to disrupt the process though). But there's definitely encyclopedic merit here. Let's go!!! Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a difference a month makes - I'd have agreed with the consensus at the F Biden AfD in September! & more sources will continue to emerge Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I meant to send the above to GlobGenie. Assumed you were the main contributor but obviously you've been here for a while :P Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Polemic marriage userbox

As you well know, that userbox was deleted in an MfD last year (Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman_4th_nomination) where the closer stated "Consensus is quite clear ... that these templates ... violate the guideline on userbox content restrictions (WP:UBCR) because they are "inflammatory or divisive" and "propaganda [or] advocacy", as prohibited by that guideline."

Therefore, recreating it by stealth on your userpage is seriously not a good idea for multiple reasons, and I have removed it. Furthermore, re-creating it again (by whatever means) will certainly result in a sanction. Thank you, Black Kite (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother fighting it. You'll only end up being blocked/banned. GoodDay (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
Update your signature to fix the error.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]