User talk:Coopkev2

Blocked Edit

Good Morning Coopkev Why are you saying my edit is wrong, the sister channels are correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.44.49 (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to Watch (TV channel), your edit is not vandalism, it is simply linking to the wrong articles. If you wish to add more TV channels to that article, feel free to do so, but do not include [[ ]] around them. Also, please remember to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~) «Coopkev2»^(talk) 17:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of LlamaBot

I have nominated LlamaBot, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LlamaBot. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. カラム 20:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Coopkev2/Sandbox

User:Coopkev2/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Coopkev2/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Coopkev2/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --PrimeHunter (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Greensburg-Decatur County Airport

Recently you reverted an edit to Greensburg-Decatur County Airport, using Huggle. The edit which you reverted blanked a section, and I know from my own use of Huggle that this is likely to look like vandalism. However, on this occasion the blanking was legitimate: it was removing an unsourced and heavily POV edit. Care is needed using Huggle. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. Typically the Controversy section is removed as vandalism by a user who disagrees with the negative POV, but I see that in this case it was unsourced (as you said). I shall take more care in the future. «Coopkev2»^(talk) 21:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vote in the elections

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the election process. I'm sorry you were unable to vote in the elections; but you do not meet the suffrage requirements (you only had 129 mainspace edits by March 31).

The error message you had was, indeed, erroneous because it had accidentally been left untouched from the last ArbCom elections. While confusing (and since fixed), it did not affect the actual requirements for being able to vote. Thank you for bringing the error to our attention. — Coren ^(talk) 19:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I could help, thanks for clearing up the confusion. «Coopkev2»^(talk) 03:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coopkev28, You write - "Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jason Derülo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. «Coopkev2»(talk) 17:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant no"

Hi Coopkev28, I'm sorry about that, it's the 2nd time something like this has happened. I only got this computer in March-April 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.99.36 (talk) 09:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]