Jump to content

User talk:Coningsby/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Poor Law Amendment Act 1834

Hi there. I noticed that you removed a sourced sentence from Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 but forgot to include an edit summary.[1] Is there a particular issue with the sentence? Road Wizard (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. You may want to use edit summaries a bit more than you have been doing though; it saves time by removing the need for these pointless questions. ^_~ Road Wizard (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI

http://appasp.chiswickw4.com/server/app/forum/ShowMessage.asp?ID=628000
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something" - Schrandit (talk) 23:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Just thought you should know that Robin Taylor (almost certainly User:Multiculturalist) holds you in the same esteem as myself, and to advise you to watch for socks. - Schrandit (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
No worries, but seriously, watch out for the lefties. - Schrandit (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Rivers of blood speech

Hi there Britannicus,

You seem to have a long history of debating with multiculturalist, I would like to have your opinion on an edit I made to Enoch Powell's Rivers of blood speech article. I removed a socialist workers reference. Reasons are on the discussion page. An editing war will ensue unless we can get a general consensus. Many thanks Alexandre8 (talk) 21:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

The KIng's Speech

Many thanks for your response. I am certainly no Stalin scholar, but I had assumed that "Marshal" was a title Stalin had kept for his glorious wartime role. I'm not sure I even noticed in the film, but had I thought about it (perhaps prompted by Axxxion), I would have expected "Comrade" or possibly "Chairman" (although it seems he was merely "Secretary" at this time). But you seem not to dispute that film characters can say whatever they like without showing any "historical inaccuracy", yes? I would very much appreciate any thoughts you may have on the other doubts that I have listed in that thread. Kind regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Whiggism

You'll see I have suggested at Talk:Whig (British political party) that we need an article on Whiggism – I wondered if you might be willing to make a start on one? Moonraker (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Adrian Hilton

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Hilton. Robofish (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited William Peryn, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Louvain and John Port (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 7th Earl of Shaftesbury, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Graham and Robert Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:92 Group#Redirect proposed

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:92 Group#Redirect proposed. – Lionel (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)– Lionel (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Norman St John-Stevas, Baron St John of Fawsley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Santa Barbara, Alan Herbert, House and Garden and Edward Pearce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter William Clayden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Unitarian and Daily News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Horner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Cockburn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Windham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Chambers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Labour Party (UK) leadership election, 2010

I am contacting you because you have participated in prior discussions at the above article, and it would be appreciated if you gave your views on an current dispute. One editor wants to add a gallery of images for people who declined to stand for the leadership. Another editor objects on the grounds that doing so puts undue weight on the people who did not participate. -Rrius (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for New Social Alliance

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Landlord and Tenant (Ireland) Act 1870

A DYK nomination for one of your articles has gotten hung up over a question that you probably can resolve. Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Landlord and Tenant (Ireland) Act 1870. Thanks!

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Cecil, 1st Viscount Cecil of Chelwood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Hugh P. Cecil, ‘Lord Robert Cecil: A Nineteenth-Century Upbringing’, ''History Today'' 25 91975), pp. 118-127.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Your edits to William Laud

Please see what I have added to Talk:William Laud on your use of the ODNB. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

William Laud appears to contain material copied from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:William Laud saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Charles Matthews (talk) 08:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Black and Tans

Hi Britannicus. You say, on reverting all my edits to the article that they are absurd - yet I note you leave parentheses around the words "pull any punches". I assume from that that you accept the quote is more of an interpretation by, presumably, a person who uses the term "pull any punches" - rather than an actual quote from any Irish document of the time. I say it is absurd for anyone to presume to quote from historical sources using a modern idiom. As for the syntactical corrections I made - I will make them again in a single edit and hope they are okay with you this time around.MarkDask 14:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Reparations in World Politics

Hi,

You mentioned on the World War I reparations talkpage recently that "Marc Trachtenberg's book Reparations in World Politics (Columbia University Press, 1980) utilised previously unavailable archives and concluded that Germany could have paid but lacked the political will to do so."

I am unable to access this source. Do you have access? If so, would you be able to provide a quote to place in the article? Regards EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Newark by-election, 2014

I haven't CSDed due to the autopatrol which suggests you are a prolific article creator, but please add some content/request deletion ASAP so that the basically empty page is not hanging around. Thanks, Matty.007 19:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Creating articles with basically no content will plausibly lead to a swift deletion. Thanks, Matty.007 19:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Newark by-election Infobox

Hi. Request you to provide your opinion regarding the inclusion of candidates in an infobox of an ongoing by-election here. Thanks. Ali Fazal (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coningsby/Archive_3&oldid=1140697785"