User talk:Clonewayx

Orphaned non-free image File:World Buddhist Scout Brotherhood.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World Buddhist Scout Brotherhood.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of N.O.H.A. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N.O.H.A. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N.O.H.A. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricochet (sport)

Hello, Clonewayx. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ricochet (sport), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Winged Blades^Godric 13:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
42	Cloob (talk)	Add sources
34	IWiW (talk)	Add sources
107	Sloped armour (talk)	Add sources
16	Sleepycat License (talk)	Add sources
6	Scouting and Guiding in Slovenia (talk)	Add sources
20	Pax Lodge (talk)	Add sources
140	Brainly (talk)	Cleanup
156	Terminal ballistics (talk)	Cleanup
115	Meerkat (app) (talk)	Cleanup
193	Yo (app) (talk)	Expand
103	Religion in Scouting (talk)	Expand
644	Yik Yak (talk)	Expand
60	AsianAve (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77	Scouting controversy and conflict (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
148	Online identity (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
65	Lifestreaming (talk)	Merge
405	Fused deposition modeling (talk)	Merge
181	Open-source software development (talk)	Merge
24	Distributed Social Networking Protocol (talk)	Wikify
29	Samsung YEPP (talk)	Wikify
6	The Buccaneer (3D printer) (talk)	Wikify
2	Youssef Khaddage (talk)	Orphan
9	Lancichinetti–Fortunato–Radicchi benchmark (talk)	Orphan
6	Sandra Duru-Eluobi (talk)	Orphan
4	Scouting and Guiding in the Cayman Islands (talk)	Stub
8	Asia Pacific Region (World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts) (talk)	Stub
7	Palestinian Scout Association (talk)	Stub
44	Micro.blog (talk)	Stub
4	Africa Region (World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts) (talk)	Stub
211	Edmodo (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of 3D printers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of 3D printers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of 3D printers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Notifying you because you made major contributions to this article. You may or may not want to weigh in. Rubdos (talk) 21:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Ricochet (sport). Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:N.O.H.A.

Hello, Clonewayx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "N.O.H.A.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]