Talk:Edmodo

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Some people think that edmodo is like facebook and in away it is it's like educational facebook

Edmodo is where you can sort of have a convo with your teachers and ask if you have homework and things like that Some times wiki is wrong bout some things. Sighned Alannah shannon fitzpatrick

Marketing article

This article reads like a marketing article.

Agreed - the likes of "but in a format that keeps the teacher firmly in control" sounds like it comes straight from their marketing dept. Good that there is an article on this software, but it should be neutral and encyclopaedic in style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neezes (talk • contribs) 08:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential risks

The article should address a range of implications.

E.g.

- surrendering control of student-related information to a commercial company

- providing student details to a commercial company

- placing learning materials in an area over which a school has no absolute control

- risks of inappropriate contact between students, or between adults and students — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.51.188.140 (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism rollback

There's been a fair bit of vandalism in this article, and ironically, cluebot actually restored some vandalism that was removed.

Based on an email sent by a reader (ticket:2018103110008962 ), I concur that rolling back to the 25 August version removes some of the vandalism. I'm mentioning this on the chance that some of the intervening edits were appropriate and would now be lost.--S Philbrick (Talk) 18:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]