User talk:Clio's Revenge

Hello, Clio's Revenge and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Carlin (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ZI Jony was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Carlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Carlin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clio's Revenge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Waguespack

The article Mike Waguespack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office

Hello, Clio's Revenge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office

Hello, Clio's Revenge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Louisiana Legislative Auditor's Office".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The West Pole, Texas

The article The West Pole, Texas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

By definition, a West Pole cannot geographically exist as the "poles" refers to the rotation of the Earth and the Earth only rotates around the North/South poles. I doubt The West Pole is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 19:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

True that it cannot geographically exist literally, but it is a notable distinction for Bee Cave, Texas. Similar to how Groundhog Day does not actually predict the weather, it is a cultural and regional distinction relevant to someone interested in the cultural attachment to "poles" in the public mind.

I understand your point, but I believe that because of the number of references to this online coupled with the fact that Texas' legislature put it in law makes it notable enough. Do you think it might do better under "state symbols of Texas?" Clio's Revenge (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The West Pole, Texas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The West Pole, Texas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The West Pole, Texas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Vincent Carlin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Joseph Vincent Carlin. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 17:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
50	Lakeway, Texas (talk)	Add sources
5	Ukarumpa International School (talk)	Add sources
47	Church of Saint George, Sofia (talk)	Add sources
244	Zaporozhian Sich (talk)	Add sources
15	Karoline Pershell (talk)	Add sources
47	Zero Tolerance (video game) (talk)	Add sources
108	Hossein Amir-Abdollahian (talk)	Cleanup
21	Negotiations leading to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (talk)	Cleanup
194	Interstate 45 (talk)	Cleanup
142	History of Louisiana (talk)	Expand
10	Timeline of Baton Rouge, Louisiana (talk)	Expand
225	Huy Fong Foods (talk)	Expand
64	United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
94	William Weatherford (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5	Gömör County (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,247	United States involvement in regime change (talk)	Merge
85	Advertising network (talk)	Merge
587	2023 Badminton Asia Championships – Women's doubles (talk)	Merge
19	Westpark Tollway (talk)	Wikify
8	Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector (talk)	Wikify
240	Architecture of cathedrals and great churches (talk)	Wikify
14	Auditing in India (talk)	Orphan
6	Terme della Rotonda (Catania) (talk)	Orphan
2	Bookjam (talk)	Orphan
4	Stephanie Barnard (talk)	Stub
5	Nitrianska Blatnica (talk)	Stub
3	Szalonna (village) (talk)	Stub
10	Abbas Araghchi (talk)	Stub
27	Organized Crime Control Act (talk)	Stub
2	Šivetice (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Vincent Carlin (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems to be a work entirely of original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Vincent Carlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 14:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 19:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Vincent Carlin

Hello, Clio's Revenge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Vincent Carlin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board

Hello, Clio's Revenge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Vincent Carlin

Hello, Clio's Revenge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joseph Vincent Carlin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zack Rosenburg

Hello, Clio's Revenge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zack Rosenburg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zack Rosenburg

Hello, Clio's Revenge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zack Rosenburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]