Jump to content

User talk:Cliff12345/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cliff12345! Thank you for your contributions. I am TowTrucker and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TowTrucker (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


Thanks for the friendly welcome, I'll definitely have a look at those links. Cliff12345 (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing

Hi Cliff12345. Please do not upload chemical structures as .jpg. Thank you. --Leyo 07:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll try to fix this now. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Right, I've added the same file as png (the link says that png is fine). Cliff12345 (talk) 11:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for File:Ethylene propylene rubber.png. Unfortunately, it shows the same compression artifacts, because you probably started from the JPG file. If you haven't saved the structure in another file type, you need to restart from the scratch, unfortunately. --Leyo 12:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
I will look into this when I have more spare time to get a new one; in the meantime should I keep the (reasonably clear) image in Ethylene propylene rubber or should I remove it? Cliff12345 (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
We can keep it for a few days. --Leyo 13:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Right, I have replaced the old image with an svg, so I will request a delete for the old jpeg and png files. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. You have a steep learning curve. Keep up the good work. :-) --Leyo 14:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumho Polychem

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kumho Polychem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lakokat 13:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on Talk:Kumho Polychem (I am not quite sure if the article is important enough, but it certainly seems so given that other subsidiaries of the same company have their own articles). Cliff12345 (talk) 13:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Polimeri Europa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Polimeri Europa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on Talk:Polimeri Europa. Cliff12345 (talk) 13:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tear resistance

The article Tear resistance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, circular argument.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Compression Set A Diagram.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Compression Set A Diagram.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_June_15#File:Compression_Set_A_Diagram.gif Cliff12345 (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Compression Set B Diagram.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Compression Set B Diagram.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_June_15#File:Compression_Set_B_Diagram.gif Cliff12345 (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Cliff, if you created these two images, could you please add a self-created license tag to them? If you didn't, they are borderline, and as such will probably be deleted per commons:COM:PCP (a principle which Wikipedia shares with Commons). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
These images are not mine, however, I am happy to make a diagram of my own. Cliff12345 (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Glass Run Channel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Glass Run Channel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Glass_Run_Channel.jpg, I have added this box explaining why we should keep the image in accordance with Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. If there is no objection within a couple of days I will remove the original deletion tag. Cliff12345 (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I misunderstood Wikipedia's non-free fair use policy. Cliff12345 (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hluleka Nature Reserve Beach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hluleka Nature Reserve Beach.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

See File talk:Hluleka Nature Reserve Beach.jpg

In response to your feedback

Thanks for your contributions.

SwisterTwister talk 18:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

 

File:Glass Run Channel.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glass Run Channel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I misunderstood Wikipedia's non-free fair use policy. Cliff12345 (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Subsistence crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

You POV tag

Hi, you tagged Muhammad's first revelation with POV. Please state your criticism in the article talk page, so that it can be addressed. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

British Mathematical Olympiad Subtrust

Hello, Cliff12345, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on British Mathematical Olympiad Subtrust, appears to be directly copied from http://www.bmoc.maths.org/home/history.shtml. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on British Mathematical Olympiad Subtrust if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Alpha Centauri Edit

Alpha Centauri Bb is an interesting discovery, but there is no need to try to hype it more by trying to give undue weight to the possibility that some utterly speculative form of chemistry, as yet unknown to science could produce life there. There is no evidence for any life that does not require liquid water. This cannot exist at 1500 K as it is above the critical point at 647 K. While alternate chemistry for life has been proposed, these are highly speculative and to my knowledge none have been proposed that would work on a planet with conditions similar to Alf Cen Bb. To the best of our knowledge there is no teapot orbiting the Sun between the orbits of Earth and Mars, though we cannot be entirely sure - the very small possibility that there is one does not warrant saying there is "probably" no teapot between the Earth and Mars in the article on the Solar System. Similarly, the article on the planet Mercury does not feel the need to state it is "probably" unsuitable for life. 46.126.76.193 (talk) 23:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Master of the Skies: The Red Ace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pilots and Storyline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

WP:Reliable source

In our discussion about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomono clan, I wonder if I understand your point of view well enough? In the same way that we do not accept ja:Wikipedia as a reliable source, I think we cannot credit Samurai-Archives.com as valid without something more. Is this not the current consensus opinion? --Ansei (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

See the deletion talk page. Cliff12345 (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Your diff helped to sharpen the issues. --Ansei (talk) 18:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Awan (tribe) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to PPCoin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Fixed Cliff12345 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Digital currency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to DNS
Ripple (monetary system) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bonds

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Digital_currency and safety

Use the talk page. Explain why an Internet forum is not a reliable source in this case (the source is the Bitcoin lead developer, not a random person). Don't remove such a section without discussing it first. To not have it is a major disservice to all Wikipedia users. (PS, I won't be watching this page, if you want to discuss it, let's do it at the talk page for the article. Where everyone can participate.) **** you, you ******* ****. (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spring supply, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Apostrophe

One of your recent edits to Digital currency added the following text (emphasis mine):

Currently a closed source, centralized exchange system, though it's developers claim this will change.

I'll be blunt here: please don't ever do that again. While I'm almost okay with the comma splice in the hatnote you added, the apostrophe you added to its made me literally cringe. Literally.

Thank you.  — TORTOISEWRATH 23:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about my mistake. I'll try to be more careful in future. Cliff12345 (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

G-Cloud

Just wanted to say thanks for edits and interest you've shown in the G-Cloud page that I put together. Much appreciated. -- User:Davestow —Preceding undated comment added 12:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem, welcome to Wikipedia by the way :) Cliff12345 (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cryptocurrency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Developer
Harpic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tom Reynolds

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Fixed (but the Tom Reynolds link needs to be more specific). Cliff12345 (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

WP:MOS

See WP:MOS. The top of the article isn't for core content. It's supposed to be a summary. Additionally, since cryptocurrency is a type of digital currency, it is reasonable to include a summary of that article within it. This isn't unnecessary duplication but something that makes things easier for the reader. It's not about the content. It's about how the content serves the reader. --KyleLandas (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough, I mainly made my edit as it seemed like the cryptocurrency section was a copy and paste of the start of the original article. Having thought about it, I suppose it makes sense to have some sort of summary, (even if it's identical to content on another page) as having to visit a different page to get an overview would be an inconvenience. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cryptocurrency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DNS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Cliff12345 (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Optical computing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Cliff12345 (talk) 13:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Namecoin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anonymous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Cliff12345 (talk) 22:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Proof-of-stake

The article Proof-of-stake has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. X-Fi6 (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kinetic Void, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Cliff12345 (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop it.

You are a scoundrel and a liar. Do not make a mockery of me, oh 'Advanced Mathematician'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.249.248.135 (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Bitcoin history

There's a discussion underway at the Bitcoin talk page about creating a new article about the history of Bitcoin. You may be interested to help with this effort, so please take a look! Fleetham (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll have a look now. Cliff12345 (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Bitcion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bitcion. Since you had some involvement with the Bitcion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cryptocurrencies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cryptocurrencies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cryptocurrencies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [citation needed] 01:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Compression Set B Diagram.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of BitTorrent clients, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page P2P. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Much Wenlock Guildhall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Much Wenlock Guildhall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ollieinc (talk) 05:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cliff12345/Archive_1&oldid=1076864113"