User talk:Clef le Tete

This is Clef le Tete's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; draft needs to cite in-depth, third-party sources indicating that the subject meets WP:AUTHOR. The MTV claim is promising, if it can be backed with a citation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Damian Corless, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clef le Tete! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Damian Corless concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Damian Corless, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Damian Corless

Hello, Clef le Tete. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Damian Corless".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rollidan were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources do not show that this person passes WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Damian Corless, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rollidan (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rollidan,

I resubmitted yesterday draft entry on writer Damian Corless but have since found more sources. However when I attempted to submit these additional independent sources I was told the draft is under consideration and I was unable to submit the additional supporting material. Please bear in mind that some profiles, interviews and reviews predate the widespread reach of the internet and are therefore not available/difficult to track.

Kind regards,

Clef 2A02:8084:E81:3600:A51A:8882:DAAD:69FA (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Damian Corless

Hello, Clef le Tete,

Thank you for creating Damian Corless.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

As a biography of a living person, this article needs further citations (for example, about him being editor of Magill, producer of Rising Time, scriptwriter on 'Don't Quote Me'. His career should be described in chronological order. Notability requires substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources (see WP:RS) - and if there are online sources, inclusion of weblinks in the inline citations helps other users to verify them.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Corless moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Damian Corless, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul,

All of the information contained in the entry for Damian Corless are accurate. Damian is now in his 60s and many citations predate the digital age. For instance, his role as producer of RTE Radio 1's breakfast show Riaing Time, his role as editor of Magill and other posts. His role as scriptwriter on Don't Quote Me was uncredited but very much real. Whoever edited the entry got the opening facts wrong from the information provided. Also excluded was that Corless was the No1 best selling author of singer Christy Dignam's 'Crazy World' confession in 2019. His next book, 'The Birth Of Hip Hibernia' is now being made into an RTE tv documentary series Hip Hibernia to be broadcast in 2023. Please restore the Wikipedia page pending your suggested amendments. 2A02:8084:E81:3600:7DE1:898D:5F79:20C7 (talk) 18:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some promotional fluff/peacock wording that has to be fixed, and the text needs to be structured in paragraphs. The references also need work. See WP:CITEREF. In addition please remove all refs that don't serve to verify the information or are not reliable and independent, such as "IMDB".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Damian Corless has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Damian Corless. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 07:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea,

The article Damian Corless was published on Wikipedia and then removed. When I asked why I was told it was the vexatious action of a person who had no accreditation as a Wikipedia editor, and that that person had been barred. In that light, can I ask for your help on a couple of specifics to get this over the line. Firstly, every reference has been exhaustively checked by myself as independent, reliable, published sources. As the writing career of Corless stretches back to the early 1980s, not all are online, but they are readily available in libraries, newspaper and broadcast archives. You suggest that IMBD is not reliable and independent, so should I include it as an External Link? What is the status of the online British Comedy Guide as a reliable, independent source?

I will resubmit having removed every trace of peacock terms. And finally, where do I go to find out how to format paragraphs on Wikipedia?

I thank you in advance for your help.

Clef Clef le Tete (talk) 10:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Asilvering, I have re-read Wikipedia's instructions on citing reliable sources and I fail to see why my entry has been rejected on these grounds. Every source cited is reliable and verifiable. Corless has been writing professionally for 40 years so some of the sources quoted are not online but anything not online can be readlily accessed in the National Library of Ireland or the National Newspaper Library on Dublin's Pearse Street. The entry for Damian Corless was initially published by Wikipedia before it was pulled. When I inquired I was told the individual who pulled it had no authority to do so and that it was a vexatious action. I would ask you to reconsider your decision to reject this thoroughly researched and referenced entry. At the very least can you specify which references you have a problem with so that I can amend to your satisfaction. Clef Clef le Tete (talk) 09:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has my amended article been received?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hi there. I have resubmitted an entry on the Irish writer Damian Corless with the amendments suggested by the Wikipedia editor. The trouble is, I'm not sure if the amended article has either been sent or received because there was no Send/Submit option at the bottom of the piece.The View History section has it listed, but I'm still unsure if it has been sent and received. Can someone please enlighten me as to whether the amended piece is in the right place for reconsideration? With thanks,Clef le Tete. Clef le Tete (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to click the "resubmit" blue box in the most recent decline message. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I've just spotted an editor's note I missed saying 'tone' on my entry for the writer Damian Corless.

If I change the 'tone' of the sentence can I resubmit, even though it's only an hour since I resubmitted what I believed to be the fully amended version?

Thanks for your patience.

Clef Clef le Tete (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that!

Clef Clef le Tete (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To establish notability, sources more sources that meet wikipedia's WP:GNG policy are required. Sources need to be independent of the subject and contain significant coverage rather than a trivial mention.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––– GMH MELBOURNE 23:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Damian Corless has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Damian Corless. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damian Corless (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per previous reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damian Corless and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]