User talk:Clbristow

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert O'Neil Bristow (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Clbristow, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Clbristow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert O'Neil Bristow (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 00:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 05:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jimmy,

I have a question at the end of this message. Regarding the use of the terms "black," "Black American," or African-American," I used the Bloomberg style guide "African American or black" which is summarized below,

"'An African American', or 'a black'? By DYLAN BYERS 04/03/13 11:52 AM EDT This passage from a recent Bloomberg News article caught the attention of one loyal reader, who said it read to him "like nails on a chalkboard":

For a White House stung by criticism that it lacks racial diversity, McGuire would allow Obama to recruit a black to represent the administration on economic matters while also complimenting Lew, who has spent most of his career in government service in Washington, said the person. "Black" is common as an adjective — "the first black president" — but as a noun, it is more common to use "an African-American." However, it appears that "a black" is not only approved by the Bloomberg style guide, but required.

"We say that someone is black rather than African-American," the Bloomberg style guide reads. "Ethnic descriptions used in hyphenation with ”American” are best reserved for immigrants or first-generation Americans."

"President Barack Obama’s father was from Kenya and his mother was from Kansas, so it’s precise to say Obama is African-American. Arnold Schwarzenegger is an Austrian-American because he emigrated from Austria. Henry Kissinger, born in Bavaria, is German-American," the guide continues. "We don’t say former President George W. Bush is German-American or Irish-American, although he has German and Irish ancestors, because he is generations removed from those forebears."

So, by the logic of Bloomberg LP, Obama is "an African-American," but first lady Michelle Obama is "a black."

(The AP Stylebook similarly approves use of the word "black" but also approves use of the word "African-American" — though it notes that the terms "are not necessarily interchangeable.")

We've reached out to Bloomberg News for comment, but have yet to hear back. We've also reached out to the National Association of Black Journalists for their thoughts on the matter, and will provide updates here as we get them. Readers thoughts are also welcome.

UPDATE (12:07 p.m.): Richard Prince of the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education flags this post on the issue from March 7:

A style guide from the National Association of Black Journalists says, "In news copy, aim to use black as an adjective, not a noun. Also, when describing a group, use black people instead of just blacks. In headlines, blacks, however, is acceptable." At the [New York] Times, "We don't have a guideline one way or the other on noun versus adjective," spokeswoman Eileen Murphy told Journal-isms.... At the Associated Press, "The AP Stylebook entries on 'African-American' and 'black' permit noun usages of black," spokesman Jack Stokes said. "The individual's preference is always a factor." However, at The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times, style books prefer that "black" remain an adjective... The Post guide says, "African American, when appropriate, is preferable to black in the noun form: An African American and African Americans read much better than A black and blacks.""

Question: I will change the noun "black" to "Black American" as requested. Should I also change the term "white" to "White American?"

Thank you. Clbristow (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert O'Neil Bristow. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Spectacular! Thank you for all your efforts. Clbristow (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert O'Neil Bristow has been accepted

Robert O'Neil Bristow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jimmy, It seems something has happened, and this page is no longer searchable in Wikipedia. What should I do? Thanks very much. Clbristow (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Rhea, B.J. and Abels, D. (2020). I'm Not at Liberty to Say. Bellagio Press, Tega Cay, SC.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Rhea, B.J. and Abels, D. (2020). I'm Not at Liberty to Say. Bellagio Press, Tega Cay, SC., was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)