User talk:Classic Buck$

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Classic Buck$. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. shoy (reactions) 21:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 22:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that A) Your userpage is not an article, therefore you cannot link actual articles to it, and B) Your userpage is not appropriate as a userpage or an article. For both it is overly promotional and biased, and it would not be suitable as an article as it contains no reliable third party sources to demonstrate notability--Jac16888 ^Talk 22:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was just notified that over the past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just didn't put in the selfie Copyright tag Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Buck$ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Classic Buck$, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JSFarman (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I made a mistake by uploading to many Classic Buck$ pages and also there is no legal action intended to be taken. I just understood exactly what I was doing wrong and I have it ready for another shot at creating the best article for me. I left the link to discog or you can just check the album itself to see I'm the produce of Lean wit it,Rock wit it and I just want the notoriety for my work on wiki. Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Author.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Author.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Classic.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Classic.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just have to put in the selfie Copyright hashtag Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic Buck$

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Classic Buck$, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 08:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Classic Buck$. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 08:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Classic Buck$, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ClassicBucks (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 09:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classic Buck$ (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabayi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft has no reliable, verifiable, independent sources to corroborate any of the claims made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classic Buck$ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Classic Buck$, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabayi (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was just notified that over the past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lean wit It, Rock wit It, you may be blocked from editing. There are no sources to support any of your vanity claims to be associated with this record. Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Classic Buck$

The article Classic Buck$ has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cabayi (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Classic Buck$

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Classic Buck$, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Cabayi (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ClassicBucks, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 09:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi

You have blocked me and it states in you guideline: Rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. Blocking for legal threats is generally not such an urgent need that it must be done before determining whether an ambiguous statement was genuinely a threat of legal action Classic Buck$ (talk) 10:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing ambiguous about your threat. Cabayi (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say legal action WOULD be taken I said BEFORE so you should have seen what it was in reference to.

I was just notified that over the past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I said BEFORE legal action is taken and that's not a threat.

Over the past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 10:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BEFORE legal action is taken is not a threat.

Over the past decade wiki have been a problem with my producer credit for lean wit it, Rock wit it and I was blocked after the update. Maurice Gleaton aka Parlay is not the only producer of this composition as I have tried to explain. Robert "Buck" Hill aka Classic Buck$ is also a producer of this track and that is well known by ASCAP, EMI, SO SO DEF, AND MORE. You didn't look into what I meant by what I said so please click the link to see the album credits for yourself because like I was saying my first album was not recognized because of this and Universal Records will be reaching out if it's not corrected. https://www.discogs.com/Dem-Franchize-Boyz-Feat-Lil-Peanut-And-Charlay-Lean-Wit-It-Rock-Wit-It/release/3570720 Classic Buck$ (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Explain

Explain Classic Buck$ (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please

Hello I made a mistake by uploading to many Classic Buck$ pages and also there is no legal action intended to be taken. I just understood exactly what I was doing wrong and I have it ready for another shot at creating the best article for me. I left the link to discog or you can just check the album itself to see I'm the produce of Lean wit it,Rock wit it and I just want the notoriety for my work on wiki. Classic Buck$ (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Vanjagenije (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been identified as a WP:sockpuppet of user ClassicBucks. Since you were using this page inappropriately, I have revoked your talk page access. If you want to appeal the blocked, log in to your original account (User:ClassicBucks) and make an WP:unblock request (read WP:GAB first). Vanjagenije (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]