Jump to content

User talk:Chewings72/Archive 25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 29

Wikidata weekly summary #414

16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism from IP 100.0.32.217

Chewings72, I just wanted to bring to your attention that the edits you reverted from IP 100.0.32.217 are not the only acts of vandalism coming from this user. If you take a look at the filter log you'll see that back in October this user was also warned and disallowed because of edits made in a similar pattern to the ones today. It appears that the same person is behind the vandalism in both 2019 and 2020. I recommend that some kind of restriction is placed on this IP. Cordially, History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 21:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

P.S. And congratulations on just reaching Veteran Editor IV (or Tutnum of the Encyclopedia), well done and keep going! — Preceding unsigned comment added by History DMZ (talkcontribs) 21:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

History DMZ, Thank you for the congratulations.:) It would seem that IP 100.0.32.217 has only struck twice in two years and may disappear again. Given it's an ISP, it is not clear if the vandalism is by the same individual on the two occassions. So unless I have missed other examples of that individual's inappropriate contributions, a watching brief seems in order. Regards Chewings72 (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Chewings72, No problem, I trust your judgement. I just hope this IP user stops the vandalizing before a less forgiving patroller blocks him. Cordially, History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 07:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit to Geoffrey Chaucer

I was going to approve this edit, but I see that you reverted the previous attempt to apply it. It looks OK to me. What am I missing? Respectfully -- WikiPedant (talk) 22:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiPedant Thank you for your message. User:178.120.20.150 was being a pain in changing to in numerous articles when, as I understand it, both really are interchangeable. So my rollback was not really a big issue. Rather I was following in the footsteps of other editors who were doing the same revert. I note that User:178.120.20.150 has been subject of more serious issues regarding some later edits to Yoko Ono (see the ISP user's talk page). Regards Chewings72 (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Right, so I see. A busy IP accomplishing nothing constructive. He probably has a date with destiny. -- WikiPedant (talk) 07:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #415

20:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #416

17:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

14:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #417

Hey, Chewings! You didn't give any reason in the edit summary for reverting the newb editor's edit, which seemed like a good-faith edit to me? —valereee (talk) 11:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

valereee Moshtrofontz Fair point. I have made amends by placing the correct link into the article as was intended by Moshtrofontz. Chewings72 (talk) 12:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you!  :) —valereee (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

Wikidata weekly summary #418

22:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Actium

Lots of sources including very reliable ones such as the Brittanica encyclopaedia agree.Also where is your source for the figures saying 140 ships for Antony and 250 for Octavian.No source I have seen says that. Epicc1235647 (talk) 13:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Epicc1235647 I am not in a position to comment on ship numbers and I did not mean to delete those changes to ship numbers you put in. Other editors have placed the previous numbers in the text and you have provided various references to support your revised numbers. All I am asking is that you provide a reliable source for your previous addition stating that this was the largest naval battle in history in terms of ships involved. If this statement comes from the Britannica Encyclopaedia, then properly refer to it as part of your changes to the text. Thanks Chewings72 (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh sorry for the misunderstanding Epicc1235647 (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Epicc1235647 That's fine. All the best with your Wikipedia editing.  :) Chewings72 (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Al-Taftazani

As salamu alaykum. I see you reverted an edit without cause or evidence despite sources being given. Could you avoid an edit war and explain why you did this? User:69.144.111.231

No there is nothing about a youtube video which goes against Wiki standards in and of itself. The video is a speech from a well known academic and authority on the subject, from a collegiate level lecture on the subject. Youtube is a video sharing format, which content depending on the veracity of the poster, to dismiss all youtube is the same as dismissing all wikipedia, which many people do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2020. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in UTC.

Current events

Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16 June. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

June Blitz: This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of articles tagged for copyedit in May 2020 and requests.

Drive and blitz reports

March Drive: Self-isolation from coronavirus may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a record low of 118 articles, a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

April Blitz: This blitz ran from 12 to 18 April with a theme of Indian military history. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

May Drive: This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history! Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

Progress report: as of 2 June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1 January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020.

Outreach: To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, The Signpost contributor and GOCE participant Puddleglum2.0 interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's April WikiProject Report. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in The Signpost's May News and Notes page.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Wikidata weekly summary #419

21:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

  • Library Card Platform
  • New partnerships
    • ProQuest
    • Springer Nature
    • BioOne
    • CEEOL
    • IWA Publishing
    • ICE Publishing
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #420

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Mockup of the new reply feature, showing new editing tools
The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

21:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #421