User talk:Charmanderpants

Your submission at Articles for creation: Community Union Defence League has been accepted

Community Union Defence League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Peoples Union (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Peoples Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Charmanderpants! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Peoples Union has been accepted

Black Peoples Union, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 14:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I've just checked, the citation I added was not archived, so it may have looked improperly sourced. I've created an archive link for the article which should now make the remaining sections visible. Thank you. Charmanderpants (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The material that you are adding is a WP:BLP violation. Particularly the framing of Jolly denying allegations. What allegations? Unless the allegations can be specified and sourced from a reliable source any content about them is WP:UNDUE. The second part of the stuff what you were adding (the election after party) wasn't even supported by the source. In that part you wrote that Jolly denied allegations. The source didn't state that Jonny denied any allegations. It also did not specify what any allegations were against him. If you want that material included please start a discussion at Talk:Stephen Jolly. If you don't obtain consensus you will be reverted per WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:ONUS. TarnishedPath^talk 00:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I will take this to the articles talk page. Charmanderpants (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Always a good idea to see what other editors think when it comes to a content dispute. TarnishedPath^talk 04:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:BLP/N

I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:BLP/N#Talk:Stephen Jolly asking for broader community input on whether the "serious allegations" should be covered in the article Stephen Jolly. TarnishedPath^talk 11:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)