Talk:Community Union Defence League

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 October 2021 by reviewer Devonian Wombat (talk · contribs).

Australia

	Australia portal Community Union Defence League is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Propose to merge into Australian Communist Party

I propose merging Community Union Defence League into Australian Communist Party. CUDL is led by the party and there is very little information about CUDL on the page to warrant its own article. AndreyKva (talk) 04:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After looking through the article for the ACP, I believe that, since the ACP article relies more on primary sources, it is therefore less notable. I believe the CUDL article should be kept and revised and the ACP article should be deleted. AndreyKva (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]