User talk:CharliTa

A tag has been placed on Dee (Bratz character), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jeodesic 12:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChelseaKorka.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:ChelseaKorka.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChelseaKorka2.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:ChelseaKorka2.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 21:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Korka

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Chelsea Korka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 23:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Korka

Please be aware that you may not remove the AFD template from the Chelsea Korka article. If you believe that the article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for living people, please register your support at the relevant article for deletion page. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 10:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Please stop reverting my edits on the Chelsea Korka page. This is a warning that if you do this again I will report you for violating Wikipedia's three revert rule, and you may be blocked from editing. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting libellous/unsourced/derogatory material is a exception to the 3RR rule. I again ask you to read the relevant policies, as I highlighted to you on the article talk page. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 01:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CharliTa. Some of your edits do indeed violate WP:BLP. That is why I locked the Korka page. I did not block you, since you are new and may not understand the policy. Please do not insert unsourced things about how Nitollano is in a relationship and had a child out of wedlock. These violate WP:BLP. If you persist, I will block you. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AsiaN..jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AsiaN..jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 01:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Erissymbol.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Erissymbolin.png. The copy called Image:Erissymbolin.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Miss America (DC Comics) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re molecular transmutation

Please see my reply at the Silver Surfer talk page. You may want to check out nuclear transmutation which is an actual physical process that occurs within the sun. Keep contributing to wikipedia but please do not vandalise any articles. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a message on my talk page and I would be glad to help. Zuracech lordum 15:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joseph James

I've nominated Joseph James, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Joseph James satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph James and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Joseph James during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Molecular immobilization, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 17:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Candice Michelle. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. - Deep Shadow 12:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Q. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anomie 22:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Michelle McCool, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla 15:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph James (wrestler)

Your article on Joseph James (wrestler) has been deleted as it did not meet the criteria outlined in WP:BIO. --Yamla 15:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph James (wrestler)

A tag has been placed on Joseph James (wrestler), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 15:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:MickieJamesGroovy.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MickieJamesGroovy.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MickieJamesGroovy.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:MickieJamesGroovy.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hanging_figure-four_necklockcandice.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hanging_figure-four_necklockcandice.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 15:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hanging_figure-four_necklockcandice.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hanging_figure-four_necklockcandice.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hanging figure-four necklockcandice.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hanging figure-four necklockcandice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Pewterschmidt family (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Pewterschmidt family, you will be blocked from editing. Sala Skan 12:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia by blanking pages as you did on this page[1]. Blanking pages can be harmful to Wikipedia because it has a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Ono 17:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leilene Ondrade

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Leilene Ondrade. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gamer83 18:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. If you change the billed from to Green Bay again you will be in violation of 3RR. I suggest you talk it out before trying to add it in. Darrenhusted 12:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Torrie Wilson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. --Yamla 19:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the WWE Diva Search article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla 19:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Please refrain from threats and personal attacks such as this one. See WP:NPA. Also, note that you are not able to block users as you are not an administrator. --Yamla 19:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MickieGroovy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MickieGroovy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MickieGroovy.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:MickieGroovy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 19:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Kristal Marshall. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla 19:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Crawford

Me getting blocked because I frame you? You can't do that. Please, you can't write an article, Victoria's has run-on sentences and there isn't enough information. That's why they haven't create a page for her, because their isn't enought information that we can put in the article, by the looks of it you have alot of complains. You should never write an article that's deletion, that will block you indefinetly, anyways I am going to nominate Victoria for deletion. Also the info box, she isn't an actor, she is a wrestler, you need a infobox for a wrestler.

Art 281 19:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dachshund lover--.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dachshund lover--.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dachshund lover--.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Dachshund lover--.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 19:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were found to be an abusive sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Kari2MuchFan (talk · contribs). As such, this account has been blocked indefinitely and the six month block on that account has been reset. --Yamla 20:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]