User talk:Kari2MuchFan

It is suspected or confirmed that this user has used one or more sock puppets for abuse, libel, or block/ban evasion.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sock puppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sock puppets to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset and may further lengthen it.

You have recently re-created the article Kari Schmidt, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Xtifr _tälk 23:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:612798558 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:612798558 l.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:612798558 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:612798558 l.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:180px-Kari1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Kari1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:180px-Kari1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Kari1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Deep South Wrestling, LLC roster

Your recent edit to Deep South Wrestling, LLC roster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Weregerbil 17:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating Simona Fusco

From the article talk page: It is the repost of an article deleted via Articles for Deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simona Fusco. If you disagree with an article's deletion, you may request a deletion review. A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 18:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Deletion review/Discussions for an explanation of how to request a deletion review. A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for your vandalism and general attempts to reduce the quality of the Wikipedia. Please take this time to consider whether you want to start contributing productively to the Wikipedia. If you decide you do, you are welcome to resume editing once the block expires. --Yamla 22:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Castro

Please let the community decide whether David Castro should stay on the encyclopedia. Otherwise I will have to send it over to WP:AFD Sparsefarce 21:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I didn't notice that you added a filmography. Sorry Sparsefarce 21:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Brookeadams.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brookeadams.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BrookeAdamsDiva1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrookeAdamsDiva1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BrookeAdamsDiva1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrookeAdamsDiva1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BrookeAdamsDiva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrookeAdamsDiva.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrookeAdamsDiva.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BrookeAdamsDiva.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for your continued violation of Wikipedia image copyright and fair-use policies. --Yamla 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Weber

please stop changing "She would leave WWE in February 2005." to "She quit WWE in February Of 2005." why over link WWE esspecially as your not even bothering to correctly link past the dab, also for obvious gammatical reason the current text is fine. --- Paulley

no, because didn't already "quit", it says she would leave in 2005, it's like your talking in the future. She Quit! she didn't leave! Kari2MuchFan 16:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Kari2MuchFan[reply]

That's not the part i am questioning... if you had just changed "would leave" to "quit" i wouldnt have said anything... anyway if i was talking into the future it would be "will leave" not "would leave". Also dont leave personal attacks on my userpages it's not polite. --- Paulley

sorry, hehehe Kari2MuchFan 18:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Kari2MuchFan[reply]

Joseph Karakasians

The article Joseph Karakasians has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 17:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Just a friendly warning. You are in danger of violating WP:3RR on Brooke Adams (model). You have not violated it yet but I am leaving this note in case you are unaware of Wikipedia's policy on reverts. --Yamla 18:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly warning. You are in danger of violating WP:3RR on Brooke Adams (model). You have not violated it yet but I am leaving this note in case you are unaware of Wikipedia's policy on reverts. Kari2MuchFan 11:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Kari2MuchFan[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for this edit where you change cited information so it no longer matches the citation. Please remember that while blocked, you are not permitted to edit the Wikipedia from any other account or IP address as per WP:SOCK. --Yamla 21:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your block timer has been reset due to your continued blanking of this page. Your one-week block starts from now. --Yamla 20:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended. Please use this time to consider whether you wish to contribute productively to the Wikipedia. This page has been protected until your block has expired. --Yamla 22:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were caught editing from an IP address to avoid the block placed on this account. Your block has been extended to six months as a result. You are not permitted to edit the Wikipedia during this time. --Yamla 16:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block timer reset, user caught avoiding block once again. --Yamla 20:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been protected for one week due to your abusive blanking of the block information. --Yamla 13:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]