User talk:Ceranthor/Archive 16

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ceranthor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

→

TFA

Ceranthor, could you please finish up the blurb at Wikipedia:TFA/R#November_9? See the Suggested formatting section at the top of WP:TFA/R, and be sure to add alt text. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Ramapo Fault

On October 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ramapo Fault, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

JamieS93 07:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		To Ceranthor, for graciously volunteering to modify his Today's Featured Article request to accomodate another article with fewer points. Your generosity is much appreciated. Karanacs (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Honestly, I can't complain. I get to have my article on the mainpage and have lots of Americans see it... that's awesome, either way! Thanks. ceranthor 19:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

A DYK?

Cool. Thanks for the tip-o-the-hat! Lithium6ion (talk) 15:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

You deserve it. You did just as much work as I did, if not more. ceranthor 15:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXXVI

WikiCup Awards

		The 2009 WikiCup Participant Award
		This WikiCup Award is presented to Ceranthor for their participation in the 2009 WikiCup. Your contributions along the way have greatly improved the quality of many articles, pictures, and sounds on the English Wikipedia.

Congratulations! Hope to see you sign up for the 2010 WikiCup, here, if you haven't already! iMatthew ^talk at 22:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry!

I apologise for the accidental revert and warning. I went to revert it, but had already beaten me a couple seconds earlier, so I accidentally reverted you instead. Very sorry. --Meaghan ^{guess who :)} 19:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Um, no big deal. :) ceranthor 19:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding a SSP case that you closed

This one. I believe reported it in the wrong order, i.e. what I had listed as a suspected sock (the one you looked at and closed the case with) is the old blocked user. The current sock isn't blocked at all. Can you have a look, or possibly reopen the case again so I can change it? Thanks. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 21:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

You can just re-open the case. No big deal, it's my fault too. :) ceranthor 02:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

TFA, nice

Congrats on the TFA! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. If you're interested, there was a whole little fiasco over it. I gave the spot to Inner German Border, then someone wanted to move my article to the 10th, but another article was already there... *wipes brow* ;) ceranthor 02:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Henry Allingham World War I contest

Hi, I've noticed that you decided to join the contest and create a submission page. First of all I'd like to thank you for this and invite you to pick up a flag and add your name here. Secondly, I wish to announce you that there is a possibility due to internal organization problems, that the contest would be postponed by 4-5 days. Thanks and best regards, --Eurocopter (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Reply

I enabled it temporarily for you. --Meaghan ^{guess who :)} 13:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Main page day

Have fun! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I've endured it before. Wish I got this earlier! Hopes IGb does well. ;) ceranthor 23:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sheesh, I wasn't thinking! I was still the thinking you were on the tenth when I posted the Dispatch; I missed that one! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Upper and Lower Table Rock

Thanks for your suggestions and support for Upper and Lower Table Rock... it was promoted today!. Little Mountain 5 02:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

I saw that - congrats! ceranthor 02:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Re FAC copyedit

Happy to help, though it may be a day or so before I have the time to do anything. I realise there's a time factor involved, so I'll do my best :) EyeSerene^talk 11:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, done. Hope it helps. EyeSerene^talk 12:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries, you're welcome. I've got the FAC watchlisted; hopefully it'll go smoothly :) EyeSerene^talk 13:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Dan Povenmire

Hi, Ceranthor; can you please check out the FAC on the article and weigh in on the ongoing comments on sourcing? SandyGeorgia has requested the supported reviewers comment on the discussion. Thanks, The Flash ^{talk} 22:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, would you mind going back and supporting/commenting an second time? The entire FAC was restarted in order to clear some space at the FAC hub, which means any and all comments beforehand don't count. Thanks, The Flash ^{talk} 22:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, do you know if you can do that review? You mentioned last month that you would, but so far nothing. Thanks, The Flash ^{talk} 23:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk:1989 Loma Prieta earthquake/GA1

Hey. In case you forgot, this should be wrapped up soon. Wizardman 19:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Quick advice on GA

I saw you on the list of GA mentors and was hoping you might answer a quick question.

Another user and I have each submitted articles for GA related to histories of particular communities in Texas. Lacking a particularly good place to put them we put them in the "World History" topic. I notice, though, that it appears (to me) reviewers are deliberately skipping the articles seeming to pick instead articles related to histories of older civilizations (I know there is a backlog but it is frustrating to see articles processed out of order).

Question: Are we placing our articles in the wrong bin? Should we be placing these history articles in the Geography bin instead?

Thanks.

--Mcorazao (talk) 04:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied to on your talk page. ceranthor 01:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Mcorazao. Sorry for the belated response, I've been exceptionally busy. Both of the articles you nominated and the DYK you nom'd look great. I understand it's frustrating that your articles aren't getting reviewed - but that's the fatal flaw with GAN. If you'd like me to review one, I'd be sure to. Perhaps you can ask another reviewer to review the other article you nominated, as well. Your "friend" as you called them should also do this. Karanacs is an outstanding reviewer who writes Texas history articles, she should be able to be extremely helpful too. Hope this helps! ceranthor 01:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Certainly I am not looking for any special treatment. If you would like to review one of the articles I would much appreciate it. I have previously gotten help from Karanacs on Free State of Galveston and other stuff, and I have not really had an opportunity to return the favor. So I don't want to abuse her generous nature by asking for more favors so soon.

--Mcorazao (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Fribbulus Xax's RfA

Thanks, Ceranthor, for supporting me in my RFA. It passed unanimously. I am very grateful of your input – if you have any further comments, let me know!
Fribbulus Xax (talk) 12:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Canadian National Vimy Memorial

Could you please review you A Class Assessment of Canadian National Vimy Memorial and let me know if any additional work is needed. --Labattblueboy (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

RFA

I see you have logged an oppose opinion in my RFA. If my request fails, how long would you recommend I wait before logging another request?--RadioFan (talk) 15:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to wait until the end of your RfA to respond to this, if that's okay. ceranthor 15:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

FPs

I messaged Durovabut got no response, so I'll try you instead, since you do FPs too; do you think File:Close-up of a skylight on coastal plain, with lava stalactites forming on the roof of the tube.jpg is good enough :) ResMar 02:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey. The image is unsharp and therefore I doubt it will pass FPC. There are a number of commons image that could be nominated, if you look around the galleries. FPs are so much fun to find; they're so beautiful! Btw, could you comment here? The fac had 7 supports and some remaining stuff but was getting too old so it had to be restarted. Hope I helped. ceranthor 13:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I just hope this stuff gets easier as it goes foward. I don't want another Loihi. I just can't stand grinding half a year on something again. I finally understand the exodus I suppose. It's nearly impossible to get an actual textual review; instead I get all this ALTS and REFS and IMAGES and other nonsense. ResMar 16:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm just afraid I'm a bit biased when it comes to that article... I've copyedited it and stuff. If you want me to comment further, but not !vote, that'd be fine with me. It only gets easier, trust me. FAC #4 for me only took 10 days. ;) Number 5 isn't so cooperative. ceranthor 16:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the support at the FAC for Bale Out. That particular sentence was gone over a bit already - but perhaps you could suggest some way to improve the wording? Cirt (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It just doesn't work with the subsequently fired clause. It seems like you're saying Bale was not subsequently fired. Do you see what I mean? You just need to rewrite the sentence altogether, no biggie. I'm going to sleep now. :p Bye, ceranthor 03:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Better? Cirt (talk) 03:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Vancouver

		WikiProject Vancouver
		You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Dear FA Team member, we could use your help if you're available. Mkdw ^talk 06:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

A clarification?

I'm not sure I understand your concern that I "basically did nothing last year"; as far as I can tell, I have participated in every case I was not recused (drafted two), was diligent on all requests pages and did my share of the internal work. I've set the audit subcommittee into motion, and participated in the discussion around other reforms.

I'd appreciate if you told me where you see I was lacking so that I may keep an eye on it in the future? — Coren ^(talk) 17:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It's not nearly as extreme as you think. It's not that I think you don't do good work, I'm just not "whoa!" impressed by you. Please don't take that as an insult; I don't mean it to be one. Arbitrators should be articulate, well versed, and intelligent-you have all of those characteristics for sure but I'm not particularly sure you did good enough work to be re elected. If that doesn't make sense to you, send me an email and I can give you an elaborate response. Best, ceranthor 21:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

No, that's quite allright; I just misunderstood what you meant. Thanks for clarifying. Now go vote (whoever for). — Coren ^(talk) 01:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

NCVP nomination

Yo; having problems on candidate. BT (talk) 21:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I am fine to handle with Elcobbola's image copyright problems. What I was trying to mention was Fifelfoo's references problems. Are you willing to help with this? It's just that I do not know enough about referencing so I'm likely not the user to fix such problems. BT (talk) 00:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Haha, BT no one can handle him. He's plunging things left and right with that stuff...I'll try and help you though :) ResMar 00:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Black Tusk, no big deal. I'll look through google and see if there's anything you're missing. Since the article is already 52 kb, I doubt it, but, hey, you never know. ;) ceranthor 01:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, if it's nothing to worry about then I wouldn't worry about it. I just don't want the candidate to fail over some stupid referencing problem..... BT (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Gz

		The Volcanoes Barnstar
		I'm very much suprised you haven;t gotten this one yet. You certainly deserve it for all your hard work. :) ResMar 00:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm honored. ceranthor 01:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

1997 Qayen earthquake

hi there. As you will see from the above page's history, and the FAC discussion, i changed my mind, and decided it actually needed a bit of work. I'm done for now, but have left one issue for consideration at the discussion. Hope i've helped. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:

Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew ^talk at 03:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk:1989 Loma Prieta earthquake/GA1

Hi, are you intending to complete this review? - last comment was 17 October 2009. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Ouch - I'm sorry. I completely forgot about the review. The article failed. ceranthor 15:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hitting upon the puck before it starts

Two things:

How often are Volcano articles at TFA?
Don't reserve a Volcano article for TFA in October 2010. That slot's mine :)

Cheers, ResMar 03:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Um, I don't think there's been a volcano article since Nevado del Ruiz. You can check around then, but I doubt there'll be that many slots open now in December 09 for October 10. You can check through Wikipedia:Featured articles that have been on the main page too. ceranthor 03:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Well that's promosing news, as it brings my total to 5 points! Plus flexability in dating (the FeMO cruise is over a few days), that means that this is a good one. However, um redlink...? ResMar 00:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA

I fear your coding, especially since my spam template has apparently caused some havoc! So I'll just say thanks very much for participating in my RfA (passed (93/1/3). KV5 (Talk • Phils) 02:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ode on a Grecian Urn/archive1

I just wanted to let you know that the FAC nomination for "Ode on a Grecian Urn" has been restarted. If you have a moment, feel free to take a look at the changes that have taken place since your last assessment and state any concerns you might have. Thanks Mrathel (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Sure. ceranthor 14:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

POTD notification

Hi Ceranthor,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:MtRedoubtedit1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 14, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-12-14. howcheng {chat} 06:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Collab

I have 2 articles sitting at GAN and Fifelfoo promised to go through the refs for Hawaii hotspot, which would be the final clearence I need to relist it at FAC (oh and something at DYK, too). In the meantime I'm open for shop; although I'm most definatly have to deal with all that stuff later, in the meantime I'm open to start that collab with you on Kilauea! One thing I want to point out however: it's a lot easier to clear the new 2c plunge going around from the beggining rather then rechecking all the refs later, so I want them to figure to what Fif told me here from the beggining.

Hopefully you're open for one more project, eh? :) ResMar 00:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

As always, I am surely open. Just gimme the weekend to finish my FAC article. Thanks, ceranthor 20:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

M'kay call me when you're ready :) ResMar 21:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, typing the info in word now. Don't bother me! ;) ceranthor 21:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Yo ho ho

Ϣere SpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks! I hope your holidays are equally excellent! ceranthor 21:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Damn. THe spamfest has begun. I will make all my prey...! ResMar 02:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Gestures ...

I noticed your beautiful gesture in my watchlist ... The universe takes note of such things in the balance. (It told me so. :-) Cheers, and happy holidays. [no reply necessary, but some espresso would be nice] Proofreader77 (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree, Shakespeare is beautiful... he told me so. ;) ceranthor 03:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

But thank you. It was something that needed saying, and besides, I'm relatively nobody so this is the best I can do for Ottava. I hope someone gives him another chance. ceranthor 03:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Today, a voice without weight spoke on my behalf... I sobbed when I read it because it put all around it in context ... and tears come to my eyes now as I type this. One of the most beautiful things I have ever seen. And such is my way to notice. Bless you and your endeavors. Hail the Bard! :-) Proofreader77 (talk) 03:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Er, thank you. I don't think it was all that great, 'twas a testament to Ottava and nothing more. ceranthor 03:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

To conclude with a perfect quote from the canceled series Dollhouse, "This conversation is getting vague." :-) My true story from [today] says simply: "relatively unimportant" is not a constraint for action ... unless, of course, you don't want to be banned. lol (Lightness is usually more my style than pathos. Strange day.) Adieu. Proofreader77 (talk) 03:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Life in general

I'm still here; I haven't gone away. It's not as if I all of the sudden burnt out, I just don't feel like spending most of my life on Wikipedia. It's still fun, just not when you have 2000 edits a month. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 21:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Another good pic

What about this? ResMar 02:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout

Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Editor Review: done

I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/Ceranthor/Archive 16. Sorry for the delay in getting one done - we are slowly catching up with the backlog!

Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 30 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).

The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet - if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!

If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor - this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on.

I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Query

Hi Ceranthor; I replied to your query on my talk page.[1] Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

You know

I think you should run RFA at the start of next year. I think you've addressed the concerns at RFA 2, certainly the perceived "maturity" issues. Tap me up for a nomination if you like (unless you go crazy between now and then!) or if not be assured of my strong support. Pedro : Chat 09:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

First of all, lol. Second, there's been some offline speculation... and the set date appears to be March. NuclearWarfare has offered to nom, and you, and Ched I believe... I can brief you via email if you want the full details. ceranthor 21:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

...lol. 1 nom, ok, but 3? oO ResMar 23:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Yup, apparently, and now there's 1 more... ceranthor 14:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Segula Volcano

I've reviewed your DYK nomination at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Segula_Volcano and suggested an alternative hook. Could you take a look? Cheers. Smartse (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Hello, Ceranthor. You have new messages at Resident Mario's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Too late for that. Java doesnt work for me anyway...can you go to #wikipedia though? I made it there at least. ResMar 20:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

NCVP

I just re-nominated this for FAC. BT (talk) 19:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Shit

We're moving right now, right, and whatever, but my parents don't even bother to tell me that because of this we'll have NO INTERNET FOR A WEEK! Luckily, I can still do it elsewhere, but my resources will be cut pretty severely...Res Mar 22:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

ER Thanks

Hello, Ceranthor! This is just a note thanking you for participating in my recent editor review. Thank you again for your view on my editing as I will be sure to keep your opinion and advice in mind!
IShadowed (Talk)

Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator. Jusdafax 22:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Enjoy the season!

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

May this season bring you joy and cheer Ceranthor! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 23:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Segula Volcano

On December 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Segula Volcano, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! ceranthor 20:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Reorganization

Totally tired of it. I'm working on a reorganization of the Volcanoes project. ResMar 17:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

what happened to "I have no internet"? ;) ceranthor 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thy were wrong, thank god :D So does it look good so far? ResMar 19:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, one thing, do you remember the code to make the two cells of the table equal in height? I forgot it and really need it...Res Mar 19:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, do you know where the Volcanoes barnstar is kept? I can't find the page for it...Res Mar 19:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA

Hello, Ceranthor. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for 1940 New Hampshire earthquake

On December 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1940 New Hampshire earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! ceranthor 20:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

FA-Team revival

I've made a proposal to bring the FA-Team out of inactivity—with a mission a bit different than we're used to. This is just a generic note I'm sending to members asking for their input. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

1997 Qayen earthquake

Thanks for your hard work on 1997 Qayen earthquake. I've revisited the article, copyedited a bit, and changed to a support. Please review the changes I made and make sure I didn't distort the meaning somehow. Also, note that I don't often see emails as I tend not to check email when I'm stressed - I am much more likely to notice a message on my talk page (that is kinda sad, isn't it?). Karanacs (talk) 19:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Yay, what a wonderful thing to return home to. I'll check over them asap. Thanks! ceranthor 01:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Just a little something you'd be interested in. So...how many have you written? :) ResMar 01:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

A bunch - they should be at my /bragsheet page. ceranthor 01:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)