User talk:Carriearchdale/Archive 1

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Jodi Arias has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jodi Arias was changed by Carriearchdale (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952081 on 2014-01-03T03:42:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Moosehadley 03:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jodi Arias with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Moosehadley 03:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jodi Arias with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Moosehadley 03:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jodi Arias. Moosehadley 04:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Moosehadley 04:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mauricio Mazzetti may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Mauricio Mazzetti''' was born June 18, 1986, in [[Córdoba, Argentina]]) is an Argentine football [[Defender (association football)|defender]], currently playing for [[AEK

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Carriearchdale/sandbox (January 5)

Articles for creation reviewing

Books and Bytes - Issue 7

Decision on requesting unblocking?

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014

GOCE July drive and August blitz

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014

Books and Bytes - Issue 8

Case#Review_of_policy_that_led_to_the_blocking_of_Carriearchdale_in_order_to_avoid_repeat

GOCE October 2014 newsletter

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux