User talk:Carlossuarez46/Archive 20
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Carlossuarez46. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 |
The article Armistead, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information found about this location, except a bulletin of freight shipping rates from 1922. Clearly non-notable railway point. Satelllite reveals a single small farm surrounded by empty desert. Not populated, thus failing WP:GEOLAND, and no secondary coverage, failing WP:GNG. Another stub on a non-notable California location created by the same prolific, lazy user in 2009 based only on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Baker, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Satellite image of coordinates shows an open-pit borax mine. No information found. No evidence this was ever a populated place, and the sources cited do not establish notability, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. Another stub on a non-notable California location created by the same user during a few-week period in 2009, based only on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Goler Heights, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. From the few sources found, this seems to have been a mining district, not a populated place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. All sources found are passing mentions, not secondary, and/or not reliable, thus failing WP:GNG. Another stub on a nonexistent California place created by the same retired user in a few-week period in 2009, based only on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Hub, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railway point; no information found. Another low-effort stub based solely on GNIS, created by the same retired user in 2009. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Hydril, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Absolutely NOTHING is about 2 miles ENE of Avenal. This is a non-notable location; satellite images reveal the ruins of what may have been an oil drilling operation. No evidence found this was ever a populated place, failing WP:GEOLAND, and lack of secondary coverage (other than passing mentions in geologial or oil-well reports) fails WP:GNG. Another low-effort stub created by the same retired user during a few-week period in 2009, based only on GNIS entries.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Aerial Acres, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial Acres, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"Woodford, California" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Woodford, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 28 § Woodford, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Barstow, Fresno County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; really just a neighborhood in Fresno, lacking any significant secondary coverage (sources cited just confirm the location exists and are unreliable and/or trivial, giving only data). Without secondary coverage it fails WP:GNG. Almost anyone searching for Barstow would have Barstow, California (San Bernadino County) in mind, so this article is confusing clutter.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Camden, Fresno County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. The only mention of this location I could find in any source is a passing description of a "skimming station" from 1903: [1]. Nothing else found suggesting this is a community; satellite images show a Camden Mobile Home Park and a Sinclair gas station, but mobile home parks are not legally-recognized communities per WP:GEOLAND. This is another questionable stub created solely from GNIS data by a now-retired user who mass-created dozens of low-quality articles like this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Cedarbrook, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information found about this place. Plenty of sources discuss the Cedarbrook Inn, but that appears to have been in either Madera County or Mariposa County near CA 41, not in Fresno County. Satellite image of coordinates show forested land with a couple of houses in the area. Without sources this site fails WP:V; there is no evidence this was ever a legally-recognized populated place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. Another low-effort stub based solely on GNIS entries created by the prolific Carlossuarez46 in 2009.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Crabtree, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information at all found about this place; satellite image of coordinates show empty land with what might be an old barn nearby. Without any evidence this was a populated place, WP:GEOLAND is not met. Another low-effort stub based entirely on GNIS by the prolific and lazy Carlossuarez46.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Elm View, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; fails WP:GEOLAND. Only passing mentions found in news (mentions of a service station at this site); satellite images show several automobile-related businesses around an otherwise rural intersection. No evidence found this was a populated place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Kanawyers, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I can't find any information about this site. There was certainly a Kanawyers family in the area, but no references to a community of Kanawyers were found, failing WP:V. Since Cedar Grove, California is a real place, and it's unlikely anyone would search for this location given its obscurity, I think it's best to simply delete the stub.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Ora, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. The coordinates seem to be in error because satellite images show empty agricultural land with no buildings or railroad structures anywhere. Without any sources to show this was ever a populated place, it fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Rock Haven, Fresno County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; no information found. Satellite images show empty forest. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Wildflower, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Only passing mentions found, no significant coverage. Satellite images show a liquor store and a couple of scattered houses in an agricultural area. Without further sources there isn't evidence this is a recognized populated place, failing WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Bass Lake Annex, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information found about this place that was distinct from Bass Lake. Appears to be a non-notable housing development or subdivision. Without legal recognition this fails WP:GEOLAND, and without secondary coverage it fails WP:GNG. Another stub on a non-notable California location based solely on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
"Kami, Iran" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Kami, Iran has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 29 § Kami, Iran until a consensus is reached. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 18:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Bonita, Madera County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Common name makes it difficult to search for information; I can find references to a Bonita Homes subdivision and a Bonita Ranch but I don't think they match this place. Satellite image just shows a crossroads with a couple of houses surrounded by farmland. No evidence given that this is a populated legally-recognized place, failing WP:GEOLAND and no significant coverage, failing WP:GNG. Another low-effort stub created by the same user based only on GNIS entries during a brief period in 2009.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Cascadel Woods, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. This source: [2] establishes that it is just a "subdivision", which is not a legally recognized populated place. WP:GEOLAND is thus not satisfied. All other mentions of this location have been passing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Daulton, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; I can find information about the Daulton family but nothing about this place. Satellite image just shows a ranch surrounded by miles of open range. No evidence this was a populated legally-recognized place and no coverage of any kind, thus failing both WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. And it's not on the Southern Pacific Railroad, the tracks were removed many decades ago.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Fine Gold, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable place; post office and GNIS do not establish notability. Only passing mentions of a Fine Gold Creek and a Fine Gold mining district have been found, nothing about the community. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Fresno Crossing, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresno Crossing, California (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Gregg, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information found about this place other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability. Literally the only mention I could find was a directory of shipping rates from 1922 ([3]). Clearly non-notable location with no evidence of population, failing both WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Existence of a post office does not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Indian Lakes Estates, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Lakes Estates, California (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Indian Springs, Madera County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Completely non-notable location; satellite images show an isolated ranch surrounded by open rangeland. No information found. Clear failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND; another low-effort stub created by the prolific Carlossuares46 based entirely on a GNIS entry, which does not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Lake Madera Country Estates, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Lake Madera Country Estates, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Madera Country Club Estates, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Madera Country Club Estates, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Old Corral, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; satellite images show only a small store and a few scattered residences. No evidence this is a recognized place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND; sourced only to GNIS, which does not establish notability. No secondary coverage found at all. Another low-effort stub mass-created by the same retired user in 2009, based only on GNIS entries, which do not prove notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect River Road Estates, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § River Road Estates, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect San Joaquin River Estates, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § San Joaquin River Estates, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Sharon, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad siding. No information about this place found, thus failing WP:GNG, and no evidence found it was a recognized populated place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. Another poor-quality stub created by the same user in 2009 based only on GNIS entries, which do not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Storey, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not an "unincorporated community", a thoroughly non-notable train station. No evidence that this was a populated place and no secondary coverage, thus failing WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Sources are all passing mentions and/or broken links.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Sumner Hill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not an "unincorporated community". A non-notable upscale housing development with zero significant secondary coverate, failing both WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. No significant coverage found. Another useless stub created by the same retired user during a few-week binge in 2009, based only on GNIS entries.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Valley Lake Ranchos, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable housing development; little information found. No legal recognition and no secondary coverage, failing WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Whisky Falls, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a "community", a waterfall with a campground nearby. No information found. Clear failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Another low-quality stub sourced entirely to GNIS, which does not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Valley Lake Ranchos, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley Lake Ranchos, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Sumner Hill, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumner Hill, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Brito, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This does not appear to be a notable location. I can find passing mentions in old reports from the USDA about waterfowl populations, and in books on bird habitat, such as [4]. I can also find a "Britto Land and Cattle Company", suggesting this is a ranch; most likely it was just a railroad waypoint. Satellite images show an intersection near an irrigation ditch, with no other man-made structures nearby. Definitely not a "community" and without significant coverage it fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Calpack, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This location does not appear to be notable. Lots of information is available online about the California Packing Corporation (Del Monte), who did have a cannery in nearby Atwater and were sometimes called Calpack. But the coordinates for this location show a veterinary hospital and a farm surrounded by orchards. Apart from the Atwater facility, I can't find any other information about a Calpack in Merced County. Most likely this was just a railroad waypoint on Calpack-owned land, not an "unincorporated community". With a lack of significant coverage this location fails WP:GNG. It automatically fails WP:GEOLAND because it isn't a legally-recognized place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Fergus, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is not an "unincorporated community", it's a non-notable railroad siding. Satellite images show a railroad track with a stockyard on one side and the CA 99 freeway on the other. Only two mentions of Fergus could be found: a 1916 newspaper article on produce shipments from the Atwater area, which is a very cursory mention: [5], and a 1925 report of the Railroad Commission of the California State Legislature, mentioning the abandonment of a short rail spur originating at the site: [6] (I can also find a few federal records of this abandonment). This is the definition of passing mention. Nothing else found, failing both WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Another low-effort stub based solely on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Kadota, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As far as I can tell, this was not a community at all, it was a fig-canning facility (still standing as an industrial park). The company was involved in a significant legal case that reached the California Supreme Court: [7]. All other mentions I can find concern the cannery and are passing; there is plenty on the Kadota fig variety but nothing about this location. Since it's not a community, WP:GNG applies, and is not met because the legal case is the only notable finding, and that applies to the cannery and not the "community" (which never existed).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The article The Grove, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nondescript name makes it hard to search for information, but this appears to just be a housing development, based on satellite images. Non-recognized settlements like this are subject to WP:GNG, which is not met here. There also appears to be an apartment complex in Merced called The Grove, which is unrelated. Without evidence this was ever a legally-recognized significant place, it is not notable enough for an article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Trent, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a "community", a non-notable railway siding. Not a single mention found in local media or in online books that I could check; only information available comes from sites that scrape Wikipedia and this page: [8], which is likely AI-generated garbage that takes several awkward sentences to say the place was probably named after the Council of Trent (even if true, who cares). Completely non-notable and totally lacking in information makes this place a clear fail of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Another stub based solely on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Hermoton for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermoton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Queen of Hearts ❤️ (no relation) 02:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Fine Gold, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fine Gold, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Pizona, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is inaccurate. Pizona is not an "unincorporated community" or "community" of any kind, it is an empty area high in the mountains along the California-Nevada border. Satellite images show an empty canyon with a very rough dirt road but no other human-made structures evident nearby. Searching the term reveals vague references to a "Pizona country" ([9]) or an "area known as Pizona" ([10]), but these are cursory passing mentions that very clearly do NOT describe the place as anything resembling a community; book sources only reveal similarly passing mentions of a "Pizona site" for soil collections. The evidence suggests this is not and never was a populated place, thus WP:GEOLAND is not met, and without secondary coverage WP:GNG is also not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Shalehdun for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalehdun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hongsy (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Kehshur Asgar Babai for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kehshur Asgar Babai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hongsy (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Malekabad-e Shandak for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malekabad-e Shandak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hongsy (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Yusofjerd for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusofjerd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hongsy (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Willow Springs, Mono County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Motels and trailer parks are not inherently notable, and are subject to WP:GNG. This does not seem to be met; the two cited sources do not establish notability. There are many places in California named Willow Springs so this site should be deleted to avoid confusion and clutter.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Elliott Corner, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Rural intersection, not a community. Satellite image shows a T-intersection with a few houses in the area. Only mentions have been a very passing mention in a Life article from 1968: [11], and a couple of equally trivial mentions in obituaries. There seems to have been another Elliott Corner in Stanislaus County (of which I can find only equally trivial mentions), so this stub is confusing and anyway provides no information. Not a populated place so clearly fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Darrah, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is a Darrah Road and a Darrah Park, but I can't find any mention of a community. This book [12] confirms there was a post office by that name, but that is not an indicator of notability. Satellite image shows a park surrounded by forest, no evidence of habitation. Without evidence this is or was a populated place it fails WP:GEOLAND and without secondary coverage (only passing mentions) it fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
The article Bridgeport, Mariposa County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This location is not notable; no evidence found that this was a populated or legally-recognized place, so it fails WP:GEOLAND. The only information found about this place is three passing mentions in a book on Mariposa County settlers, just stating that someone lived there: [13], and one passing mention in a book on poisonous plants of California, mentioning some cattle died there in 1944: [14]. Needless to say this is nowhere near significant coverage; most likely this was just a ranch, which is what appears in satellite images. Due to the actual Bridgeport, California (Mono County) being not very far away, this article is misleading and confusing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Granite Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I can find several passing mentions to this place (as a mining district, a school, and a few one-off mentions in obituaries) but no significant coverage. No evidence this was a legally-recognized populated place, and the sources cited do not establish notability. It therefore fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Seems to have a few scattered ranches today. Would be nice if more information could be found, but as it is there doesn't seem to be anything to say about this place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Hayward, Mariposa County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Precisely zero information found about this location; obviously not notable. Satellite image reveals open ranchland. The actual Hayward, California in Alameda County would be the only Hayward anyone would search for on Wikipedia, making this stub a confusing, information-less waste of space. The cited sources do not establish notability, and the fact that someone thinks the sunrise and sunset times of this point on the globe is of interest does not impress me.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Blanchard, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information about this site found; no mention in the Arcadia Publishing book on Mariposa County, nor in the "Notable Locals" book on Mariposa County by same publisher, nor in the 1912 history of Mariposa County by M.B. Levick. Existence of a post office does not confer notability, and without any other information this is a clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite image of coordinates show a ranch, which is probably all there ever was here. Another low-effort stub based entirely on GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Laugenour, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Appears to have just been a local railroad stop for serving farms: [15]. Lots of information about the Laugenour family could be found, but nothing about this place; just a rail point on the family's land. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Vin, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not an unincorporated community; a non-notable point on the railroad tracks. Satellite image of coordinates reveal a volunteer fire station and a barn, nothing else. No information found; clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Fremont, Yolo County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a notable location; possibly nonexistent. No references in any source could be found, save for a 1916 USGS topo map that lists Fremont as a point on the railroad track, with no "community" anywhere: [16]. References 1 and 2 do not establish notability, and references 3 and 4 are dead links. Since Fremont, California is a significant city not too far away, this article is a confusing waste of space. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Camp Pardee, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. I can find lots of information about Pardee Dam, Pardee Reservoir, and the Pardee Reservoir Recreation Area, but next to nothing about Camp Pardee (except passing mentions in articles about the dam or lake). Arcadia Publishing book on northern Calaveras County has nothing about Camp Pardee: [17]; as for other sources, GNIS does not establish notability; second reference is not verifiable. Redirect to Pardee Dam would also be appropriate.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Fuchs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a notable location; GNIS does not establish notability and is unreliable. No other information found about this site. Impossible to verify, and clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite view shows only an isolated ranch labeled as the Fort Mountain Ranch.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Hodson, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Very little information about this location was found. It appears to have been a mine or mining area, but not a town; the only reference to a community ([18]) is a passing mention ("the old town of Hodson northwest through Salt Springs Valley..."). Without evidence this was a populated recognized place, it fails WP:GEOLAND. Satellite image of coordinates shows a small man-made reservoir with few human structures nearby.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Atlas, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Sources establish existence but not notability. I could find lots of information about an Atlas Peak, Atlas Peak Winery, and an Atlas Fire, but nothing about a "community" of Atlas; likely it was just a resort. Satellite view reveals a vineyard on Atlas Peak Road; no "community" visible.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Collins, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railway point, not an "unincorporated community", and it's now located within American Canyon, not "annexed and incorporated into" (an unsourced claim; no evidence was found this was ever a legally-recognized place). Fails WP:GEOLAND; sources cited do not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Carneros, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Having a post office for one year in the 1860s does not establish notability; nor do either of the sources cited. This is a non-notable location that is colocated with Cuttings Wharf, California, itself of questionable notability but at least documented. No information found. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Tuluka, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information about this location found. I'm all in favor of having articles on Indigenous communities that have been neglected, but we need to have documented information about them, otherwise we're making things up, and the two cited sources do not establish notability and do not provide any information. Non notable. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Lowell, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is inaccurate, or at least misleading. Lowell was not "annexed and incorporated into" American Canyon; it was a non-notable railway point. No coverage found, almost all mentions of a Lowell in Napa County press have been either to people with that name or to Lowell High School. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Oak Knoll, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Plenty of coverage of the AVA/"district", but nothing at all about a "community" of Oak Knoll. Without reliable sources covering this location, this is a failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. I could support a redirect to Oak Knoll District of Napa Valley AVA.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Rocktram, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not an "unincorporated community", a non-notable railway point where rocks were loaded onto trains. References 1 and 2 are insufficient to establish notability; reference 3 is not about the location at all ("Rocktram" appears nowhere in the text, it's an article about quarrying in Napa County), and reference 4 refers to a "rock tram" but it's a passing one-sentence mention. Nothing about this location found, clear failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. The fact that it's also known as Rockfram should be a dead giveaway that this was never a community; how many communities go by two names where one is an obvious typo of the other?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Spanish Flat, Napa County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Little information found other than passing mentions; references 1 and 2 do not establish notability, and reference 3 doesn't mention the place at all. Appears to be a mobile home park, which is a non-recognized settlement subject to WP:GNG, which is not met as little to no significant coverage could be found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Thompson, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another non-notable railroad waypoint, not a community. No information found. Sources do not establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Woodleaf, Napa County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information found at all; all media hits refer to a different Woodleaf in Yuba County. Sources cited do not establish notability. Satellite view shows only a rural residence surrounded by vineyards. Nothing to base an article on.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Afatlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No apparent notability and article itself indicates that this settlement may not even exist. Has also remained a stub since 2008.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan the Animator 02:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Cape Horn, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable location, no information found. I can find plenty about a Cape Horn Dam, but that's nowhere near this location; satellite view shows just empty forest with a couple of scattered ranches. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Crowley, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable flag stop on the California Western Railroad. No other information found; there were several Crowleys in Mendocino County, so the stop was probably named for their land. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG due to absence of evidence this was a populated place, and absence of significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The article DeCamp, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railway point where a now-abandoned railroad crossed US 101. No information found; satellite view shows only a road and a parking lot for some kind of business. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Fair Oaks, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Absolutely nothing found that was unambiguously about this location; all searches turned up mentions of Fair Oaks, California which is actually a place. Satellite view shows a nondescript residential area on the outskirts of Willits. Sources cited do not establish notability and are quite possibly in error. This is a clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG, and is confusing to boot because of the real Fair Oaks in the Sacramento area.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Indian Springs, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nonexistent location; no information found. Satellite view shows a barn surrounded by forest. Without any coverage this fails WP:V, WP:GNG, and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Inglenook, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only passing mentions of this place were found, no in-depth secondary coverage as required by WP:GNG. Seems to just be a non-notable residential area with no legal recognition. There is an Inglenook Creek, Inglenook Fen, and an Inglenook Winery (not related, located all the way over in Napa County) but little to be said about Inglenook, the community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Ingram, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information about this place found. No mentions in local media or in books. Satellite view shows an Ingram Cemetery and a residence or two, but nothing more, suggesting this was just a landowner's property that somehow made its way into GNIS. Sources cited do not establish notability; this is another failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG created by blindly transcribing data from GNIS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Laughlin, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable point on the railroad. No information found other than the two cited sources, which are not sufficient for notability. Satellite view shows a level crossing with a few scattered residences in farmland. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Kenny, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sources confirm there was once a post office by this name, but I can't find any information about this place. The cited sources are insufficient for notability, and nothing else was found. Nothing appears at the site today. This likely was a settlement of some kind but in the absence of any real documentation we can't have an article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Allendale, Fremont, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article seems to be a mistake. The coordinates, which are given in this article and listed in GNIS, are for Allendale, Oakland, California.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 15:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Oasis, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information about this place was found; there were news mentions of local businesses named Oasis, and an unrelated raceway in Lake County, but nothing about this place. Satellite view just shows a ranch along route 175. Fails WP:GEOLAND since there is no evidence this was a populated, legally recognized place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Riverdale, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. I can find references to a Riverdale Resort (which has a Leggett address), and to a Riverdale housing development in Ukiah, but nothing about a community with this name. Most hits are referring to the Riverdale in the San Joaquin Valley, hundreds of miles to the southeast. A satellite view just shows a couple of houses along the highway. Without evidence of this being a populated, legally recognized place, it's a failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The article South Fork, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to be a notable location. Nondescript name makes it hard to search for information, but local news mostly report on a South Fork High School, with no clear indication this school is connected to this "community". Satellite imagery just shows a bend in the railroad tracks surrounded by forest. No other information found. Most likely this is just a non-notable railway point. It therefore is subject to WP:GNG, which it fails.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The article The Oaks, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is factually inaccurate. The Oaks was the name of a business of some sort, probably a restaurant, located on CA 128 near Yorkville: [19]. The sources cited are not reliable, and no other information about this place could be found (at least, not that was unambiguously about this place and not one of the other tens of thousands of places in California known as The Oaks). Completely non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Satellite view just shows a few houses along a road called Big Oaks Drive.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Riverdale, Mendocino County, California for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverdale, Mendocino County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The article El Rio Villa, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not an "unincorporated community", a non-notable low-income housing development. The only secondary coverage that could be found, other than passing mentions, was a 1990 article about crime in the complex: [20]. As a housing project, this location is subject to WP:GNG, which it fails for lack of significant secondary coverage. It is not a legally-recognized populated place as demanded by WP:GEOLAND, and all other information that could be found was from database dumps or mirrors of Wikipedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)