User talk:Carliteminute

April 2020

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you recently removed content from AirAsia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 14:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malaysian Islamic Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Seloloving. I noticed that you recently removed content from United Malays National Organisation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seloloving (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I know what is PAS's stance on non-Muslims?

Regarding your removal of content about PAS, which mentions that PAS supports an Islamic theocracy and hatred of Christians, may I know from you how does the party treat non-Muslims?

PulauKakatua19 (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== I'm not supporters of PAS or PN either. But we can't directly identified PAS as terrorist group just because congratulate the Taliban and fyi I also not a supporter of Taliban. On stances on non-muslim I guess I have no info about it. But this is only my opinion, before Hadi PAS did really well, Kelantan example under Tok Guru he take care of the state. On example the Buddha but imo I didn't really seem that PAS is terrorist

@AdamPHPKR: Hi there after reading your statement yes we cannot label them as terrorist group but the reason why it is labelled as "disputed affiliation" is place there is because Isis is due to PAS members had join the ISIS cause in Iraq and Syria. Taliban is placed in there because they had congratulated the Taliban. Please understand the word "disputed affiliation" means that the affiliation is arguable and not an actual affiliation of by the party so that people learn from the action by PAS. However many people had their own views but we try to be as neutral while editing. Not be be bias here but PAS maybe a bit tolerant on race as long as you are part of islam. Now regarding the ideology, Anti Christ sentiment is because PAS had place certain very controversial laws like the infamous huddud law implemented on Terengganu which cause christian not allow to place their cross on public display. Moreover, former member Mohammed Sabu had also warn people that ISIS like thinking (islamofacism) is already infiltrated PAS and PAS also had tendencies to implement huddud law on federal level for all citizen of malaysia regardless muslim or not which is inherently not constitutional or fair. I'm here not arguing on whether PAS in itself is good or not but what they did was right or not. Francabicon (talk) 19:36 , 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Francabicon: Hi there, I did understand for that statement so to make its equal. I can also edit DAP page for supporting terrorist group (who ?) Ganesan Saminathan (ADUN Gadek) and (which group of terrorist ?) LTTE. In my opinion, you can't label all the party member as the terrorist or etc. In case with that I can also label all DAP's as terrorist. Isn't ? I'm really sorry if my words was too rude but I hope you are in good condition (p/s remember to read in peace tone not in angry tone)

@Adam PHPKR: Hmmm I'm not mad or angry but i'm actually ok with your argument and it is infact good to had a civil argument so that misunderstanding won't happen unlike people who doesn't want to talk about it and just revert the edit.Well maybe you might think that i just judge a few bad apples out of a apple trees but i do see pas members in isis ranks which is why we place it because you can't have PAS members join Isis so easily without temptation within the party members itself or else members from UMNO and Bersatu would also join terrorist organization too who by the way are also considered a religious party too. If not i would had place Isis in bersatu or umno pages. However No offense if you feel offended don't take it too seriously but it is just a civil discussion so we are civil people. Since this is still on discussion i'll not place disputed affiliation but I'll revert back the ideology in the topic. It is nice talking to you please if you had any concern or counter argument do let me know. Thank You. User:Francabicon|Francabicon]] (talk) 00:17 , 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Francabicon: Naa'ah I'm not angry but I maybe my word. I'm not thinking you're a bad apple it's fine but for me It's a bit not comfortable to see any of Malaysian political parties ideologies section has that part. This will make others foreigner that visit our political parties page will make them think that malaysian political parties supporting terrorist group. By the way, it is really nice to talk with you and sorry again if my words were too rude.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukma Games Diving 2024 (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At best, WP:THREE sources are good but there are two here. Also, we need to see the event being covered significantly in multiple reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukma Games Diving 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carliteminute! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukma Games Diving 2024 (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous declination rationale not met, still two sources. I can't find a referencing section, please clean the tables so that the references are clearly visible on the page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sukma Games Diving 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]