User talk:Carbone15

Welcome!

Hello, Carbone15, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Crater, Mendocino County, California, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - ʈucoxn\^talk 22:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crater, Mendocino County, California

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Crater, Mendocino County, California, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - ʈucoxn\^talk 22:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Frank Cady

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crater, Mendocino County, California

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Crater, Mendocino County, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PamD 20:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on California Western Railroad and the text in the article I moved Crater, Mendocino County, California to Pudding Creek, California and did not leave a redirect behind. If that is wrong please let me know. GB fan 00:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crater, Mendocino County, California

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Crater, Mendocino County, California, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 06:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crater, Mendocino County, California

The article Crater, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability - not a populated place (GNIS defines it as a "locale").

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 14:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenixville

If you have any sourced information about Phoenixville, please either create an article at the correct title Phoenixville, Connecticut (over-writing the existing redirect at that page) or add it to the mention of Phoenixville within Eastford, Connecticut. Please do not create articles at titles like Phoenixville, CT. (In trying to move it to the correct title while stub-sorting I discovered the existing redirect). Please note that all information added to the encyclopedia should include references to Reliable Sources. Thanks. PamD 14:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southington, Connecticut and Mount Vernon

Please take more care when adding links - you linked to Mount Vernon, which is a disambiguation page and does not include any place in Connecticut. I've fixed your link. You also linked to it twice in quick succession: we only link once per article, usually, with occasional multiple linking in a long article. I've unlinked the second mention. Thanks. PamD 07:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References for Huron, Indiana

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Huron, Indiana are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Landenberg Junction, Delaware, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wilmington, Southwood and Greenbank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Landenberg Junction, Delaware for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Landenberg Junction, Delaware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landenberg Junction, Delaware until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deal, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nelson, Oregon

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Carbone15, thanks for creating Nelson, Oregon!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Encina, Oregon

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Carbone15, thanks for creating Encina, Oregon!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Phelps' cause of death

Hello.

I saw that you said Fred's cause of death was Heart Failure. Where did you find that? I've looked at the sources that have been provided and can't seem to find it anywhere. I am in Kansas, and none of the news stations reported of him having heart failure. If you could tell me where you got it, that would be great! if you can't, then I don't think it should be there.

Thanks,

Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 20:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portuguese American neighborhoods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wethersfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reading 2102

The article Reading 2102 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The Reading 2101 is notable, but no indication why this locomotive would be a notable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Causes of death: unsourced and incorrect edits in multiple articles

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard N. Cabela another editor has pointed out that you added information about the subject's supposed cause of death here, and that this information is not supported by any sources and (according to the AfD nominator) this information was false.

I have now found a number of other articles where you have introduced content about the subject's cause of death that was unsupported by sources, and appears to have been incorrect. Examples include Richard LaMotta [1] (your edits also stated that the subject had no children, when the cited New York Times obituary specifically mentions three children), Anthony Jackson (actor) [2], Louis Zamperini [3], Bob Hoskins [4], David Neal [5], Tommy Ramone [6], Fred Phelps [7], John Attenborough [8], and Arthur Penn [9][10].

Could you please identify your sources of information for these edits? --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Angry Grandpa. Arxiloxos (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Rolfe

Hello, I just want to let you know that I'm reverting your recent edits (February 15, 2015) on the page James Rolfe (filmmaker), since they weren't supported by any external references or evidence. I'm not there. Message me! 19:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained edits

I have reverted your edits at Gordon Bell because "Chester" is reliably sourced, and because your changes to "Charles" had nothing to do with your edit summary of "Fixed grammar". Did you have a reason to make those edits? How about this edit at Peanut butter which changed a date from 1849 to 1850? Johnuniq (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kosciusko, Texas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kosciusko, Texas, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fifteenhours-creepystories.tumblr.com/post/133876030359/creepypasta-651-kosciuko-texas.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kosciusko, Texas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kosciusko, Texas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://fifteenhours-creepystories.tumblr.com/post/133876030359/creepypasta-651-kosciuko-texas. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 02:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Ranch, California"

Ranch, California, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Dcirovic (talk) 16:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Over the course of several years you have repeatedly been asked not to add unsourced content to articles, but you have continued to do so. You were also warned that continuing to do so might lead to being blocked from editing. I also see that "unsourced editing" is not the whole story: frequently your editing has put outright vandalism into articles. You have often, though not always, hidden such vandalism among other content, which appears to be valid, making the vandalism difficult to find. That also raises the possibility there may also be further "hidden" vandalism which has not been detected. This kind of vandalism is far more harmful to the encyclopaedia than more blatant vandalism, which is likely to be detected and reverted quickly. Considering all these facts, it seems that your editing may well be doing more harm than good to the encyclopaedia, and you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crater, Mendocino County, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crater, Mendocino County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crater, Mendocino County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 12:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carbone15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]