User talk:Captain Galaxy/Archive 1

Captain Galaxy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Captain Galaxy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deanna Mustard (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ugh, still not independently notable from the character she voices. No news sources presented. Do not reference IMDb.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deanna Mustard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deanna Mustard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TheRunawayGuys (TRG)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TheRunawayGuys (TRG) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lettler^hello 21:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Kawashima's Brain Training for Nintendo Switch has been accepted

Dr Kawashima's Brain Training for Nintendo Switch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Pink RfD

Hello, Captain Galaxy. As you can see by the responses at your RfD submission, WP:AFC/R is where you can submit for the AfC participants to create a new redirect. I'd also be willing to create this based on what you have presented and the current article section content. However, before you go to AfC or I create it, it looks like you should be able to create this yourself since you should be WP:Autoconfirmed soon, so I thought I'd point out how to do so. Note that if you create it, it will be usable immediately; however, it is still subject to a new page review from the WP:NPP participants, and if it is not suitable/referenced/verifiable, it may be deleted. (Shouldn't be an issue in this case.) This information can also all be found at this help page: Help:Redirect

You were recommending creation of Pokémon Pink. That appears as a red link, so you should be able to click it and access a page creation page that says "Creating Pokémon Pink". A redirect page in its most simple form is one line of content taking the format: #REDIRECT [[PAGENAME#SECTION NAME]]
And you would replace PAGENAME and SECTION NAME with what where you want the redirect to take you. In this case PAGENAME=Pokémon Yellow, and SECTION NAME=Pokémon Pink. So the most basic redirect you can create out of this is #REDIRECT [[Pokémon Yellow#Pokémon Pink]]. If you just copy/paste that into the text box and click submit, that will create the redirect.

Additionally, redirect category shells can be added to provide some extra information on what the redirect is. These are slightly more advanced, but it just requires adding templates for redirect categories. You can read more about that at WP:REDCAT if you like, but the categories I would add are {{R to section}} since you are going to a section of the Pokemon Yellow page, and maybe {{R from subtopic}}. (When NPP gets to your redirect, they will probably add these if you don't.) Additionally, you may want to create Pokemon Pink with the same exact content since it is a common possibility to not include an accent when typing in a search box. Feel free to copy/paste if you like, but if I were to create the page it would say:

Collapsed Example

#REDIRECT [[Pokémon Yellow#Pokémon Pink]]
{{Rcatshell|
{{R to section}}
{{R from subtopic}}
}}

Which will look something like:

#REDIRECT Pokémon Yellow#Pokémon Pink
This talk page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.

From a subtopic: This is a redirect from a subtopic of the target article or section.
If the redirected subtopic could potentially have its own article in the future, then also tag the redirect with {{R with possibilities}} and {{R printworthy}}.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Happy editing! -2pou (talk) 20:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2pou: Thank you so much for this information, this should really come in handy in the future. I just have a question to ask, do I put #REDIRECT Pokémon Yellow#Pokémon Pink at the top of the Pokemon Yellow article or in the specific Pokemon Pink section of the article. -Captain Galaxy (talk) 20:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, you would not edit anything in Pokemon Yellow or the Pokemon Pink section of Pokemon Yellow. You want to get to a page that says "Creating Pokémon Pink" that is entirely separate from any page you would click "Edit" on. The easiest way to do that is to click the red links that say Pokémon Pink because when you click a red link, Wikipedia prepares that page for creation for you. The layout will be something like this: -2pou (talk)

Collapsed New Page Text
Creating Pokémon Pink Bullet 1 of recommendations for new page creation Bullet 2...Bullet 4 Copyright warning Text Box (paste the #Redirect info here)

@2pou: I've done it, I want to say thank you again. -Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work! I'm glad I could help. I noticed you decided to forgo including the specific link to the #Pokémon Pink section. Did you intentionally decide not to include that, or did you still want a direct link to the section? If you don't think it's necessary, then the {{R to section}} category isn't necessary anymore. -2pou (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2pou: Don't worry, I've fixed it. -Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TheRunawayGuys (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Issues pertaining to sourcing have not been addressed. Changing MDY / DMY is a trivial task that can be done later.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TheRunawayGuys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TheRunawayGuys, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide Classics has been accepted

Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide Classics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 5 list change

Could you edit and apply the changes that are applied to PS4 and Xbox One lists? I assume the current list are going similar to the Nintendo Switch list, which is an entirely different list. Thank you! Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharyalejandro: I don't get what you mean, I am not the creator of the List of PlayStation 5 games page and I'm just tweaking any small mistake. Can you please elaborate? Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure can. Are you at all familiar with the List of PlayStation 4 games, its M–Z list, and both the List of Xbox One games lists? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the editing side of them, you can see they are split up and not shoved between one another similar to the List of Nintendo Switch games (A–L) and List of Nintendo Switch games (M–Z) which these are entirely different from another company. I don't want them to look the same. If you see where I'm going with this. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zacharyalejandro:I definitely understand what you mean, however I don't have the time at the moment as it is quite late. Also, I'm not the most experienced wikipedian. Try asking another user. Good luck in your search. Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you have any questions or something, ask and I'll try to help out. Have a good night or day wherever you are :) Zacharyalejandro (talk) 22:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfD relisting

I noticed you Relisted a bunch of RfD discussions unnecessarily. When an RfD has only delete votes, the default result per WP:RGUIDE is delete—so those should be left to admins. For more information, be sure to check out WP:RELISTBIAS and WP:Relisting can be abusive. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix: My apologies if I have messed anything up and I hope I haven't ruined anything. I will have a look further into the guidelines. I only relisted discussions that didn't have either a clear consensus or barely had any discussion on it. I guess I have a lot to learn on here. Thanks for the help. Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_13#Outline_of_art

I have a question. Which criteria for speedy keep does this follow? See WP:SK. Interstellarity (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Interstellarity: I'm sorry if I did anything wrong, I will undo the closure. However, I do feel like the discussion will result in a keep, but maybe not right now. Sorry for the inconvenience, I am still learning. 20:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janeese Lewis George

Hi Captain Galaxy, and I hope all is well! I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janeese Lewis George as keep, but the votes are pretty split, and I don't think that it was an obvious keep. Per WP:NACD "Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins". I'd consider this a close call (by my count there are six keep votes and six for deleting or draftifying), and would appreciate it if you re-opened it, leaving closure to an admin. If you'd rather, we could discuss further at deletion review. I'd just consider the closure not as obvious as perhaps you did, nothing wrong with that. Best wishes, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: Hi, sorry for any inconvenience and don't worry I have re-opened the discussion. I completely forgot that rule at the time and I am sorry. I hope I can be more helpful in the future. Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Completely fine! Thanks for your understanding and I hope to see you around in the future! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Janeese Lewis George. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Minor Nintendo franchises has been nominated for deletion

Category:Minor Nintendo franchises has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closure

I have undone yours per WP:BADNAC. Please read, and take on board. All the best, ——Serial^# 21:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: Hi, thank you for fixing any mistake I have made and I appreciate it, sorry for the inconvenience. However which AfD was the problem? Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also get the AfD was reopened due to it being a close call, which wouldn't be the problem. I apologise. Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BADNAC the second

To undo your closure of my RfD of Lady A, you must also undo the closing edits you made to the page and its talk page. Sandstein 16:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandstein: This has now been reverted. Again I am truly sorry. Captain Galaxy (talk) 16:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcutting relist

Hey, I just came across your relist of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_13#Woodcutting from a week ago. That discussion should have been left to an admin to close as either no consensus or with a compromise solution that accounts for the lack of consensus. It is incredibly rare for RfD discussions to be relisted three times, and in this case there was explicit discussion suggesting that a true consensus was going to be unlikely given the existing split of votes and arguments. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: My apologises for any inconveniences of which my mistakes may have caused. Is there any way for the relisting to be reverted? Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nah don't worry about it, at this point it's already been a week since the relist so the discussions can just be closed by an admin. Even if the week hadn't gone by, trying to undo the relist would have been more trouble than it's worth. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: That's good to hear. In future, I'll keep my activity on afd and rfd at a bare minimum until I become more accustomed with Wikipedia's rules as it seems I cause a lot of problems for people, not that I mean to. I hope in future we can together on better terms. Thanks! Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say that you need to stay away from those areas, but maybe focus on participating directly in the discussions rather than relisting them. There's a lot of unwritten norms around relisting that only become apparent when you've participated in discussions for a while. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NAC challenge

Hi Captain Galaxy, please reconsider your non-admin closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazutaka Kodaka. As you closed it, there are three !votes for keep, two !votes for redirect (which is NOT keep, it’s closer to delete than it is to keep), and the original nomination which for all intents and purposes is a delete !vote. By that count, that’s not a keep. That’s usually a relist. Red Phoenix ^talk 16:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Phoenix: Hi, I'm sorry for the NAC closure and I'm glad it's open again. I closed it because I thought it was 3 !votes for keep and 1 !vote to redirect. Sorry again for any inconvenience, thanks for the notice. Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NAC

I just came here to inquire about this close which I find to be inappropriate. Considering your very short tenure here, I'd like to ask you to stop NACing for hte time being. AFDs are not a count of votes - had I noticed this at the time, I would have challenged your close. An NC was inappropriate and should have been left to an admin based on the substance of the comments - two "keeps" by two people who have extensively edited the article(s) in question and one account which is a clear SPA have no weight. I notice this is a frequent problem based on the complaints on your talk page, so again, I'd like to reiterate my request you stop doing non-admin closures. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Hey, I'm sorry for the inconviances I have caused. You'll be happy to know I stopped doing this now and don't plan to in the future, this just happened to be a remnant from two weeks ago. I have reopened the discussion to get a better consensus. Thanks. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not kidding when I asked you to stop closing AFDs at best, this would be a NC in your case since it's all you can do. Please fix it. An admin could also delete it since it has no substance in the only two keep votes, one of which is an SPA and the other is someone heavily involved in the article and paid to do so. Praxidicae (talk) 11:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: OK, it's open and should stay there. I felt it was appropriate the first time to close as keep due to the outnumber. Please, I'm sorry. I don't want to get banned off of Wikipedia, I like what I do here and find it fun to help the encyclopedia. My apologises for this. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Elbrus Together. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FFD NACs

You have had plenty of warnings here about your WP:BADNACs. I am writing to let you know that I will be reversing all four of your WP:NACs from WP:Files for discussion, since as an administrator with more than ten years of experience in that area of the site, they were likely too close to call (two of them having no discussion after being relisted by other admins who felt they were too close to call). ★ Bigr Tex 03:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BigrTex: Please go ahead, I'm clearly a problem a problem here and wish and any mistakes by mine are reverted. Captain Galaxy (talk) 08:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if that is what came across from my message. My impression is that you are enthusiastic and trying to be helpful. In these cases, it did not work but it did not hurt anything. If nobody ever noticed those closes, it would almost certainly have not caused any significant harm - at some point, one or more of the files might have been renominated. I hope you have found more constructive ways to feel helpful and contribute around here. ★ Bigr Tex 23:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BigrTex: You are right about me wanting to be helpful here. I did like to close discussions but I now fully understand I need to be on Wikipedia a bit longer before should do that. Don't worry, I am interested in making articles. Thank you for the message though. Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash (video game) has been accepted

Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

en.wiki Encyclopedicity policy for Videogames

Good morning.
Which is the Encyclopedicity policy for Videogames in en.wiki??? I want to know because I want to traslate his page it:Utente:Esc0fans/Sandbox0 (written by mine, in cancelation in it.wiki). if you tell me if is possiblie, I'll start the translation (idk how much I need)
Thank you --Esc0fans -and my 12 points go to... 09:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Esc0fans: Hi Esc. While most of the information on this can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games, I'll give you a brief rundown. As with all of other topics, videogame articles follow The five pillars of Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset and these in the Wikipedia:List of policies. In addition, more information can be found here at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games. Captain Galaxy (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokémon Sword and Shield: The Isle of Armor has been accepted

Pokémon Sword and Shield: The Isle of Armor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nintendo Switch Stylus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nintendo Switch Stylus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon Café Mix Cover Art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Café Mix Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I don't mind you reverting my edit on Pokemon Cafe Mix. If a low-resolution image is all that is allowed then it may remain that way. MK8 Master (talk) 04:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten Amiibo figurine for you!

The Nintendo Barnstar

Ahoy, Cap'n! Incoming transmission hailing. Permission to board Talk page! I first saw your incredibly thorough and diligent work adding a zillion citations to Mario Kart 8 and New Super Mario Bros U. That was a lot. My only suggestion is to please include first=, last=, and date= especially for reviews because it's correct, because reviews are numerous, and because they get updated with the game over time. I was glad to honor your work by touching that up, so I hope you saw my stupid edit summaries there. I haven't given the Nintendo barnstar forever, probably to only one other person. If you'd like to see my masterpieces, check out 64DD, Mario Artist, Nintendo 64 Game Pak, etc. — Smuckola (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bagyong" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bagyong. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Bagyong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears at 12:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image Source

I'm trying to track down a higher res image of an image you uploaded and yours is the only version that seems to exist, i don't know where you got it. I was wondering if you could tell me where you go it from and provide a link to a source? It's a cover poster image for Super Mario 3D All Stars, the image has been changed now but your original one is the one I'm after https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/0/01/20200903140213%21Super_Mario_3D_All_Stars.jpg I'm not familiar with anything about wikipedia other then looking at the articles so If I'm violating any rules, well... idk wtf I'm doing, I just want a high res image. Thanks 51.37.98.2 (talk) 20:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@51.37.98.2:It appears that I obtained this image from the official website. https://supermario3dallstars.nintendo.com/ This was the link I got from both the edit history and google search for the image url. Google Here's a link to a google search for the image with the exact same resolution. Sorry if I couldn't be of more help. Captain Galaxy 20:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Mario Bros. 35th Anniversary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 21:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin has been accepted

Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 01:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Lego Nintendo Entertainment System.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lego Nintendo Entertainment System.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Lego Super Mario Figurine.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lego Super Mario Figurine.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents with a sole survivor has been nominated for deletion

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents with a sole survivor has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phasmophobia (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quit Cappin', Captain

No way you started these notable Nintendo game articles. You really beat everyone to making 51 Clubhouse Games? Or Super Mario Bros. 35th Anniversary? Wow. Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 14:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Panini: Indeed I did, in fact not only did I create them and proceed to ask for them to be reviewed, but I also contribute most of the edits on them as well. Thank you for the interest! Captain Galaxy 20:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Captain Galaxy:But how? Was it as soon as you got the notification, you created the article, or did nobody else try to? Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 17:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Panini: I did the articles when I feel like that there are games that need an article as they are notable. I usually do topics that no one else would likely do, the only time that didn't happen was when I did Phasmophobia as when I made the draft into an article, I discovered two others who were trying to a draft on the same article (fun fact: I was going to do Among Us however I felt the game wasn't notable, turns out I was very wrong). My recommendation is to check whether something is notable first before doing something like a draft. If you need help on what's reliable go here at WP:VG/S. Make absolutely sure, that an article on the topic or mentions of the topic in other articles. When you feel accomplished with a draft, you can either post the article to be reviewed by another more experienced user, or you can move the article into the Main article space. However, doing the second will eventually be under a review and can be deleted if it doesn't conform to standards. Hopes this answers your questions, thanks for the interest! Captain Galaxy 10:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and one more thing

Ahoy. I started creating a draft about the characters in Paper Mario: The Origami King because I'm bored and have nothing better to do except watch Youtube. You seem to have experience in this field (as in experience about fictional characters) and I want to get some opinions on it. It's still being created, I've only been working on it for 2 hours. Le Panini ^Talk 15:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le Panini Hmmmmm, this is interesting. Ok, you might have with The Origami King characters by themselves. I really don't think talking about Vivian matters too much as everything talked about in the draft is covered in the article in much greater detail. If you can find good coverage on the other characters such as Tippi, Kersti and Huey then I'd 100% say go for it. However, with just the Origami King characters, they could actually be a good case to make that these characters can be merged and elaborated further on The Origami King article. Now, here's the unfortunate, despite my contributions to the article, I've haven't played the game, and I am trying my hardest not to get spoiled, that's why haven't edited the plot section. So I can't look and review the origami portion of your draft. I'd recommended asking a reviewer who has more experience than me and has played the game. The only thing I can say is find as many sources as possible and make sure the characters are prominently mentioned in said sources. Sorry if I wasn't much help. Captain Galaxy 19:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Galaxy, So you're suggesting the article should discuss the main companions (Tippi, Kersti, Huey, and Olivia). While I think other allies should be in the article, I can barely find anything talking about them, other than just saying their name. The article might be much more successful if it just accounts the main protagonist allies; like, the ones that stick around the whole game. I'll see what I can do about the other three, and decide whether or not I'll do something about other allies.

And you gotta play TOK. I don't know if you're simply a Nintendo fan, or one of those people who can't look beyond TTYD and not compare the games (because they're nothing alike), but its one of the year's highlights. Le Panini ^Talk 23:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le Panini, Don't worry I'm planning on playing the game, I just don't have it yet. Also I've never played the first two games, out of the ones I've played Paper Mario: Color Splash was my favourite. Captain Galaxy 08:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]