User talk:Capslock99

Fair use rationale for Image:Wellacre Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wellacre Logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
You should not write articles about yourself, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

primary school creation spree

Hi Capslock. You may want to consider creating articles for school systems rather than independent articles for each elementary school. Most elementary schools are not considered notable by wikipedia standards (a prerequisite for existence as a separate article), and most primary schools that are nominated for deletion are eventually deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes). I would recommend that you create redirects from primary school names to the name of the school district, where you have a list of schools. This way your effort will not be wasted if these articles are deleted. Happy editing! Mangostar (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Acre Hall Primary

A tag has been placed on Acre Hall Primary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kkmurray (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stamford Park Infant School

A tag has been placed on Stamford Park Infant School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kkmurray (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Templemoor Infant School

A tag has been placed on Templemoor Infant School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kkmurray (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stamford Park Junior School

A tag has been placed on Stamford Park Junior School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kkmurray (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stamford Park Junior School, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do not remove Speedy Deletion warnings. Kkmurray (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thorncliffelogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thorncliffelogo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kkmurray (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Wellacre Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Wellacre Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Wellacre Logo.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth!

Did you even read what I was putting on the Ferrum_High_School page you idiot! How about read the page one is writing before deleting the content you... I am writing for out sister school south-africa!

Please be less reckless in future! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capslock99 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. In future, please sign your messages by typing ~~~~ at the end and remember to be civil.

Ferrum High School was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion, specifically number 11 under General as it was written in the form of an advertizement. Feel free to rewrite it from a neutral point of view, adding citations from reliable sources to comply with the verifiability policy. You should also read our conflict of interest policy. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what wasn't considered "neutral" about the text???

Capslock99 (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The entire text. It looks like an advertizement for why you should send your kids to this school. That is not what Wikipedia is for. Look at Aquinas College, Perth for an example of a good article about a school (which was previously very bad).

If you continue to recreate the article with the same text it is likely to be protected and prevented from recreation. Stifle (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Manor High School Sale

A tag has been placed on Manor High School Sale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cambrasa 09:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Manor High School Sale. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cambrasa 10:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Event ID

A tag has been placed on Event ID requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. nneonneo ^talk 07:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've made a lot of pages that have been marked for speedy deletion. May I suggest that you flesh out your article in a subpage, then move it to its final destination, fully formed? That way, you won't have to deal with having them tagged as speedy deletion candidates. nneonneo ^talk 07:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(please sign your posts with ~~~~) The article lacks context, not content. This means that I, or probably the majority of readers, wouldn't know what the article is referring to.

As for my other suggestion: you should consider making a subpage for your new articles, because you seem to introduce very short articles (which initially are candidates for speedy deletion), then edit them into shape over some period of time. If you did this on a user subpage, nobody will intrude and tag the page for deletion, and you can eventually move a completed article into the main article space, and have a much smaller chance of it being tagged for deletion. nneonneo ^talk 08:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your article is not clear at all on what an Event ID is. I'm a Computer Science student, and I have never heard the term; all I can gather is that it identifies an event (what kind of event? how does it identify it? where would you find one? why are they used?) and that it's found in a manifest (what's a manifest in this context? why is it found in a manifest?), to be used by a consumer (of what? who is the consumer? what do they want with it?)... You can see now that it is not clear, to me, or to someone who simply reads your article, what your article is about. For an article somewhat close to yours, see Timestamp. Until these issues are resolved, I won't remove the speedy tag. nneonneo ^talk 08:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In event logging, I have seen event IDs. However, the usage in the article is one I am not familiar with. If you get it to be a workable article, I or another user will remove the speedy tag. nneonneo ^talk 08:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Event ID 1030 (Windows Server 2003)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Event ID 1030 (Windows Server 2003), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.eventid.net/displayqueue.asp?eventid=1030. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Event ID

Dude, individual event IDs are in no way notable by wikipedia standards - a single article about event IDs and what their purpose is would be ok, but seperate articles for every event ID? no chance. --87.115.11.40 (talk) 11:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Event ID 9325 (Exchange)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Event ID 9325 (Exchange), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tikiwont (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Event ID 9323 (Exchange)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Event ID 9323 (Exchange), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tikiwont (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling on Gold

Please see our policy on English variations. Thanks! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Furness College Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Furness College Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kendalcol logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kendalcol logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Flixton Junior Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flixton Junior Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Trafford Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Trafford Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ACOA logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:ACOA logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wellacre Technology & Vocational College

I'm sure you meant well, but at Wikipedia we move pages, rather than cut-and-paste text from an old title to a new title. That way we keep the edit history. See WP:MOVE. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox EventID

Template:Infobox EventID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thorncliffelogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thorncliffelogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wellacre Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wellacre Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary School

The article Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This looks like it is meant to be a disambiguation page. However, there are no articles on either of the listed schools, and no evidence either is notable enough for an article. (Primary schools are not necessarily notable.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LadyofShalott 17:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ferrum High School

The article Ferrum High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school. No citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shantavira|^{feed me} 13:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]