User talk:Canse34

Welcome!

Hi Canse34! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhiram Bhadkamkar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Married Woman has been accepted

The Married Woman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 03:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: His Story (Web series) has been accepted

His Story (Web series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for His Storyy (web series)

On 16 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article His Storyy (web series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the creators of the Indian web series His Storyy changed the ending because of prevailing social discrimination against the LGBTQIA+ community in the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/His Story (web series). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, His Storyy (web series)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aafat-E-Ishq (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also likely fails WP:TOOSOON. As mentioned by the other reviewer, there is a bit of citation overkill and a lot of the references are duplicates of each other. Please consider condensing them and/or removing the unnecessary references (for example we do not need four references that state Neha Sharma is in the film).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hi Canse34! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Boney Kapoor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Razorpay (September 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Perryprog was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for promotion or advertising.

Perryprog (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canse34! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Perryprog (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canse34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Drmies, I read your message and realized that my account is blocked for indefinite time. I wanted to understand the reasons behind the same. However, if it is related to the Razorpay page that i recently worked on, I would like to tell you that I have spoken to multiple admins about the same and they told me that if I think that the references I have are genuine, I can go ahead with the page. At the same time, I also got no definite answer from any of the admins and I decided to go ahead sibnce my research was fool-proof and I knew that the references I picked were genuine. There was no promotional content or mention of any service that could have been on the promotional front. Being said all that, the page I created is already being deleted. Also, I was well-aware about the history of the page and hence, I did not hurry with the completion of the page and verified my sources twice. In case, you still feel that the action of blocking my page was valid, I would like to mention that the page is already been deleted and it does not make a lot of sense to keep my account blocked for indefinite time. You can check my previous edits and you are sure to find most of them having citations, references, and minor and major edits which are all good-to go. Based on my previous edits and the information I submitted just now, I would like to request the admins to take my side into consideration and unblock my account to help me further contribute to the wikipedia community.

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant. You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK, not for the contents of your edits. Yamla (talk) 10:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ohkay,Yamla. Trying to understand the issue here. The issue at hand does not seem like something I have done. I have not created multiple accounts, nor I have done something to influence or do the edits. I haven't revived any old accounts as this one is my own account. Please elaborate the kind of "socking" you are referring to here, because I have not done anything of such kind on wikipedia that I know of to the best of my knowledge.

Concern regarding Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq

Hello, Canse34. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aafat-E-Ishq

Hello, Canse34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aafat-E-Ishq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]