Jump to content

User talk:Cai Simpson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Cai Simpson/sandbox (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Trustatrader.com (May 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Rinkle gorge (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trust a Trader (May 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Sionk (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Trustatrader.com (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JustBerry (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Cai Simpson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trustatrader.com (May 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JustBerry (talk) 21:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trustatrader.com (June 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Trustatrader.com (July 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Jamesx12345 18:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Trustatrader.com (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Oliverlyc 01:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Cai Simpson. You have new messages at Oliverlyc's talk page.
Message added 13:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Oliverlyc 13:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Trustatrader.com was accepted

[edit]
Trustatrader.com, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Oliverlyc 15:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your first article

[edit]

Hi,

Congratulations on successfully creating your first article! Having your article about Trustatrader.com accepted is not the end, but rather the start. The article is not perfect in its present state, and you can still make a lot of improvements to it. As you get the hang of contributing content, please do consider creating new articles, or add on to existing ones. See you around!

Oliverlyc 15:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trust a Trader concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trust a Trader, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trust a Trader

[edit]

Hello Cai Simpson. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Trust a Trader".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trust a Trader}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (October 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
Ideally a little more depth, please. It does appear likely to be notable in our terms, but needs even a few sentences more and a couple more references. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 15:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (November 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 08:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Foot and Ankle Centre (February 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
There isn't one substantial source here. Short quotes in articles about foot disease do not support notability. Bio's at the person's place of work do not support notability, and definitely do not support notability of the organization. Do not return this for review unless you find articles that are entirely or substantially about the organization, not about the individual doctors, and not mentions in articles on foot problems.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trust a Trader - Trustatrader.com

[edit]

The article Trust a Trader - Trustatrader.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet wp:corp. It was mainly sourced to press releases, which I removed. What remains are a few mentions, and a couple of directory entries (Zoominfo is self-editable). What sources exist are local only. I was not able to find anything better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LaMona (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of London Foot and Ankle Centre

[edit]

Hello Cai Simpson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged London Foot and Ankle Centre for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TrustATrader

[edit]

Hello Cai Simpson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TrustATrader for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with London Foot and Ankle Centre. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 15:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TrustATrader, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:London Foot and Ankle Centre

[edit]

Hello, Cai Simpson. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "London Foot and Ankle Centre".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cai_Simpson&oldid=1089585780"