User talk:Cachedio

Sincere thanks for the welcome, but I am already registered, however i didn't login since i was only going to upload a picture from here to commons :-) // User:Notwist --84.216.56.221 14:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Sugar

I reverted it because of it being uncited. Please see WP:RS. Yousou (talk) 16:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to this at User talk:Yousou. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NFL

Hello, colleague wikipedian. I notice as part of your work on Wikipedia that you added sources about, among other topics, Al Jazeera America report about potential HGH from some athletes. The thing is you are avoided WP:DUE in some cases. There is actually a complete wikipage about the report and you can make a link to this page when you're talking about the topic around Wikipedia. You're also invited to edit the page about the documentary. Greetings. Leo Bonilla (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cachedio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweetener listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sweetener. Since you had some involvement with the Sweetener redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — bieχχ (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

Hi Cachedio, no worries at all: I'm currently sending these to as many formally "unaware" people editing in the area as possible, because if a discussion at WP:AE is ever needed, a prior lack of such notifications can be very frustrating.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Sweetener" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sweetener. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 26#Sweetener until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UserTwoSix (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

DanCherek (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Palestinian suicide attacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic Jihad. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]