User talk:CVActor1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CVActor1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Blehfu (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Gould

Did Harold Gould really pass away? I cannot find any reference to this anywhere. Blehfu (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr

Hello CVActor1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ray Carr".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ray Carr}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ray Carr

Hey there! Sorry you've been having so much trouble with the Ray Carr article. First off, I blanked the submission by mistake, and I apologize. It's fixed now.

Second, you're boss shouldn't be asking you to write a Wikipedia article about him. That gives you a conflict of interest.

Third, your boss doesn't seem to be notable. All of the sources are local in nature. Has he received national-level coverage? You're welcome to resubmit the article, but it will probably be rejected again unless there are better sources.

Again, I'm sorry you've had to go through so much bureaucracy, and hopefully this can get resolved quickly one way or the other. --Cerebellum (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ray Carr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ray Carr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ray Carr

Hello, CVActor1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ray Carr".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Ray Carr}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, CVActor1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft:Ray Carr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ray Carr, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lesley Gore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ray Carr

Hello, CVActor1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ray Carr".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Hopkins

You recently added this to the article for Anthony Hopkins: "It was reported today (4/30/16) Antony died at a spokeswoman's home in Los Angeles of congestive heart failure, at 2:35PM today on Worldwide Global News), says BBC.^[1]" I was wondering why no other news source has this story? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop adding the claim that Hopkins has died until you can find a reliable news source. The one you have cited says this "Antony died at her home in Los Angeles of congestive heart failure, according to her spokeswoman at 2:35 pm , Today, 30 Aprils. No more details at the moment , says BBC." This is totally untrue - the BBC says no such thing. Nor does any other news source, anywhere. If you want to discuss this material, please take it to Talk:Anthony Hopkins. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1].

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Hopkins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Carr (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not seeing how this person is not just a single market DJ

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ray Carr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ray Carr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CVActor1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== Mandatory paid editing disclosure

Hello CVActor1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CVActor1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CVActor1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Get into compliance now, before you do anything else, otherwise we will have no choice but to block your account. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronist, I never got a notice of this request, and did not see it until this evening. How many times do I have to say this? I am NOT getting paid. Ray HIMSELF does not even get paid for what he does. College Radio does not pay ANYONE. Everyone at ANY college radio station is a VOLUNTEER. If you don't believe me, call any college radio station and they will tell you this. Call WCSB yourself - 216-687-3515 - THEN maybe you'll believe me. The only remotely possible exception for any kind of payment is the Station Manager - and those seem to change almost monthly. Ray Carr does not pay me. I have said this MANY times here and no one listens. I'd like to know how I am supposed to prove this to all of you. BELIEVE ME, I wish I WAS getting paid, because I am broke. But I am NOT being paid. What do I have to do to get you people to believe me? You talk about disclosure, there is NOTHING to disclose. If you will tell me how to "disclose" this, I'm more than happy to do so, because I would like this thing finally accepted on this site, and to be done with it, but obviously no one really cares or wants to listen because I have been threatened here, told I was a one-article writer, which is not true, I have edited other articles here, and I've been told by Robert McClenon here that he was making sure no one helped me anymore, even after I insisted to him that I am NOT getting paid, and my responses since have been completely ignored. And now you've all gone and deleted the article without any warning to me. Can you please tell me what I can do so that you will finally believe that I am not getting paid for this? If I'm stupid enough to go through all this bullshit here for free, I would think that would be enough proof. But I'm all ears. Please tell me.

AfC notification: Draft:Ray Carr has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ray Carr. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Ray Carr

Draft:Ray Carr, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ray Carr and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ray Carr during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[Worldwide_Global_News-1] [1].

[1]