User talk:CK121119

Welcome!

Hello, CK121119!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Clark (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jordan Clark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jordan Clark, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CK121119! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point out some very specific things I could change to get this article up and running? Thank you :) CK121119 (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the relevant criteria would be WP:NACTOR which she fails. Being an un-named extra is irrelevant and confers zero relevance. Theroadislong (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Please see MOS:DRAFTNOLINK. Magitroopa (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any specific areas you noticed it? Thank you :) CK121119 (talk) 22:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Next Step (Canadian TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As per my edit summary, the edit was not properly sourced, and would have been put in the wrong section regardless... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. Two questions. One, I tried citing a YouTube link in which the video provides proof of my content, yet it pasted the Bing link I used to search. Do you know how I'd fix this? And two, Are there any sentences that you find it more important to source first? Thank you. CK121119 (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube videos will not cut it. You need to find an actual press/media source that reports the season #8 casting. As the show doesn't seem to be produced by Canada anymore, that means you will probably need to find a UK source, which won't be easy and may not be possible... As per WP:NOHURRY, if we can't find a proper source, then we wait until season #8 actually premieres, and look at the actual credited cast list. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. Two questions. One, I tried citing a YouTube link in which the video provides proof of my content, yet it pasted the Bing link I used to search. Do you know how I'd fix this? And two, Are there any sentences that you find it more important to source first? Thank you.

In reference to my Jordan Clark page ↑↑↑↓↓↓

Why does it not cut it if she's specifically telling us about her family and in this specific case, siblings? I wouldn't think she's lying, no? CK121119 (talk) 01:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Clark (actress) has been accepted

Jordan Clark (actress), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi CK121119. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:CJ337 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CJ337. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CK121119

Thank you for creating Jordan Clark (actress).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]